Blake, Coming to a Magazine Near You

Oct 29, 2008 @ 10:35am

blake livey from gossip girl asking whats wrong with you with just her face.jpg This just in from the caf:

"Blake Lively spotted lunching at 4 Times Square, with a certain fashion assistant and her manager in tow. She was there for a fitting, but with which magazine, I'm not sure..."

A little math: Couldn't be Lucky, since she was just on their January cover, and she was just on Teen Vogue's March. Realistically, that would only leave Glamour, Allure and Vogue.

Oh yeah, the rest of that conversation:

"I think the assistant might have been that girl from Vogue".

But we highly doubt it could be for the cover - right?

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 10:42AM

Well actually, it wouldn't only leave those three. You forgot Vanity Fair (but she's already been on the cover), probably not Details or SELF, but very likely it may be for GQ or W.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 10:55AM

i hope it's not for the cover of vogue!

slightly off-topic, but i guess not really, maybe a little bit...
why is it that neither of the olsens have ever been on the cover of vogue?

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 11:30AM

i really hope its not for vogue or W. girls like her are better reserved for the covers of US weekly and People.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 11:30AM

apparently she ONLY does covers now. (such a joke) so it's def for someone's cover.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 11:30AM

she's a cute girl, but not a vogue girl.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 11:32AM

I really hope it's not for Vogue or W. She's more of a People or US Weekly cover. If they just absolutely need to put a Gossip Girl on the cover, at least have it be Leighton Meester.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 11:33AM

she's a cute girl, but not a vogue girl.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 11:41AM

guest #1--Details and W are in another building with their own fancy(ish) cafeteria so it's probably not those two titles!

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 11:48AM

it's 100% w. you didn't hear it from me.

posted by valenlb

Oct 29, 2008 12:20PM

I think if Vogue was going to put someone from Gossip Girl on their cover, Leighton Meester or Jessica Zhor would be much better candidates...

posted by valenlb

Oct 29, 2008 12:20PM

I think if Vogue was going to put someone from Gossip Girl on their cover, Leighton Meester and Jessica Zhor would be much better candidates...

posted by amandabug

Oct 29, 2008 12:28PM

this week's nymag recap of gg says leighton was shot two weeks ago for a teen vogue cover.

posted by HeatherChandler

Oct 29, 2008 12:45PM

I would love it if Leighton were on the cover of Vogue. Blake seems like a nice young lady but I'd rather learn/see more of Leighton in quality magazines.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 12:48PM

oh please no!

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 12:58PM

It should definitely be Leighton Meester! I do love Blake but she's not defined enough...I think she needs a few more years before she's Vogue or W ready! Leighton was ready like yesterday.
And hell no to Jessica Szohr - her character annoys the hell out of me and its not the fault of the character, its the way Jessica plays her.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 1:35PM

sorry to burst your anti-blake bubble, but it's for vogue. met her, i work in the building (but not at vogue).

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 1:52PM

I doubt it will be a Vogue cover but something inside the March issue.

Not W because W is in the Third Avenue CN building.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 1:53PM

I think Blake would be fab on the cover of Self.

Leighton on Vogue would be to die for.

posted by fauvism3

Oct 29, 2008 2:57PM

did anyone else notice that ALL the current vogue fashion assistants have first names beginning with S? totally random tidbit but weird nonetheless. Whose assistant was it? Serena Nikkhah? Sara Moonves?

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 3:04PM

It is for the FEb issue of Vogue... and her cover dress has already been narrowed down...

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 3:17PM

Is Blake on the cover of February Vogue an attempt to become relevant again? If it is that is a little tragic. Please, models on covers not CW TV stars.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 3:19PM

ha! i know the answer but you won't know until it hits news stands, get ready to be surprised

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 3:34PM

um, hello, wth the way Vogue's been going, would you really be all that suprised to see Heidi Montag on it?

posted by HeatherChandler

Oct 29, 2008 4:35PM

@ Guest 23

Oh dear...

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 5:30PM

Hmm well she and Leighton were in Vogue already, styled by Kathryn Neal Shaffer (who yes, is family). She seemed nice enough at the last fitting for that, but she didn't lunch at the cafeteria, I'm surprised she would (yummy as it is, I just can't see it?)

posted by Lala

Oct 29, 2008 6:34PM

I can tell you all that she has been shot for the cover of W magazine.

And no, The Olsen Twins have never been on the cover of any edition of Vogue.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 7:40PM

How is she even relevant? Blake is such a shitty actress; Leighton is much more deserving.

posted by guest

Oct 29, 2008 9:16PM

Leighton is so fucking overrated. I can't wait to see Blake's cover.

posted by guest

Oct 30, 2008 7:57AM

Excuse me #28? Blake is the one who is overrated. Her acting compared to Leighton's is shameful. Leighton should be getting covers, not Blake, who is favoured because she is the typical blonde/tanned/big-boobed Hollywood star.

posted by guest

Oct 30, 2008 9:11AM

Blake is awesome! I'm glad she's getting all the attention she deserves.

posted by guest

Oct 30, 2008 9:41AM

I am looking forward to seeing Blake on covers. I also hope that Leighton gets some too. They both deserve this, they are good girls.