posted by guest

Aug 13, 2008 3:01PM

I'm loving the Givenchy dress with the Gold Chains. I just saw Madonna in the dress.

posted by guest

Aug 13, 2008 3:05PM

Stunning!

posted by LauraMilli

Aug 13, 2008 3:18PM

I love those gold slacks and the Tisci dress!

posted by guest

Aug 13, 2008 3:50PM

love this spread

posted by guest

Aug 13, 2008 4:13PM

I love Catherine McNeil, she looks so glamorous

posted by guest

Aug 13, 2008 5:32PM

i love catherine

posted by guest

Aug 13, 2008 5:52PM

Hey Fashionista!

Love your site...but am rankled.

Why? You are reposting and reposting other peoples editorials, but not crediting the mag and not always the photog (though we can see his name here).

Not only are we curious - who, where, why? -- we also can't help but feel that its relying a little to heavily on the intellectual property of others to provide your content ---something you give others quite a hard time for...

xo
BK

ps - catherine looks damned fine.

posted by rikkikay

Aug 13, 2008 6:39PM

The sixties and seventies (seventies in particular) are my favorite decades for inspiration. Style in this era evokes diversity and brilliance, a sense of freedom that translates into fashion followers identifying those pieces that leave them wholly besotted. The fluidity, motion, color pallets, prints, textures, and intricate details allow the vixens of the world to define that which makes them singular, special, and therefore irresistible.

posted by Natalie Hormilla

Aug 13, 2008 6:52PM

guest #8, we always post the name of the magazine. just read the tags at the bottom in the red letters, they're there 100% of the time. as for the photog, you should always be able to read the name in the title page of the spread, which is always the first page after the jump.

posted by guest

Aug 13, 2008 9:09PM

this shoot is great--lots of textures, prints, and autumn tones. all the outfits are well put-together, and catherine mcneil looks stunning!

posted by guest

Aug 13, 2008 9:10PM

While it's true you include the name of the mag in very small type near the bottom of the post, it took me a number of visits to this site to figure that out. It's very discreet.

I do think it's often difficult or impossible to read the name of the photographer (you are, after all, take an 8x11 page and condensing it online). Just a couple examples:

http://fashionista.com/2008/08/post_1306.php#more

http://fashionista.com/2008/07/post_1266.php#more

And what I find most frustrating is that the stylist is pretty much NEVER listed.

I've never understood why, if you take the time to scan these spreads and they do make up such a substantial portion of your content, you don't take the time to provide legible citations...it's not only fair (and consistent with your otherwise close attention to intellectual property), it's also information that is interesting to your readers.

posted by cesarcmma

Aug 13, 2008 9:21PM

thanks.....I like when you guys put this awesome spreads in your site because here there's no place to buy these mags.

By the way Catherine looks gorgeous, as always.

posted by valenlb

Aug 13, 2008 9:59PM

So pretty! And her hair looks gorgeous...

posted by guest

Aug 13, 2008 10:28PM

i LOVE this spread.

posted by guest

Aug 14, 2008 12:24AM

someone help!!!
Are those green silk organza pants Oscar de la renta???

~ff~

posted by guest

Aug 14, 2008 6:40AM

Is it just me is is this shoot channeling a glammed-up Annie Hall? I love it!

posted by guest

Aug 14, 2008 7:37AM

vive Vogue UK!!!! so much better than the American version, don't you think?

posted by guest

Aug 14, 2008 8:39AM

I agree with guest's Nr. 8/12 constructive criticism and you would do well to take it to heart, considering that it is other people's work that provides a great deal of your content and you could stand to be more gracious (and informative) about it.