Looks like the 5% cut at Conde Nast has finally hit magazines other than those most closely associated with Vogue:
Portfolio‘s blog (which, you probably know, is owned by Conde Nast) reports that Lucky let three mid-level editors go today, though Conde Nast is still mum on any more details.
It’s no wonder the title might be facing some trouble – it bills itself as the magazine “about shopping,” an activity that’s seen better days given the current state of everybody’s checking accounts.
No word yet on exactly which editors were let go, or whether there will be more cuts at more Conde titles. But stay tuned.
Tags: Conde Nast, Economy, Lucky, Portfolio



Jason Wu for Target Fallout: 11,000 Items Currently on eBay and Two Re-Sellers Buy Out the Entire Collection in a Miami Target (We've Got Video)
Watch: Anna Wintour Defends Her 'Bitchiness' on 60 Minutes
Karl Lagerfeld Thinks Adele Is 'A Little Too Fat' and More Highlights from His Unfiltered Interview in the Metro
BB Creams Are the Hottest New Product to Hit the Beauty Aisle--Here's What They Can Do For You
Not a Good Look: Gisele Faces Backlash After Her Super Bowl Rant is Caught on Camera
I love Lucky but the items shown are usually ridiculously priced. I use it more like a lookbook.
It always sucks when people lose their jobs.
mid-level fashion editor, a mid-level beauty editor, and someone i think from art?