People Are Talking

Love Is Blind. We Are Not. Internal Relations.

WHICH publishing house is quietly paying interns, but only if they’re “of a minority”? Not a whole lot of people know about it - because most of the interns, well, aren’t getting paid - but the ones that are, aren’t really in need. Does HR really assume that you need money based not on income but on your skin color? Guess so…

Comments

avatar
1

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 1:09PM

Haha wow this finally got out? It's Hearst.

avatar
2

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 1:13PM

This isn't an entirely terrible idea. The magazine industry is predominantly white. I've been told that they pay minority interns in hopes that they will continue to come back summer after summer (until they graduate from college). However, if you're really passionate about that career path, I'm sure they'd do it for free too.

3

posted by syako

Oct 01, 2008 1:18PM

Um. Can you say asking for lawsuits?

avatar
4

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 1:26PM

Well it's Hearst... but its not just for minorities..some interns are just in need and are getting paid as well..

avatar
5

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 1:30PM

well, i kinda wish i got paid when i was interning at hearst...and i'm a minority.

avatar
6

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 1:34PM

#4
how do they know they're in need? I don't recall any one asking me how much I made or my parents made a year at any interview.

avatar
7

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 1:34PM

Come on, that's ridiculous! People doing the same work should be paid the same. Period.

avatar
8

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 1:43PM

Are all minorities getting paid? Or just certain ones?

avatar
9

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 1:56PM

Certain ones for sure and not during the school year from what I've heard. Hmmm

avatar
10

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 2:18PM

how do you know this is true?

avatar
11

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 2:41PM

Either pay them all or don't pay anyone.

I think most interns (except Sean Avery) need payment of some form, regardless of 'minority' status.

avatar
12

posted by hipstersdontlie

Oct 01, 2008 3:55PM

Now all of a sudden race/color/ethnicity matters in fashion!

avatar
13

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 3:57PM

# 6 Income was in the paperwork you filled out

avatar
14

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 5:01PM

I interned at Hearst. I am of color. I did not get paid. I'm not wealthy. There are discrpepancies regarding who gets paid throughout all Pub companies from magazine to magazine regardless of color. Stupid blind item.

15

posted by xxi

Oct 01, 2008 5:23PM

#13

I've interned for Hearst and Fairchild and not once did I list what my family made or what I made in any paperwork that I filled out. I don't know anyone that ever has, my best friend interned at Conde Nast, never filled anything of that sort out either. I think this paid "system" is a luck of the draw program.

16

posted by FashionIntelligentsia

Oct 01, 2008 6:21PM

SIGN ME UP!

avatar
17

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 6:56PM

This has been happening at Hearst for at least the past 3 years. I'm a minority and I was a paid intern at Hearst. I got the internship through HR (who started the paying-program). We had special lunches, where we could meet the other minorities in this special program as well as meet with other people who worked at Hearst. All the others in this program were very intelligent, from top schools around the country, but I don't think any of us were really hurting for cash. However, I wasn't like the other interns at my magazine walking around in $700 shoes, and swinging a $2500 Chanel bag. I think it's widely understood that most people who get into fashion are white and from wealthy families. How else are you supposed to survive on 28k/year but to have mom and dad pay for everything? Whether it's right or wrong, this was only Hearsts way of trying to bring in more minorities to their predominantly white titles.

avatar
18

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 7:01PM

i think it's a matter of what the position is. for example, if it's in marketing , interns don't get paid. but if you're in accounting it's another story...yes?

avatar
19

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 7:42PM

#17

I understand better now. Thanks.

avatar
20

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 7:44PM

Please, no one's paying interns because they think the interns need the money - no one cares if they're poor or not. They're just trying to use market forces to encourage more people of color to enter the industry, especially as they are falling under increasing scrutiny by the public for being so visibly white. And are you really against having scholarships for minorities?

21

posted by xWesleighx

Oct 01, 2008 7:45PM

The Blind Item made news over @ Gawker:
http://www.gawker.com/

perma-link:
http://gawker.com/5057710/to-all-the-sad-young-white-media-interns-working-for-free

avatar
22

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 8:00PM

Yeah, it's definitely Hearst. They've had a paid minority intern program for a few years now. I really don't see how it's fair to pay some of your interns but not all.

avatar
23

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 8:02PM

Finally a blind item that I know! It's definitely Hearst... they've had a paid intern minority program for a few years now. I really don't see how it's fair to pay some of your interns but not all.

avatar
24

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 8:12PM

ahhh reverse discrimination..
from one extreme to another.

avatar
25

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 8:48PM

some of you are missing the point.

the original INTENTION behind the program might have been all rainbows and sunshine, but CLEARLY hearst has strayed from that.

they are using the premise falsely. "black" does not automatically equal "poor". to offer payment based on skin color alone is ridiculous and insulting.

did gawker really think they could call hearst and get an HONEST answer? lol. hearst probably gets a tax break for their "diversification" so let's face it people - the interns best interest is NOT their priority...

check yo'self before you wreck yo'self, hearst.

avatar
26

posted by guest

Oct 01, 2008 9:19PM

The interns in the program were by no means all black, at least not when I was there.

27

posted by TyTy

Oct 01, 2008 11:11PM

#25 -

minority does not necessarily equal black either.

28

posted by Peter

Oct 02, 2008 3:19AM

This mildly offends me as a white person

avatar
29

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 8:28AM

#27

you're right, minority does not equal black. but that doesn't change the fact the minority does not equal POOR.

avatar
30

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 10:16AM

You guys are missing the point, the point of the paid internship program is to encourage minority participation..and minority in this sense happens to be anything other than white, seeing as Hearst...like the majority of the fashion industry is WHITE.

Unless you don't mind the all-white industry, I can't see why this would be a problem.

avatar
31

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 10:40AM

I think everyone is missing the point here...WHAT makes someone poor? I know someone from an upper middle class that was in this program but because she was of color, she was offered this program without ever being asked what her parents made. Either pay everyone or don't pay any one at all.

avatar
32

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 11:58AM

syako: SO why its a BLIND item. Also, if it really is Hearst, they are going to be IN THE SHIT. That's all I'm saying.

avatar
33

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 12:25PM

you people are ridiculous. affirmative action, please look it up. they are obviously not trying to recruit "poor" people. they are trying to recruit people of color. these are their corporate values. more power to them. how dare you be "offended"

avatar
34

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 12:50PM

I think Hearst is doing a good job they are trying to get minorities in fashion wich only is a good thing cause it was one of the all-white barriers. Time for change was so wrong about that ?? Go Hearst * and may there be many more to follow untill everything is equal.

avatar
35

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 1:00PM

I was a participant in this program as well, and it's by no means under the table... it's called the Hearst Diversity Fellowship and is listed on Columbia J-school's internship listings site. It was a very small program (because they didn't have a huge budget), but every other intern who wasn't getting paid was getting school credit. While school credit is nowhere near as good as getting paid (which was the only reason I took the internship), it's not as if the program participants were getting paid while the other 500 interns weren't getting anything...

avatar
36

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 1:17PM

It's not about the assumption that minorities are poor. It's creating incentive for minorities to stay with their company, which as #33 stated is simple HR affirmative action and completely fair.

The same way certain companies which have been traditionally male dominated now must maintain a respectable quota of male vs female employees with comparable pay scales... welcome to the year 2008 everyone.

37

posted by TyTy

Oct 02, 2008 1:27PM

#29 -

Right, because that's the point of the program?

avatar
38

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 1:34PM

#34, #35, #33, whoever:

Yes, if it is Hearst, good for them for trying to bring in people of color.

BUT the point here is - why should one get paid - without any attention to income? simply for being of color...

there inlies the insult.

I think it would be more admirable to bring in people who have talent and passion, but couldn't neccasarily AFFORD the opportunity to work in fashion. Minority or not.

- a person of color.

39

posted by syako

Oct 02, 2008 1:41PM

Why did you feel the need to call me out #32???? I didn't write the item, didn't claim to know who it was written about, I just said it seems like a tricky legal situation if the program is set up the way the post makes it out to be. Geez.

avatar
40

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2008 2:36PM

haha affirmative action is not ILLEGAL, therefore no law suits needed.

avatar
41

posted by dumbbrunette5

Oct 02, 2008 10:55PM

while i think the idea of trying to attract more minorities is perfectly fine i think they should find a non monetary way of doing it. because then you end up with white people who have no chance of interning there because they cant afford it without getting paid, and minorities who are well off getting paid to do intern when they could have easily done without the money. and yes, i know someone said school credit but i know that at least at my school you have to pay extra to get credit for your internships which really screws people over if the internship only takes people who are getting credit for it. so..i think people should try and find some sort of non monetary incentive to keep minorities coming back as interns.

avatar
42

posted by guest

Oct 06, 2008 1:09PM

In a year, how many Hearst magazines have people of color on the covers? How many PoCs grace the pages as models, writers, photographers? The number is sickeningly small. The fashion industry is totally whitewashed, which I find boring. If Hearst is trying to change this, even just a little bit, through a legit (if openly affirmative action) scholarship program, far be it from anyone to complain! And guys, think about it; no company, in ANY industry, pays some workers more because they are poorer, and some workers less because they have more money already. The money in the scholarship was used as an incentive.

Post Your Comment