posted by syako

Apr 22, 2008 3:33PM

eek. I don't know how to say this without sounding rude - but a friend of ours recently came to America from Russia, and she wears these floral print leggings/tights - it's really odd and very unattractive even on her cute small figure!!

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 3:35PM

Perfect for a rainy spring.

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 3:59PM

totally heinous but a great window display none the less

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 3:59PM

overkill. I love printed tights like paisley or sth, but these r just plain weird. you'd look like a geriatric

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 4:05PM

ugh...

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 4:09PM

I think they look really cool as part of the window display. However, much like couture outfits, when worn off the runway (or in this case out of the display window), they just don't work.
I really can't see anyone with any body type pulling those off.

posted by fay

Apr 22, 2008 4:36PM

Awful. I doubt they'd look good on anyone (other than a mannequin).

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 4:42PM

Is it just me or do the flowers kind of look like grapes upside down?

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 4:43PM

they look just like my sister's laura ashley bedspread circa 1994.

florals for spring, how original.

posted by adristar

Apr 22, 2008 4:45PM

those tights are great! maybe with a black or heather grey minidress, and small flats.
and then you could wear a really wild, mismatched bag.

love it
and since when don't couture outfits work off the runway? they don't work because people jump all over it when someone wears something "strange"

posted by marc lover

Apr 22, 2008 4:55PM

OVERKILL!!!

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 5:29PM

i love wolford, but those stinking things probably cost over $200 and are a pain to clean.

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 6:11PM

ew! those hideous curtain tights make even the mannequin look ginormo!

posted by purly

Apr 22, 2008 6:22PM

I like em.

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 6:37PM

ugh. overkill... i love tights with prints but the floral is too much.

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 8:27PM

I kind of like them.

I can see wearing them with something black on top; like a black cotton mini shirtdress.

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 9:35PM

i think they might work with some towering, chunky black heels and a gray minidress

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 9:41PM

needs more giant purple flowers

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 9:46PM

I still have nightmares about my mom dressing me in leggings with that same print on them. It hurts.

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 9:54PM

AMAZING i have been pining after valentino for wolford since the end of march, they are $400 though, and that IS overkill.

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 9:55PM

I am all about the spring florals....but this is overkill sad to say.

What about a nice semi sheer purple /pink tight instead?

~Danielle

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 10:26PM

I personally love them, but whether or not I could actually pull them off is an entirely different story...

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2008 11:44PM

....i can never say never. odds are i'd end up wearing them somewhere with some 90s minimalist dress.

posted by jillj

Apr 23, 2008 12:30AM

NOOOOOOOOO.....please tell me who will be wearing these. They are making a statement for us to talk about........ like we are....but can't deny the inspiration factor! Love the pic!

posted by guest

Apr 23, 2008 12:54AM

Are those opaque white tights, or are they sheer hose on a white mannequin?

Printed tights were so popular in the 80s. If they are opaque, they look like they came from some flea market where they were unloading 20-year-old hosiery for $1 a pair.

If they are sheer, the print is all wrong. I can't imagine a pale lavender print looking good on any skin tone. They have to do bolder colors on a sheer hose that lets the skin tone show through, and it might look cool and fresh.

posted by guest

Apr 23, 2008 9:47AM

I love florals but not on tights. These make the mannequin look like it has a skin condition. Not flattering!

posted by guest

Apr 23, 2008 10:53AM

They totally stole this idea from Marc Jacobs' Victoria Beckham ads.

posted by jaja

Apr 23, 2008 1:10PM

Winsome!

posted by guest

Apr 23, 2008 6:59PM

uuugh, serious overkill. though I do think that floral print is pretty..just not on tights, please!

posted by guest

Apr 29, 2008 9:22AM

It would've been cuter if they'd just done some accent flowers, like one on the thigh and a few on the opposite ankle.

posted by guest

Apr 30, 2008 8:04AM

eeeeeeeeeeew!!! definitely one of those things we'll look back on and go, eeeeeeeew!!