Thinking Outside the Box

Jun 30, 2008 @ 2:32pm

estee lauder sensuous ad gwyneth.jpgWe thought Gwyneth Paltrow's July Bazaar cover was just a very delayed reaction to Iron Man - turns out it's part of a 40-page Estée Lauder campaign that continues within the magazine, just barely disguised as editorial.

The cosmetic giant placed the four faces of their new perfume, Sensuous, throughout the issue, even though the actual ads don't debut until fall. The move means a priceless Gwyneth cover for Bazaar and an insane amount of advertising for Estée Lauder before their ads, (which also feature Elizabeth Hurley, Carolyn Murphy and Hilary Rhoda), even hit.

This weekend, The New York Times asked if the partnership meant Hearst, (which owns Bazaar) was selling out, before admitting that it's actually a pretty smart move.

This morning, WWD reports an even cooler partnership between Marie Claire, (which is also owned by Hearst) and Ray-Ban. The two have commissioned five New York City artists to create billboards to promote Ray-Ban's new colored Wayfarers. And the magazine will also run three times more Ray-Ban ads this year than ever before.

The symbiotic relationship between fashion magazines and fashion advertisements has been losing steam as circulation has slowed for print publications and more companies turn to online advertising. So while at first these ad campaigns, whether subliminal like Estée Lauder's or in your face like Ray-Ban's, seemed a bit desperate, we actually think they're kind of cool - especially when real artists are getting into the mix and what used to be a boring ad gets taken to a new creative level.

We actually kind of love it, and we're sure Andy Warhol's probably giggling in his grave.

Comments

avatar
1

posted by guest

Jun 30, 2008 2:41PM

um there's nothing subliminal about the Lauder/Bazaar thing - the New York Times reports that the opening page of the well features the line “The faces of Estée Lauder’s new Sensuous fragrance wear the highlights of the FALL COLLECTIONS.” Hopefully ASME is taking note.
http://www.magazine.org/editorial/guidelines/

avatar
2

posted by guest

Jun 30, 2008 2:56PM

I found that issue of Bazaar to be kind of obnoxious for that reason.

avatar
3

posted by guest

Jun 30, 2008 3:16PM

I agree with guest 2:56 and disagree with the fashionista post (sorry Britt!).

It seems obnoxious and money grubbing. I hate to say this, but if this is what it takes to save the mags from declining sales, then maybe they should just let nature take its course instead of this slow, undignified death.

avatar
4

posted by disneyrollergirl

Jun 30, 2008 4:51PM

I'm sure I read a big article somewhere that said that publishers like Conde Nast and Hearst have these whole divisions that are like in-house ad agencies. Am I imagining it?

5

posted by helen

Jun 30, 2008 5:46PM

Where was the outcry when SJP was on the cover of Vogue entirely to promote Covet? It's the same idea, to me. Not that it makes it any better, necessarily.

The fact that the *cover* of this month's Vogue reads "Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman in the highly anticipated summer epic AUSTRALIA" made me far more annoyed than Bazaar's symbiotic relationship with Lauder.

Post Your Comment