Love Is Blind. We Are Not. Skincare Edition!

Apr 27, 2007 @ 1:01pm

WHICH skincare line can't find it's next face? They mulled signing an It Girl, but didn't think the damage she's done through smoking, drinking, and tanning could be repaired with makeup. Also: they were nervous about all the paparazzi photos where she looks less than glowing.

Girls, don't smoke - it can cost you a fortune. About $750,000 per ad, to be exact.

(0) recommend this link to (8) Comments
 
posted in People Are Talking

Comments

avatar

posted by HeatherChandler

Apr 27, 2007 1:10PM

I have no clue. But as a shot in the dark, I'm going to guess Lindsay Lohan.

avatar

posted by Not Lohan

Apr 27, 2007 1:18PM

Sieeeeeena.

avatar

posted by yl

Apr 27, 2007 1:27PM

it's proactive or shisedo?

avatar

posted by biba

Apr 27, 2007 1:41PM

neutrogena.

avatar

posted by Jess

Apr 27, 2007 3:34PM

So this is how you're breaking the news that Clean + Clear wants a celebrity face?

avatar

posted by taylor warren

Apr 27, 2007 4:00PM

LARA STONE FOR CALVIN KLIEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AHHH!!!!!! =(

avatar

posted by Champagne Bubble of a Girl

Apr 28, 2007 1:30AM

Well it can't be Lindsay (my first guess) because she's already signed with proactive. Hayden from Heros is/was already a Neutrogena girl as was Mischa Barton (and mandy moore! but she's hardly an "it" girl) and they were my other guesses. Nicole and Paris both have beautiful skin (well, it's always very clear at least..DAMN THEM!) I can't really think of any other boozing, smoking "it" girls. I guess it depends on if you mean Hollywood it girls or fashion it girls because they are usually very different. I guess I'll go with Sienna as she sort of straddles the "it" girl line for both fashion and hollywood and I've seen pictures of her skin looking ICK! even though she's beautiful.

avatar

posted by casey

Apr 28, 2007 3:28AM

Scar Jo?

Post Your Comment