posted by Keisha

May 22, 2007 9:30AM

HOT

posted by a lady

May 22, 2007 9:47AM

yes, she's beautiful, but can she vary her expression? please? these aren't polaroids, after all.

posted by Miss Jeffrey

May 22, 2007 9:59AM

I agree with a lady. She needs to vary that expression. Let's see how she does in her next editorial & series of advertising.

posted by astralgirl01

May 22, 2007 10:42AM

I agree with the first poster.... not impressed. She's very tepid, in that teenaged model sort of way. Nothing new that I've seen in her facial expressions, and she needs a new hairstyle STAT. She'll be hot for a while, but someone else will slide in pretty soon.

posted by guest

May 22, 2007 11:00AM

does she only have one look?

posted by Brad Phillips

May 22, 2007 11:09AM

I like this editorial. Seems more like a Miles Aldridge shoot.

I like Catherine ,but she needs to get more of a variety in her facial expressions.Other than that, good.Tops anything US vogue has done in a while.

posted by Raabia

May 22, 2007 11:10AM

How disappointing. I was in love with the polaroids I had seen of her. She came off with a pointed intensity and warmth. I could barely recognize her in this spread. Any pretty face could have performed just as well.

posted by forreal

May 22, 2007 11:14AM

it's the same look/pose/expression in EVERY photo....
disappointing to say the least

posted by R

May 22, 2007 11:15AM

Complete disappointment. She really does need to vary her expression a bit. I felt like I was looking at the same photo over and over.

posted by Brad Phillips

May 22, 2007 11:33AM

As always, Paris Vogue outdoes itself with the gorgeous and unique clothing,pretty editorials,(models on the covers!), and I like Catherine.But she needs to get a more varied look.

It's still better than most US Vogue editorials.

posted by Faran

May 22, 2007 11:38AM

I agree her face is quite static, but perhaps she was directed to be that way?

The styling is insane, but the premise of a high fashion reporter is familiar - remember Hilary Rhoda and Jessica Stam in February's W spread, also holding microphones and standing with a camera crew?

I don't think that takes away from this great shoot, but it's just a reminder.

posted by Jennie

May 22, 2007 11:54AM

She bears a resemblance to Liv Tyler

posted by guest

May 22, 2007 12:00PM

still on the fence on all the mcneil hype and this photoshoot's not making much of an impression on me. she kind of looks like a wide-faced liv tyler in a lot of the shots and it's really lacking an intensity that leaps off the page.

posted by tesstricks

May 22, 2007 12:18PM

Love the clothes, love the bunny ears+evening gown, indifferent about the model.

posted by biba

May 22, 2007 12:42PM

i want that sequined boob-pattern top.

posted by kim

May 22, 2007 1:03PM

the eds with daria & carmen, natasha poly and raquel zimmerman are waaaaaaaaay better than this...

don't believe the mcneil hype...

posted by anonymous

May 22, 2007 2:17PM

these photos are absolutely stupid!
its not even ironic or with humour, its quite pathetic actually

oh yea i interview people in an evening dress, because.....?

posted by Helen

May 22, 2007 6:56PM

I agree with Jennie, she looks a lot like a young Liv Tyler. The colours of the shoot are amazing

posted by Anonymous

May 22, 2007 10:14PM

I think they're great. She may only have one expression, but it's a damn good one.

posted by madhatter

May 23, 2007 12:34AM

just one geeky little thing i have to say, why do the bunny ears (on the cover) have shadows against the sky? i mean, can anyone have shadows against the sky?????

anyway, their craziness at paris vogue is crazzy.

posted by anon

May 23, 2007 7:09PM

Pretty face... but very boring. Same expression over and over and over and over.

posted by Ashley

May 25, 2007 8:04PM

the model on the side outshines her.