Makeup

Get To Know Your Roots

mary kate has roots.jpg The LA Times has a story this week about blondes with roots, and it’s so insane it actually makes sense:


Writer Monica Corcoran asserts that brown roots with blonde hair is “the latest way to feign indifference to your appearance” - if $300 shredded jeans, threadbare designer t-shirts, and anything by Martin Margiela doesn’t really work for you.

Her proof is a slew of rooted celebrities, including both Olsens, Madonna, and even Jessica Simpson, plus Los Angeles stylists paid hundreds of dollars to paint “lowlights” and darker roots onto their fair-headed clients.

There’s also a new wig from the Raquel Welch collection that comes with built-in roots, and a stash of Marilyn and Brigitte Bardot photos showing the sexbombs with their own dark scalps.

Corcoran surmises the tarnished blonde hair represents a good-girl-gone-bad complex, and her argument is both persuasive and intriguing.

Still, in our ash-blonde experience, we can also say those dark streaks growing in are less good-girl-gone-bad and more good-girl-gone-broke.

It must be those $300 jeans that were carefully run over by a monster truck before hitting Barneys…

Comments

1

posted by FWD

Dec 28, 2007 3:56PM

That sounds like the same logic my trendoid first colorist used when he painted blonde "chunky" streaks on my head in 96.

avatar
2

posted by alien man

Dec 28, 2007 4:15PM

How is it feigning indifference if it only proves that you were self-conscious enough to have dyed your hair?

3

posted by fashionursta

Dec 28, 2007 4:29PM

Interesting....but they don't feign indifference to their wrinkles, bumpy and wide noses, or thin lips! I think it's all so phony. I am proud to say that I do not fake my grey roots growing out. They are 100% real. And I look oh so chic when I walk around the city and feign indifference to them. (others may beg to differ, especially the snooty salesperson on Barneys main floor, who look at my roots with such disdain.) I wonder when the Olsens' start to go grey if they will dye their roots darker than their blonde ends so they don't look like they're aging!

avatar
4

posted by guest

Dec 28, 2007 8:17PM

I read an article about this, like, 3 years ago

5

posted by Emily

Dec 29, 2007 3:34AM


I get it, there is something about darker roots that says "I have way better things to do than go to a salon." It kind of goes hand and hand with chipped nail polish. Roots can only go so far untamed, two toned hair doesn't look good on anyone except hot topic salespeople.

avatar
6

posted by guest

Dec 29, 2007 10:55AM

this kelly ripa gross style has got to stop. if you're going to make the commitment to color your hair, don't half ass it.

personally i like my hair color and have never colored it in my life, not even highlights. i don't have to deal with this crap.

honestly it makes hair look greasy and yucky.

only person who pulled it off was kurt cobain.

avatar
7

posted by guest

Dec 30, 2007 3:16PM

This just goes to show that lazy college students as such can go even longer without our fabulous blonde retouch. I don't think I could handle a big brown stripe doen the center of my head for longer then I have to, however.

avatar
8

posted by guest

Jan 01, 2008 6:07PM

all assumptions of "feigning indifference" aside, as a colorist i can definitely say there are some benefits to showing roots. firstly, its ideal to wait on average about six weeks before highlight touch-ups, it prevents overlapping from the previous application. and second, having dark roots gives your hair depth and dimension, not entirely unlike lowlights. p.s. wasn't this a big deal like 4 years ago when sarah jessica parker did it?

Post Your Comment