steve madden should go back to jail.jpg If it weren’t for the red sole, could you tell these shoes apart?
The pair on the left are $680 Louboutins
The pair on the right are $99.95 Steve Maddens.
They’re identical, down to the to the pinked-edge black leather cross hatching over the toes.
Reader Crystal discovered them while online shopping for shoes to wear to a wedding.
Both are bridal white, but one pair is of less than pure origins…
–ANNA FIELDING GRIGGS

Fashionista in your inbox

Subscribe to our free email newsletter and get the best fashion, style, and beauty news and tips.

Most Popular Stories

Comments [21]

This one isn’t a Louboutin, rather a Bettye Muller from a while ago:
Muller’s “Pearl” – http://www.zappos.com/n/p/p/7310284/c/144.html
vs.
Madden’s “tinah” – http://www.zappos.com/n/p/dp/26211991/c/33877.html
Steve Madden is the f21 of the shoe sect.

This one isn’t a Louboutin, rather a Bettye Muller from a while ago:
Muller’s “Pearl” – http://www.zappos.com/n/p/p/7310284/c/144.html
vs.
Madden’s “tinah” – http://www.zappos.com/n/p/dp/26211991/c/33877.html
Steve Madden is the f21 of the shoe sect.

Ok, so would you rather pay $100 or $700 for something that you WALK on? I know, I know, it’s about design and copyright infringement etc, but still…

Ok, so would you rather pay $100 or $700 for something that you WALK on? I know, I know, it’s about design and copyright infringement etc, but still…

plus they are really painful to wear

plus they are really painful to wear

plus they are really painful to wear

plus they are really painful to wear

WHOA – WAITAMINUTE!
I was really impressed by how similar the SM’s were to the CL’s – I mean REALLY impressed.. but then i compared the enlarged photo of both shoes side by side — SM literally COPIED THE EXACT SAME PICTURE of the CL – look! every nap of the suede, every wrinkle of the lining leather, even the exact angle of the criss-cross straps? COPIED. SM photoshopped their label on and made the sole beige.
If I can see this, then i’m sure CL can get a good little lawsuit going even if it’s just using an altered copyrighted photo for profit.
And I’m also relieved to know that maybe there’s still a chance that knock-offs will never compare to the real thing.

WHOA – WAITAMINUTE!
I was really impressed by how similar the SM’s were to the CL’s – I mean REALLY impressed.. but then i compared the enlarged photo of both shoes side by side — SM literally COPIED THE EXACT SAME PICTURE of the CL – look! every nap of the suede, every wrinkle of the lining leather, even the exact angle of the criss-cross straps? COPIED. SM photoshopped their label on and made the sole beige.
If I can see this, then i’m sure CL can get a good little lawsuit going even if it’s just using an altered copyrighted photo for profit.
And I’m also relieved to know that maybe there’s still a chance that knock-offs will never compare to the real thing.

WHOA – WAITAMINUTE!
I was really impressed by how similar the SM’s were to the CL’s – I mean REALLY impressed.. but then i compared the enlarged photo of both shoes side by side — SM literally COPIED THE EXACT SAME PICTURE of the CL – look! every nap of the suede, every wrinkle of the lining leather, even the exact angle of the criss-cross straps? COPIED. SM photoshopped their label on and made the sole beige.
If I can see this, then i’m sure CL can get a good little lawsuit going even if it’s just using an altered copyrighted photo for profit.
And I’m also relieved to know that maybe there’s still a chance that knock-offs will never compare to the real thing.

WHOA – WAITAMINUTE!
I was really impressed by how similar the SM’s were to the CL’s – I mean REALLY impressed.. but then i compared the enlarged photo of both shoes side by side — SM literally COPIED THE EXACT SAME PICTURE of the CL – look! every nap of the suede, every wrinkle of the lining leather, even the exact angle of the criss-cross straps? COPIED. SM photoshopped their label on and made the sole beige.
If I can see this, then i’m sure CL can get a good little lawsuit going even if it’s just using an altered copyrighted photo for profit.
And I’m also relieved to know that maybe there’s still a chance that knock-offs will never compare to the real thing.

“Ok, so would you rather pay $100 or $700 for something that you WALK on? I know, I know, it’s about design and copyright infringement etc, but still…”
Well, Louboutins are definitely a LOT more comfortable than Steve Maddens. $500 more comfortable? You decide.

“Ok, so would you rather pay $100 or $700 for something that you WALK on? I know, I know, it’s about design and copyright infringement etc, but still…”
Well, Louboutins are definitely a LOT more comfortable than Steve Maddens. $500 more comfortable? You decide.

“Ok, so would you rather pay $100 or $700 for something that you WALK on? I know, I know, it’s about design and copyright infringement etc, but still…”
Well, Louboutins are definitely a LOT more comfortable than Steve Maddens. $500 more comfortable? You decide.

http://www.stevemadden.com/CHAP-WHITE-LEATHER
These Steve Madden shoes are also an exact CL replica for $150.
http://www.net-a-porter.com/images/product/26841/xlarge/index.jpg
While the Roland Mouret for Christian Louboutin has a price tag of $925.

http://www.stevemadden.com/CHAP-WHITE-LEATHER
These Steve Madden shoes are also an exact CL replica for $150.
http://www.net-a-porter.com/images/product/26841/xlarge/index.jpg
While the Roland Mouret for Christian Louboutin has a price tag of $925.

Leave a comment