Comments on: Carrie: Not Dead?

By: guest

guest — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:28:02 +0000

haha I couldn’t agree more guest #7

By: guest

guest — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:07:48 +0000

I have to say, though: I always wondered about those women’s families. That was always so strange to me, that they didn’t seem to be attached to anything but each other. I mean, where did they spend Christmas? Didn’t they call their mothers once a week or something? I wonder if Carrie will have actual parents in the book. Or maybe we’ll learn where all that neediness originated …

By: guest

guest — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:01:28 +0000

I read this in my local paper, and what I thought was not the beating a dead horse thing but the audience thing. To want to go back in time with Carrie, you would’ve had to have been following Sex and the City, but these are pre-teen-type books. Even if they have teenagers in them, the main audience would be those girls who are just younger (or quite a bit younger) than the characters in the book. And the idea that that audience would be familiar with SATC is either ridiculous and overlooked or disturbingly inappropriate.

By: guest

guest — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:35:02 +0000

ugh, make it stop. I agree with guest #1 – the show was awesome, but they’re just squeezing water from a stone.
The movie was enough to put the series to bed for most of its fans. These books really can’t beat the show – they shouldn’t even try.

By: kelleyd

kelleyd — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:32:39 +0000

Oh my god, Flight of the Navigator! Yesyesyesyesyes!
This is why I love you guys!

By: guest

guest — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:52:16 +0000

guest #1 could not agree more.

By: guest

guest — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:56:01 +0000

Kinda looks like Haylie Duff

By: guest

guest — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:39:42 +0000

Don’t get me wrong, I love SATC as much as the next girl but isn’t this beating a dead horse? Time to move on…