posted by guest

Jan 16, 2008 8:36PM

what would be so bad about VB being on the cover of vogue? i think it would be MAJOR!!!

posted by TyTy

Jan 16, 2008 9:20PM

Yeah, Posh on the cover of Vogue is not something I'd mind. I can't take another charmless actress.

posted by guest

Jan 16, 2008 11:17PM

GOD, i would rather her be on the cover than other actresses who have.

posted by guest

Jan 16, 2008 11:34PM

I don't see anything wrong with Posh being on the cover of Vogue US either! I think she represents a wonderful disregard for what anyone thinks of her clothing choices, which I think is a great representation of what fashion is truly about. I do think it is unfortunate that she obviously has some eating issues, but she has contributed to a good amount of discussion about fashion.

posted by guest

Jan 17, 2008 3:58AM

A VB Vogue cover would be fab,the Marc Jacobs campaign officially won me over.(not that i wasnt beckham crazed before)
Also, she wore the Dior white trouser + white tank+ black suspenders outfit far better in Elle than Kate Hudson did in last months Vogue.

posted by guest

Jan 17, 2008 6:22AM

I think she's hideous, if mildly interesting, and while she's already been on the cover of Vogue, I see no reason for a repeat. i'm sick of her already.

posted by Lou

Jan 17, 2008 9:54AM

Well I'll take Victoria any time if that means those bland American actresses are out of the cover.

posted by guest

Jan 17, 2008 1:01PM

How about a real MODEL for crying out loud?? I hope Anna Wintour would never stoop so low as to put that used blow-up doll on her cover.

posted by itskiefer

Jan 17, 2008 11:25PM

And not only did VB rock the 'Dior' look far better than Kate Hudson in Vogue, she also put Keira Knightly's Interview cover to shame... Keira Knightly.... that's uber difficult.