posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 11:19AM

NK

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 11:37AM

helloo nicole. no one would remember this dress or given it a second glance if it hadn't been on her.

posted by mpw

Apr 24, 2008 11:38AM

Schnabel!

posted by fay

Apr 24, 2008 11:45AM

Nicole.

posted by Hoyaheel

Apr 24, 2008 11:47AM

I like Schnabel's jewelry better but Kidman's hair and purse better. I think the dress looks good on both, though....

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 11:48AM

nk nk nk!

posted by RayBay

Apr 24, 2008 11:49AM

Olatz. That deep a red does not flatter Kidman's chalkiness tone and dishwater blond hair. Also, my perception of the prototypical YSL femme is sultry, tan, and slightly exotic looking. Bianca Jagger being the prototype.

And yes, I know that Karen Elson totally made it work in her campaign for them a few years back, despite her pallid skin tone. But that's because Elson is magical.

posted by Sarah Rayleen

Apr 24, 2008 12:00PM

Definitely Nicole Kidman. The contrast of the bright red against her pale skin is stunning. Also, the dress simply looks more appealing on Nicole's body.
It looks too orange on Olatz. Not to mention the squished cleavage combined with that tacky necklace is overkill.

posted by bLair m

Apr 24, 2008 12:13PM

nicoleeeeee.

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 12:50PM

Olatz. Olatz is sexy and artistic and interesting. Nicole is beautiful woman, but that's about it.

posted by FashionHurricane

Apr 24, 2008 12:50PM

nicole

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 1:39PM

Olatz Schnabel. Nicole is not attractive, nothing pretty about her IMO.

posted by kijjalyn

Apr 24, 2008 1:51PM

I say Nicole too. But I have never seen a woman in her seventh month of pregnancy look like this. There is hardly a trace of a bump. Where is her belly?

posted by FashionIntelligentsia

Apr 24, 2008 2:07PM

Is it fine to say neither? I dare Nicole to make her face move.

posted by kimmi

Apr 24, 2008 3:50PM

Pregnant woman wins, always. Even if her "bump" is invisible at 7 months.

posted by onlylivinggirlinmontreal

Apr 24, 2008 4:06PM

Nicole!

posted by yuki

Apr 24, 2008 4:57PM

Nicole!

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 5:17PM

nicole makes it look like a designer gown. olatz makes it look like something off the rack at macy's.

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 7:17PM

Schnabel. I completely agree with RayBay.
Plus NK's alien-look-alike factor makes everything she wears look like a joke to me.

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 9:04PM

personally, I like the red on nicole's pale skin tone, I think olatz has too much red in her skin, and the red of the dress doesn't really pop. Not to mention I think I owned that necklace olatz is wearing when I was in middle school...

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 9:27PM

nicole, by far.. it complements her skin..

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 10:20PM

I think the dress is ugly and they both look terrible in it

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 10:41PM

I just hope that one day America realizes that naturally pale skin is actually beautiful, and that frying (and prematurely aging) your skin to look more "exotic" is kinda pathetic. Redheads were not meant to look tanned. I don't like Nicole, and do agree she looks like an alien. But I was hoping that, in 2008, we would be smart enough about health and realistic enough about beauty not to comment on so-called "chalky" skin.

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2008 10:47PM

i vote for the one who isn't fake-pregnant and unable to move her eyebrows.

posted by guest

Apr 25, 2008 9:59AM

nicole kidman, obviously. there really is no competition. olatz makes the dress look so average while on kidman it looks absolutely glamourous. you have to be blind to not to see that.

posted by RayBay

Apr 25, 2008 11:33AM

Guest 10:41:

Chalk-, or milk-, white skin can be beautiful. Karen Elson, Dita Von Teese, Rose McGowan: these are just three examples.

I just think this shade of red is wrong on Nicole, especially with her hair dyed this shade. It is NOT her natural hair color, and it makes her look washed out and, honestly, rather sickly.

I also don't think paler skin needs to be championed quite so much. All the top girls, cept Chanel Iman, are pale as pale can be.

I hate the tanorexic look, I do.

But I think Olatz is naturally dusky and olive toned in her complexion. Much like my own mother, who does not tan, but always looks it. It's a characteristic of Mediterranean, semitic, and Hispanic origin, which unfortunately seems to be thought of as less classy in the world of fashion (and the media in general).

And don't even pretend to know what I mean by the word "exotic".

posted by guest

Apr 25, 2008 11:42AM

I'd have to say Nicole Kidman because she actually looks like a human for once in this picture

posted by maiabergman

Apr 25, 2008 12:00PM

Cmon, Nicole is creepy.
Thats why she does all that horror films maybe?

posted by guest

Apr 25, 2008 2:25PM

Dita Von Teese and Rose McGowan actually use lighter makeup...they aren't all that pale. (Check the hands)

As for the dress, neither.

posted by bastylefilegirl

Apr 28, 2008 2:33PM

Olaz, ugh Nicole looks like some type of fake wax figure!