6
posted by guest
Aug 08, 2008 3:49PM
i have to disagree with the last three posts.the dress might appear shorter on blake (due to the fact that it is two tiers hemmed shorter) but look at how long her legs look!jenna looks dis-proportioned in it (long torso, stumpy legs).and can we also note, those t-straps on blake...HOT!i think jenna needs to eat a bit more carbs.she's starting to look like skeletor with chest-floatation-devices and bad extensions.
13
posted by guest
Aug 08, 2008 4:37PM
JUDGING ON ONLY THE BODIES, YOU WOULD THINK THAT BLAKE WAS THE PORN STAR HERE.
AND I TOTALLY AGREE WITH WHOEVER SAID JENNA'S BODY LOOKS DISPROPORTIONATE. AND ALTHOUGH BLAKE LOOKS VERY NAKED, SHE IS ROCKIN' THAT DRESS, HER BODY IS OBVIOUSLY MORE HEALTHY AND YOUNGER LOOKING THAN JENNA'S.
18
posted by guest
Aug 08, 2008 5:27PM
Proportionally speaking, Blake looks much better in the dress than Jenna. Jenna looks hella stumpy and-- let's face it-- short. Despite the length which did make me do a double take, the dress just fits Blake better.
If only it was about 4 inches longer though!
And it's a Venn diagram guys... sorry to be the grammar police but it's not "ven"
Venn
Not Ven.
For future reference.
19
posted by HiFashionLvr
Aug 08, 2008 5:33PM
wow i really don't know. the length makes it a totally different dress. Jenna looks more mature refined, but Blake looks more young and sexy.
20
posted by fourthavenue
Aug 08, 2008 5:48PM
to number 6:
jenna looks disproportionate because of the camera angle and the lighting.
and jenna looks better.
38
posted by guest
Aug 09, 2008 1:39PM
Jenna wore the dress the best IMHO! And I don't care that she was a porn star at all!! Who am I to judge how someone else makes their money (fortune in Jenna's case!)? Blake looks good in it, but Jenna looks more like a lady, and Blake looks more like she belongs on the Hills.. (and don't hate me for being the one saying it)
But on the flip side, they both have amazing bodies, and they both wear the dress as intended, I just think on some of the younger "starlettes" it looks kinda cheap compared to when you see Jenna or a Spice Girl in a Herve Leger dress! Honestly, Blake looks just like Lindsay Lohan or LC in the dress, but Jenna is wearing the dress, it's not wearing her.
39
posted by guest
Aug 09, 2008 3:20PM
I think they look identical. Same hair, same boobs, same face, similarly accessorized.
I think Jenna Jameson looks a bit better, only because I prefer the length, although Blake's body looks better.
I am assuming Jenna looks so sinewy because of the shadowing and the fact that she's a hell of a lot older than Blake Lively.
(comparing the body of a 21 year old to a 34 year old is just not fair)
40
posted by catlovescoco
Aug 09, 2008 6:38PM
I agree with comment 7... while I seriously don't want to say Jenna, the length does look better, even though Blake has the shoes down pat.
41
posted by guest
Aug 09, 2008 7:09PM
ohh, fun blake lively quote:
"I want to work and, at the end of the day, I want to go to dinner and watch a movie," she says. "I don't want to go to a club and not wear panties."
Girl's got a brain!
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/arts/story.html?id=50c89ed5-1469-4def-9505-eaafcb65ae8b
43
posted by guest
Aug 09, 2008 8:09PM
Can't believe I'm saying this, but Jenna looks better. It flatters her body and surprisingly doesn't look tacky.
On Blake, however, the dress looks cheap. She has an amazing figure, but this dress does nothing for it. If anything, it makes her look a bit bigger than she is.
53
posted by bastylefilegirl
Aug 11, 2008 11:28AM
rotflol at what I'm about to say but Jenna the length of the dress gives her a classier edge. Wow seriously I just said that!
56
posted by xomeghanxo03
Aug 12, 2008 11:43AM
most deff blake..but yet again she can rock jus bout anything.
<3
posted by guest
Aug 08, 2008 3:24PM
duh! blake!