posted by guest

Oct 21, 2008 5:41PM

why can't you just post them for us? it'll just make everything easier and we'll actually know which items you're trying to refer to instead of just guessing.

posted by guest

Oct 21, 2008 6:00PM

1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes (and I have a pair)
5. Yes

Saw all your adventures in copyright when I was there today.

posted by fay

Oct 21, 2008 6:13PM

This is all getting a bit tedious.

We know high street stores knock off designer brands. And while it's generally worthwhile that you highlight direct copies of young and less established brands, it's hardly news that the big high street names have a similar version of *that* dress we all just saw go down the catwalk.

Yawn.

posted by bastylefilegirl

Oct 21, 2008 6:32PM

Let me know when they get Marni shoes...

posted by guest

Oct 21, 2008 6:49PM

Technically there is no copyright violation because apparel cannot be copyrighted. However, if their the clothing or bag has a pattern then that pattern can be copyrighted. The logos are trademarked and for the most part when people get in trouble it is for violating that trademark and the copyright of the logo not the design of the garment or bag.

posted by guest

Oct 21, 2008 7:10PM

i was so excited when i saw the chunky sweater dresses, but they looked absolutely hideous on. They make your shoulders look twice as wide and pretty much dont stay on your body. Dont they try them on actual people before they produce them?

posted by guest

Oct 21, 2008 7:45PM

which section do you refer to the copyright stuff? like is it the trend section?!? please can anypne help?

posted by guest

Oct 22, 2008 1:43AM

Hm. I thought it reminded me more of the Balenciaga jacket from last fall more than a generic Chanel jacket...