posted by laney

Mar 10, 2008 12:25PM

leather pants AND red ray bans. nice, lindsay...

posted by Katie

Mar 10, 2008 12:56PM

I love that she is wearing an anti-fur pin while dressed almost entirely in leather.

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 12:59PM

Leather with the anti-fur pin? Shame shame.

posted by miss_k

Mar 10, 2008 1:01PM

I think the above commenters are missing the point of the post...

It isn't about whether or not leather pants are fashinable or not, it's about Lindsay potentially wearing leather pants and an anti-fur button at the same time.

posted by Jacqueminette

Mar 10, 2008 1:01PM

Looks a little like mercerized cotton, which is great on jackets, and not so great on pants.

Either way, she would look so much better if she laid off the sunbathing.

posted by syako

Mar 10, 2008 1:03PM

um isn't that exactly what ashley olsen wore to the miss sixty show...?

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 1:05PM

leather & an anti-fur pin??

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 1:17PM

i like to think that the point is that she isn't wearing leggings... right?

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 1:48PM

um, i don't think they are leather pants. they look like those black, super shiny earnest sewn jeans. sorry...

posted by Faran Krentcil

Mar 10, 2008 1:52PM

Hey those aren't leather pants, they're the PVC knockoffs from American Apparel. $30 and fabulous.

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 2:01PM

i'm pretty sure they're either pvs leggings or coated denim

how do you not know these things, those are both hugely popular!

and you call yourself a fashionista...

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 2:24PM

those may be pvc leggings, but that is definitely a leather jacket and possibly leather shoes. oh linds.

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 3:59PM

Everyone should be against fur, whether they wear leather, eat meat, whatever.

No one is perfect, but that shouldn't stop us from opposing certain cruelties--like fur--when we can.

Or should we only expect perfect people to take a stand? We might be left waiting...

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 4:13PM

Hmm, yes, fur does not equate to leather. Fur is somewhat like hair you know? Yes. Leather is made out of the same animal as a typical burger. So, one can eat burgers and be against fur usage can they not?

I don't get what's so wrong with her wearing leather pants and an anti-fur pin. You eat a cow, might as well make jeans out of the hide. I don't remember anyone eating a mink after they made a Dior furcoat out of twenty of them...

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 5:06PM

leather pants would be a step up from leggings...right?

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 6:57PM

also hilariously hypocritical considering she is photographed CONSTANTLY wearing big fur coats - often as a full family affair with her mother and sister in on the "trend" as well (most recently)ala her trashy long island roots

posted by Jac

Mar 10, 2008 7:35PM

Lohan is just trash. can we forget her already?

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 8:53PM

leather is a byproduct, fur is not

what about people doing SOMETHING upsets those who do nothing?

posted by guest

Mar 10, 2008 9:56PM

Ya...but guest at 4:13-
Unfortunately, the cows that are used to make leather are not the same ones that are slaughtered for beef. So, as much as Lindsay (or any anti-fur person) is doing to "help," they're killing just as many animals by wearing leather as they are by wearing fur.

posted by Katie

Mar 11, 2008 1:21PM

Since when does wearing a pin constitute "doing something?"