Louis Vuitton: The Commercial

Feb 17, 2008 @ 5:06pm

It's amusing that a brand whose entire modern value rests in the hands of celebrities, models, and the wealth that buoys them has made their first-ever commercial -- using none of those things.


Instead, Louis Vuitton's TV debut is a series of traveling men and women who look wide-eyed at monuments and aquariums while a voice over about self-discovery echoes through the images.

Of course, we've never discovered anything about ourselves by buying a $3000 travel bag -

Unless you extend that discovery to the tolerance of our credit card companies.

Somehow, we don't think that's what Louis Vuitton means here.

Comments

posted by alfie

Feb 17, 2008 5:55PM

So off brand.

posted by gunsathome

Feb 17, 2008 5:55PM

It's amusing that a brand whose entire modern value rests in the hands of celebrities, models, and the wealth that buoys them has made their first-ever commercial -- using none of those things.

I see models

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 17, 2008 6:01PM

emotional advertising isn't really breaking news or anything... but i still think LV totally missed the mark with this.

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 17, 2008 6:23PM

As an employee at LVMH, I was intrigued when I heard the brand would be using commercials for the current campaign--it's quite uncharacteristic. However, I think it's been pulled off well, and doesn't evoke the snotty or trashy image that can sometimes become attached to LV when so many fakes are running around and the real bags are dangling off the dangerously thin arms of too-tan celebutantes. A nice first foray into the genre!

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 17, 2008 6:26PM

They're also running this commercial in theaters (or atleast at the Angelika on Houston). Interestingly enough, the entire auditorium broke out in laughter at the end of the commercial when the Louis Vuitton credit showed up. Not, perhaps, the reaction they were going for.

posted by poseur

Feb 17, 2008 7:23PM

i think it is hilarious. if they were going this route, they should at least have done something clever. boring, UNINSPIRING-which is ironic- looks like a travel ad. There are other ways to create amazing things w/o using celebrity or models.

posted by bryanboy

Feb 17, 2008 7:37PM

I love this commercial.

The message is rather clear to me. LV went back and paid homage to their roots: the art of travel. Nowhere in this commercial you'll see the usual "bling" stereotype that's attached to the brand but instead... it's a flashback to the gone days were only the traveling set knows about the monogram.

posted by staceyy

Feb 17, 2008 8:08PM

Hahahhahahaah.
I don't know, it got my attention.
But... not really... in a good way?

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 17, 2008 8:44PM

Those are called "captions", not "voice over"...

And I actually really like this commercial. I think it's funny that all of you are upset that they didn't do something bling-bling with all their favorite toting celebs. That's not what a high-end retailer does. At this point LV is known throughout the world to the point that the bag is the celebrity. They don't need JLo in a commercial to be successful.

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 17, 2008 8:52PM

It's like a parody of the bland, over-focus-grouped modern commercial. Somehow, it manages to combine uninspired wordplay, overwrought back-to-nature tropes, vaguely racist orientalism - all in one utterly nonsensical and ineffective clip! Reminds me a little of the U-North commercial in Michael Clayton.

posted by chessy

Feb 17, 2008 8:55PM

this made me giggle.

posted by Jacqueminette

Feb 17, 2008 9:17PM

Yeah, 'cause I'm really about to wear a three thousand dollar dress while canoing up the Amazon.

The commercial is pretty... but what was the head of marketing smoking?

avatar

posted by soundsoldierxo

Feb 17, 2008 10:58PM

The scenery is pretty in the commercial. But, what does that have to do with LV? Just asking.

posted by MrFashionisto

Feb 18, 2008 12:07AM

I dont know about Jacqueminette, but I would be wearing a three thousand dollar suit, and a pair of Bottega loafers while I canoe up the Amazon. haha.

I do love the commercial. Its different.

avatar

posted by Halie

Feb 18, 2008 12:11AM

I actually like it, or at least I like the message behind it ("the art of travel" as bryanboy put it).

It's less about the tacky bags and more about the lifestyle branding they're trying to create, similar to A&F's "wear our clothes and be casually cool"... LV is trying to tell us that if we buy their bags we too can be cosmopolitan globe-trotters who embrace the beauty of travel.

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 18, 2008 1:18AM

This makes absolutely no sense. I am part of those people roaming the world and experiencing things first-hand in remote locations. I am absolutely positive nobody would embark on such a journey with Louis Vuitton travelgear. Not very practical. I admit the music is beautiful and the images and all, but puh-lease, this is a bad choice from the marketing department. It looks like an airline commercial.

posted by bryanboy

Feb 18, 2008 2:27AM

I think some of the commenters here don't have a better understanding of LV's history. LV was originally known for (and still do) luxurious travel-related goods. The steam trunks, the hard luggage, heck, even to the keepall duffel bags, wallets and what have you. When Marc came into the picture it was only then that Louis Vuitton became "complete" in the sense that they have everything from accessories to ready-to-wear.

But yes... travel is definitely an integral part of the megabrand's DNA. This is why, Poseur, the ad looks like a "travel ad" as you said.

avatar

posted by chloeandoliver

Feb 18, 2008 10:23AM

I'm with bryanboy.

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 18, 2008 11:25AM

This is the strangest thing. How is buying a LV bag giving you that journey or inspiring one? the only company that I know of that encourages what this video is promoting is Vivre (vivre.com). It is almost as if LV put their name on a Vivre ad.

posted by poseur

Feb 18, 2008 12:33PM

well is -like guest@8:52 said: "uninspired wordplay, overwrought back-to-nature tropes, vaguely racist orientalism" the only way to give the idea of travel?

I meant it looks like a travel ad which are already not genuine either. those travel ads are already copies of themselves. If you wrote any city name over there it would have been one of them.

i prefer for innovative ideas, rather than this video i saw over and over many times.

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 18, 2008 4:13PM

We certainly have no idea of what LV intends with this, but I am sure this will make those spending the big bucks on the bags feel much more spiritual about their purchase.

x
soVIPzone.com

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 18, 2008 5:32PM

i agree with bryanboy...LV is reaching back towards their history. So what you didn't like it...i bet there are some out there who actually do go on safari with LV luggage. If you were paying attention there was even an LV saddle....even if their merchadise isn't the BEST to use for heavy travel and exploring, you get the idea. Since when does LV have to satisfy everyone?

posted by Jacqueminette

Feb 18, 2008 7:05PM

MrFashionisto-

Your dedication to the craft of clothing is admirable, and obviously far surpasses my own. [winking emoticon]

In my mind: I'm wearing five-inch Prada pumps (black, patent) and a vintage Alaïa ballgown (translucent, tomato red), standing tall and pointing towards the horizon.

And then I remember that I'm in the habit of tipping canoes, and that piranhas are not my friends.

Cheers,
Adriana

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 18, 2008 10:03PM

i'm completely with bryanboy. i think you need to know of LV's history in order to 'understand' the commercial. i think it's fabulous.

posted by MrFashionisto

Feb 18, 2008 10:24PM

Jacqueminette-

Dedication is not the word. Its Beyond dedication. hehe.

As for Alaia, good choice. That ball gown can put you at least twenty thousand in the hole. But well worth it. Now, are the Prada heels open toe? round? or pointed? I would hope Round toed. Its very in this season. haha.

Where do you reside Jacque? (hope thats not a stalker-ish question... just wondering).

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 18, 2008 11:29PM

Wow. That is awful. Clotaire Rapaille would have a field day with this -- off-brand, off-code, destined for the dustbin of history.

posted by Jacqueminette

Feb 19, 2008 12:34AM

MrFashionisto-

I do fantasize about round-toed shoes. Alas, the pair that I own are quite pointy platform pumps (bought a year ago at Bergdorf's post-Christmas sale). I can't resist a good BDSM-inspired look. I mean, I live across the Bay from San Francisco, so what do you expect?

Cheers,
Adriana

P.S. Not stalker-ish. The answer is "Berkeley".

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 19, 2008 1:32AM

This commercial is such a slap on the face for true travelers out there. A journey, especially a personal one, transcends above material things, and for LV to put out such imagery as to equate the two (traveling+LV accessories=journey experience) missed the mark of traveling completely. While it is true that LV has its foundations of traveling, the reality is that it has become one of the iconic faces of excessive wealth and symbol of economic position, whose clientele are not bothered much about where to take their spiritual journey with their new bags. If the commercial wanted to harken the LV ideals of eons ago then it would have to overcome the tremendous social image marc j. have built for the brand. To sum up, this commercial doesn't equate with today's perception of LV. It's pretty though.

posted by Jacqueminette

Feb 19, 2008 4:49PM

Oops. Due to two (Freudian?) slips of the fingers, it appears that you all are privy to the name I go by outside of my francophone community. Oh, well.

posted by crod

Feb 19, 2008 7:35PM

hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmm.........
how does the commercial ever relate to LV
JUST ASKING ...i dont know
maybe i missed it or something?
=l

avatar

posted by guest

Feb 20, 2008 9:56AM

I think this ad IS on brand when you consider the LV heritage (as others have already mentioned). They are clearly in dire need of pulling themselves away from the bling and vacuous culture they have become a feature of and I think this is the right strategy.

Giving the brand some much needed depth is a good idea. The problem I have with this execution is the worthiness of the copy and insipidity of tone. The ad goes nowhere and I was bored after 20 seconds.

Hopefully in their follow-up they won't go wandering back up their arse for that all important depth.

Post Your Comment