Jun 24, 2008 @ 12:33pm

long live supermodels.jpg

PHOTOGRAPHER: PETER LINDBERGH
STYLIST: CARINE ROITFELD

supermodels 1.jpg

supermodels 2.jpg

supermodels3.jpg

supermodels 4.jpg

supermodels 5.jpg

supermodels 6.jpg

supermodels 7.jpg

supermodels 8.jpg

supermodels 90.jpg

supermodels 10.jpg

supermodels 11.jpg

supermodels 12.jpg

supermodels 13.jpg

supermodels.jpg

Comments

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 12:41PM

I kind of don't like it. Is that really weird?

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 1:06PM

I agree. None of them look mildly attractive. I expected more from the models as well as Paris Vogue. Except Catherine McNeil. Once again she does an editorial with the exact same expression in every photograph.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 1:06PM

theres something sort of eighties about it.
and the doutzen boob shot is a little awkward.
i don't like it much either.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 1:11PM

Sasha and Natasha look GREAT! I LOVE THIS!

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 1:16PM

the pic of doutzen with her boob out made me giggle! doutzen strikes me as the kind of girl who doesn't even swear, let alone flash her chest. that seems more of a thing lara stone or someone would do.

posted by LauraMilli

Jun 24, 2008 1:18PM

Oo LOVE this, thanks! Though I can't believe how skinny Natasha and Lily look in this shoot. Everyone knows they're skin and bones, but in this shoot it does look a little awkward.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 1:19PM

i'm really not feeling lily donaldson at all, ever.

avatar

posted by daisy11

Jun 24, 2008 1:20PM

not one to usually say something like this but i think everyone in these photos looks scary skinny.

posted by sarahchivonne

Jun 24, 2008 1:36PM

they all look like exactly the same person. and doutzen with the boob = awkward

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 1:45PM

i think it works in the context of the broader magazine -- "au charme francais" -- and is an interesting take on Parisian chic...and despite the weight thing, I think the group shot invokes the golden era of supermodels...which I miss desperately!!

posted by Natalie Hormilla

Jun 24, 2008 1:49PM

yeah, it kind of looks like they were all sitting behind the camera like, "hmm, what does this need? ...i know, a breast! doutzen, NOW!"

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 1:52PM

Natasha looks like a 40-year-old plastic surgery junkie, especially in the photo 3rd from the bottom (with the hat).

Sasha looks beautiful.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 1:56PM

Good Lord, long legs. How come she's showing us her boob?

avatar

posted by dcchung86

Jun 24, 2008 1:58PM

This shoot feels a bit weary and overdone. It's makes me feel as if we're staring through the haze of cigarette smoke, wafting from the mouths of 20-somethings, who appear to be chic, but are really dying from ennui on the inside.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 2:11PM

I love it. Totally reminds me of editorials I haved saved from the eighties and early nineties.

On a side note, I remove my ed's from magazines by using a boxcutter. hint hint :)

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 2:12PM

Sasha really stands out, she looks beautiful in every shot.

Natasha.... geez... is that what happens when you stop eating.

Catherine has one expression, it's really sad.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 2:19PM

Catherine also can't take make-up: ie her horrific Versace ads...

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 2:57PM

i disagree with everyone, i love this! SO french, with the little things out of place (the breast, the hole in her tights, the awkward posing). the smoke, the legs, and the black....so french.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 3:36PM

One of these things is not like the other...one of these things just doesn't belong...like the boob shot.
Totally awkward.

posted by sarahnicole

Jun 24, 2008 3:43PM

i adore this spread. the elegance and the gaucherie, together. it's imperfect and lovely and oui, so french.

i want eiffel tower panties now.

posted by marybelle

Jun 24, 2008 3:52PM

I like it. In fact, I like it a lot. very witty and a little wry. I REALLY want those over the knee boots - FASHIONISTA who makes them?

avatar

posted by disneyrollergirl

Jun 24, 2008 3:54PM

I'm not crazy about it. Bought French Vogue today and thought, hmm, something's not right. As others have already said, they look skinny and over-made up. The make-up's making them look a bit...haggard?

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 3:56PM

I find Natasha too skinny mostly, but I am obsessed wioth photos of lots of (super)models. they are always so... WOW!

posted by aninnka

Jun 24, 2008 4:05PM

I'm a supermodel and my hair will shine like the sea...

Love the spread, hate that boob coming out, it's like cover up missy! what would your mother say?

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 4:33PM

I don't even know why they try to do editorials with a zillion models anymore. These pages don't even come close to the spreads in the '90s with lots of models together. All lined up, they were glamorous, glowing and smiling, each with her own unique look (do a Google image search for "vogue january 1990). None of this chicken-bones, expressionless, clones-of-each-other stuff.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 4:37PM

I absolutely love this. I'm relatively young, but I've never seen our Vogue do anything like this., and marybelle, I believve those boots are Margiela.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 4:46PM

ugh, these chicks all need some omega-3's and some sleep.

natasha looks 40.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 5:08PM

I can definatley see how the creaters of the shoot thought that a spread with the top models of the day would rock, but somehow it just doesn't work. And the extreme emaciated look (of Lily Donaldson especially) is very unattractive. Doesn't make me want the clothes.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 5:19PM

A little sleazy, a bit glamorous, and a new crop of exotic supermodels? Love this! Bold, unapologetic, with Sasha looking perfect, as always.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 6:29PM

love the closeup of the underwear, especially the one with the eiffel tower, but the boob shot just looks so forced. the spread would've seemed more cohesive and witty with just the hints of lingerie sans forced, awkward boob shot.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 7:05PM

ok, i agree that it is weird that these girls are even capable of looking 40 considering how young they are, but the goal was clearly to make them look that way -- part of the french sleaze/gaucherie thing other commenters mentioned...

...and we obsess over the (hilarious) boob action w/ nary a mention of the crotch shot?!

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 7:28PM

they all look exactly the same. period.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 7:40PM

sasha looks great! am i the only one who thinks lilly looks so scary?

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 7:58PM

I feel like the photo shoot focuses more on the models than the actual clothes, which kind of just blend into the background. Lily and Sasha look lovely, but they really need to fatten up! But overall, I like the classic, yet sexy and audacious feel of the clothes--just wish i could see them better!

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 8:42PM

I feel like they emphasized the "skinny drone" angle a little too much... the girls get a little lost in the LEGS! BONES! RAZOR-SHARP CLAVICLES! clamor which I think all parties who made this spread are capable of going beyond.

But, it's still really fun seeing them together. Glam, moody, etc.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 9:22PM

Sasha has the biggest, most muscular thighs of them all. And that's saying something! Looking at Natasha & Lily, you just want to give them some food.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 10:32PM

Ack! You guys usually give us a warning, I looked at this at work earlier!

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 24, 2008 10:58PM

Aaaahhh, so as opposed to the shoot with the all "ethnic" models, we are back to the drawing board of stick-thin white girls who all look hungry and -- sadly-- identical.

posted by veritas

Jun 25, 2008 12:21AM

love all the photos, im glad fashionista posting more fashion spreads like this.........

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 25, 2008 1:29AM

it's true, lily is waaaay too skinny, but what else is new? get her off that pinkberry!

but doutzen and sasha's thighs are way bigger than originally thought. i think they actually look pretty healthy...i mean, comparatively. and @ commenter from 10:58pm....i don't think that just because all the girls are white makes them look identical. c'mon, sasha is way cooler than catherine mcneil.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 25, 2008 2:06AM

Haha I love what Natalie said at 1:49, that captures the shot perfectly.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 25, 2008 12:24PM

I actually love this spread. Some of the photos are awkward and should have been scrapped imho (boob shot!) but some of the other ones are really good. And I want the shoes, especially those boots in the 7th one down.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 25, 2008 12:37PM

yikes, lily looks like she's gained a few pounds. the shoot is boring though.

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 28, 2008 7:10PM

i love it! Lily and Natasha are so fabolous

avatar

posted by guest

Jun 29, 2008 5:23PM

haha guest at 7:05, i thought the same thing. who's crotch do we think that is?

i love the spread....reminded me of 80s too

sasha's legs are big only compared to the rest of her..there is a pic of her in the front of the magazine in only a bra that is kind of scary.

and whats so wrong with catherine mcneil? i like her

avatar

posted by LeMagnifique

Jun 29, 2008 8:02PM

They are supposed to reference famous parisian high class call girls from the mid 70s lol !

The story works very well.

Sleazy glamour meets classic French. Fabulous. :-)))

Post Your Comment