As I was packing my bag to come to the office today, my roommate stopped me on my way out the door and asked an all too familiar question: "Is that a woman's bag?"
Sure. It's a black leather Marc by Marc tote with a little bit of shine to it. I got it on Bleecker and I've seen it carried everywhere around the city - mostly by women. But is that a bad thing?
I see fashionable men carry totes of all sizes all the time, but at what point along the bag spectrum (think of say, a briefcase on one end and a pink Juicy pouchette on the other, with a carryall from American Apparel in the middle) are men supposed to stop?
It's funny how I'd carry a Muse, the rigid structure has a masculine appeal to it, though I'd never carry a Stam - even I'd make fun of the kiss lock closure.
So I'm wondering, where do all of you stand on this? Can a man embrace the functionality and cuteness of a woman's bag without coming off as totally silly?
Better yet: Do bags really have a gender?
--KYLE HAYES
(almost forgot - image from the Sartorialist!)











posted by poseur
May 29, 2008 12:14PM
some people call it murse, right? i don't know. strapped bags are ok for me but not the tote bags. or anything shiny. maybe it is because i can't differentiate the hot gay guys from the hot straight guys if they all carry purses. oh and hipsters with tote bags are not ok!