Models

gemma cleans1.jpg

gemma cleans2.jpg

gemma cleans3.jpg

gemma cleans4.jpg

gemma cleans5.jpg

gemma cleans6.jpg

gemma cleans7.jpg

gemma scrubs.jpg

Comments

avatar
1

posted by guest

Nov 26, 2007 2:19PM

such a dull shoot. Something is off. Maybe the makeup and hair.... only 1, 3 and 4 are o.k if a little boring. Eh. Shes overated.

2

posted by Jacqueminette

Nov 26, 2007 2:38PM

Agree with guest at 2:19. "Dull" is the right word. The clothes are blah, the makeup is blah, the jewelry is blah, etc.

3

posted by nadarine

Nov 26, 2007 2:41PM

as if she'd drink full-calorie Coke.

avatar
4

posted by guest

Nov 26, 2007 3:14PM

I agree; Gemma's new editorial really is kind of bland and boring. But Doutzen's shoot is quite beautiful, and Daria Werbowy looks gorgeous in her editorial. It's a nice change for a leaping Trentini, that's for sure.

avatar
5

posted by guest

Nov 26, 2007 4:33PM

Click on this link! Its hilarious!
http://jezebel.com/gossip/maghag/lolvogue-good-help-is-hard-to-find-326159.php
A funny take on this shoot. I can garauntee its much more intersting than the origninal.

avatar
6

posted by guest

Nov 26, 2007 5:57PM

Somewhat off topic, but this editorial is completely turning the tables on what I thought about the shows. Nina Ricci looks elegant here - almost mother-of-the-bride (in a good way, but still). Balenciaga looks heart-stoppingly beautiful whereas I physically recoiled from the runway images. Jil Sander looks a little...dare I say slutty here? And the Burberry is much sweeter and less gaudy than it appeared on the catwalk. Really bizarre...

7

posted by RayBay

Nov 26, 2007 8:05PM

I want those Armani bug eye shades on page four----- so very badly!

Post Your Comment