Explain

Not Safe for America, but Totally Safe for Fashion

zac and miri make a porno.jpgHave you seen the posters for Zac and Miri Make a Porno?

They have little stick figures and say something like, “Seth Rogen and Elizabeth Banks made a movie so steamy/outrageous/titillating that this is all we can show you.”

We thought it was cute. But then we read that the original posters were just too scandalous for America, which is why they had to scratch the real life pictures and go with stick figures.

You can see the original at left, and we’d hardly call it “titillating”. Especially not compared to the gigantic Calvin Klein ad featuring a naked, writhing Eva Mendes outside our office, or the pages of men wearing Dolce & Gabbana skivvies in every magazine, or even the pictures of Angelina Jolie in this month’s W.

What would’ve happened if, when Tom Ford’s toe-sucking fragrance ads got banned, he broke out a sharpie and drew a stick figure’s toe in another stick figure’s mouth?

Um, hope you’ve already had lunch.

Comments

1

posted by soilikethelike

Oct 23, 2008 3:49PM

isn't this completely different though? the ads got banned because of the word "porno" not because of the photograph.

2

posted by soilikethelike

Oct 23, 2008 3:52PM

isn't this completely different though? the ads got banned because of the word "porno" not because of the photograph.

avatar
3

posted by guest

Oct 23, 2008 3:55PM

...um. The word "porno" is still on both posters.

Furthermore, if the objection was to the word, why would they have bothered to change the photograph to stick people?

avatar
4

posted by guest

Oct 23, 2008 4:02PM

its classic Kevin Smith. took him forever to get the board to understand that he didn't actually make a porno. Can't wait to see it.

avatar
5

posted by guest

Oct 23, 2008 4:03PM

its classic Kevin Smith. took him forever to get the board to understand that he didn't actually make a porno. Can't wait to see it.

avatar
6

posted by guest

Oct 23, 2008 4:03PM

although i agree it was a stupid reason to HAVE to change the poster, i like the new poster alot better.

7

posted by Britt Aboutaleb

Oct 23, 2008 4:16PM

the ads were initially banned because of the "graphic image". the movie's run into more trouble this week because now that it's about to come out american press and theatres are voicing concern over the word "porno"

8

posted by TyTy

Oct 23, 2008 4:28PM

weird objection. not like pornography is illegal here, so why would the word porno cause a stir?

avatar
9

posted by guest

Oct 23, 2008 5:13PM

Whatever, the second poster's funnier anyway.

avatar
10

posted by guest

Oct 23, 2008 6:39PM

haha, the states is so weird.
we have the first poster plastered all over toronto. loosen up guys!

avatar
11

posted by guest

Oct 23, 2008 9:21PM

Seriously?
You want to have to explain to your kids what a porno is during commercial breaks?

12

posted by allisonwrote

Oct 23, 2008 9:42PM

Yeah, #11, that "will somebody think of the children?!" argument is going to work real well here, since most Fashionista readers have kids.

x
allison

avatar
13

posted by guest

Oct 23, 2008 9:53PM

the original is what we have up here in canada.. but i wish we had the stick figures.. id probably wanna spend the money to see it..

avatar
14

posted by guest

Oct 23, 2008 10:18PM

why are there always attractive girls and... less attractive guys in movies like this?

15

posted by bananahana

Oct 23, 2008 10:34PM

to guest 10:18,
i'm not trying to make an assumptions but it probably favors the targeted audience, young males. how much could your average joe relate to an incredibly good looking actor?

and the attractive woman is there for an important reason, looking attractive.

16

posted by JesseCoccoli

Oct 24, 2008 12:25PM

ugh America. spend less time on censoring comedic billboards and more time on providing healthcare

avatar
17

posted by guest

Oct 24, 2008 1:15PM

Tom Ford is such a perv. I thought those perfume bottle in the crotch ads were awful.

Post Your Comment