posted by fauvism3

Nov 11, 2008 4:43PM

Desperate times call for desperate measures. Nonetheless disappointing. But Vogue hasn't been the leader in fashion in a long time, maybe in ad sales , but that is changing as well.

Notice that ALL the fashion slugs on the cover involve either cheap clothing/gifts OR splurges that you will "wear forever." When the fashion goes InStyle, the features do as well.

posted by cesarcmma

Nov 11, 2008 5:29PM

Agree, and why Jennifer A. There are a lot others more interesting celebs that haven't get a cover.

posted by guest

Nov 11, 2008 5:33PM

Anna Wintour should be ashamed. It's a slippery slope from this point on, dear.

posted by guest

Nov 11, 2008 5:53PM

Omg. The ridiculous cover line aside, is it not about time everyone got over the whole Brad/Angelina/Jennifer thing? I mean how long ago did it happen? I, for one, didn't care at the time and I certainly don't care 3 years later!

Cute picture though.

posted by guest

Nov 11, 2008 6:27PM

fugly picture!! i puke on that cover & the whole story. vogue is so over!!

posted by stylecrusader

Nov 11, 2008 6:28PM

I would be so embarrassed if I were Jennifer Anniston. What are the Vogue people thinking? And they wonder why their ad pages are down...

posted by guest

Nov 11, 2008 6:55PM

Totally agree with Fashionista and the cover is awful!

posted by Lala

Nov 11, 2008 6:59PM

Good God!!!

I feel embarrassed for Aniston,that is NOT HER QUOTE!!!She did not say that, you cant quote someone directly and just add names and construct shit like that!!

This is the lowest of low, it was a terrible year for US Vogue covers, and this does take the cake, but i like the cover its the tagline that kills it!

Anna should be ashamed of herself!!!!

posted by doll

Nov 11, 2008 7:04PM

In my opinion, there are two readers of popular (like Elle or Vogue) fashion magazines:

Reader #1: is the regular woman, who probably likes to shop; but could care less about Rodarte, has an interest in "actresses" like Jennifer Aniston, and enjoys budget, realistic shopping features

Reader #2: is us, avid readers of fashion blogs who drool over studded skyscraper heels we could (probably) never afford, and would rather see supermodels on the covers of our publications

Miss Wintour is trying to get Reader #1 (who is admittedly a bigger reader base) but is in the process losing #2. There is no balance.

So while #1 is increasingly giving up magazines...
(my mom is a #1 for example, and said she hasn't bought a magazine for months)
...#2 will always covet her Paris Vogues and iDs in print.

I'm not sure if I'm making sense, but anyway...

Vogue should get back on track as THE fashion bible, basically.

Or maybe a smart idea would be less publications, like 1 for every 2 months and more web content...

I know the only issues I buy are "the fall one" and summer ones (for beach reading).

Sorry, just another random idea...blah blah blah.

AND AS WITH EVERYONE: I hate the cover, everything it stands for and so on and so forth.

posted by guest

Nov 11, 2008 7:14PM

cute dress. great rack. stupid tagline.

posted by guest

Nov 11, 2008 7:41PM

You know what, I completely agree. Fashion mag à la trash mag (prob #1).

Not to mention Vogue made a bad move by picking Jennifer (prob #2) to pose on a beach for a December issue (prob #3).

posted by guest

Nov 11, 2008 7:57PM

She needs to sell magazines (bad economic times call for desperate measures), you can look forward to more tabloid friendly stars in 2009...and recognizable TV stars as well. I wouldn't be surprised if one of the Gossip Girls made it on the cover, probably Blake Lively.

posted by kelleyd

Nov 11, 2008 9:52PM

Vogue pretty blatantly gave up on producing quality features a while ago. Anybody notice how their editorials all feature looks by exactly one designer? I'm betting that's due more to ad dollars than to artistic laziness.

I think, in order to maintain its reputation as the premier US fashion mag, Vogue needs to go back to its roots. Let's face it: the every-woman they're catering to now
1) can get SO much more juiciness from Star, without having to deal with Vogue's pretension, and
2) is not as INVESTED in the way Jenn's love life turns as we are in the percolations of the fashion scene. Gossip is a dispensable indulgence. Fashion is SERIOUS BUSINESS.
So, once again, Vogue needs to refocus. We need editorials with creativity, exploration of trends that is relevant to be both fashion addicts and the less adventurous. Most of all, we need CLASS. Vogue used to embody that word and now...they kind of insult it. If, in producing these things, Vogue has to quietly decrease circulation, so be it. Once the publication regains its reader base, there'll be more than enough money for expansion.

posted by kelleyd

Nov 11, 2008 9:55PM

Also, AHHHHHHPHOTOSHOPISSOPAINFUL!!! I can't even look at Annie Leibovitz's stuff anymore.

posted by guest

Nov 11, 2008 10:10PM

I thought the EXACT same thing after seeing the cover on their website!! Personally, I would be embarrassed to be holding that issue of Vogue.

posted by guest

Nov 12, 2008 2:36AM

NEWSFLASH: Photoshop has become the norm. ALL the leading magazines have it on the agenda just as they have the original photoshoot scheduled. They take a natural beauty like Aniston & do uneccessary tweaks in the pursuit of our society's idea of perfection. Such a shame.

Jen is a lovely girl just as she is & oh, btw... I'm sure she's not happy with Vogue for taking what was a graciously minimalistic statement (all things considered) & using it to their bottom line advantage by blowing it out of proportion. It's journalists/writers like that who give the rest of us a bad name.

Vogue should apologize to Jen for misrepresenting the context of what she actually said. As for Angie, well she knows what she did was in fact UNcool. Still though , I wish her the best for the sake of the children.

crazy88auto.com
livingwithbadcredit.com

posted by guest

Nov 12, 2008 3:47AM

1. Aniston is so old and ugly(that cover pic makes me scared...)!!! so she should never have landed on Vogue...
2. Vogue shouldn't have asked her nor should she have spoke about Angelina and Brad... it's so OK, PEOPLE whatever...

posted by guest

Nov 12, 2008 7:46AM

It's a very slippery slope that Vogue's on right now. I guess when you're desperate for readership, you'll try anything to attract any audience...
I'm soooo tried of Jennifer Aniston going on and on and on about Branjelina. Give it up already!And what's with the editors still thinking that her story about this is worth reading?
I guess the proof will be in what the December sales are like.
I usually love the December Vogue and make a point of buying it. With this cover, I won't.
Maybe I'll just go straight to US weekly.

posted by trytryagainn

Nov 12, 2008 11:34AM

aniston was on her way to back to classy & it's sad to see that image tarnished by hating on angelina 3 years after the fact.
it's time to move on - clearly brad did!

if vogue keeps this up both the actress & the mag are on their way from classy to classless.

posted by guest

Nov 12, 2008 12:57PM

Vogue is really becoming a waste of paper. Too many celebrity covers, too many socialites. There are so many fantastic models (current and past) that are so much more relevant than Jennifer Aniston (with all due respect to her). That headline is so unbelievably low class. As for #18's comment that she is so "old and ugly" is pretty harsh. Since when are one's 30's (or even 40's) considered that old?

posted by guest

Nov 12, 2008 1:03PM

it's amazing to see the hating on aniston for talking about a topic that she was asked about. and i can bet that not even 3/4 of the commentors here even READ the article much less know what the quote is directed at. it's always so easy to be nasty from behind the anonymity of a computer screen isn't it?

posted by guest

Nov 12, 2008 1:12PM

I actually cant wait to get the vogue. I think that the cover is terrible, however its great to see how MORE vogue can dissapoint me each month. There is nothing new or fresh or fun. its funny, i worked at elle and it wasnt my favorite magazine. But since I left i have been reading it religiously and loving it. The reason why elle is doing so well is that its a fashion magazine for every woman similar to British Vogue - its balenciaga and gap, its H&M and prada its accessible!! I am so sick of rreading about socialites - its so annoying and honestly, who cares?

posted by guest

Nov 12, 2008 2:43PM

Yes, lame that the pull quote is misleading AND on the cover, but more disappointing to me is that Jennifer Aniston is the cover model. What? I don't get Vogue to read about mildly talented actresses who have movies to promote. Seriously. And I definitely could care less about Angeline/Brad/Jen.

Also (on a separate but related note), I was very disappointed Beyonce was this month's InStyle cover model -- talk about a snooze-fest of an interview... she's so keen on being politically correct that she comes off as incredibly bland and uninteresting. To me anyway. Maybe we'll get a good cover sometime soon...

posted by hannah

Nov 12, 2008 5:20PM

Ew. I'm sorry but Jennifer Aniston is not relevant, ESPECIALLY to a supposed fashion magazine like Vogue. I wish Vogue was able to sacrifice some of it's housewife market and stop using celebrities on the covers. And also, as mentioned, stop mentioning socialites. Invite back creative styling, drop some of the pretension, and be a bit more like Paris Vogue or at least like Elle. "What Angeline did was very uncool" should never, ever be on Vogue. Neither should "Holiday Romance", at least unironically. This is a mess.

posted by guest

Nov 13, 2008 2:11AM

Oh I couldn't agree more with all of those who commented before me. VOGUE damn it I want fashion! I crave, love and LIVE for fashion! Not boring middle aged ex divorcees, talking about lackluster movies and lackluster love lives..I couldn't be more disappointed. And what about diversity?! GOD

posted by guest

Nov 13, 2008 9:34AM

ughhhhhh i am so over this fued between them. yeah it was a sucky situation and yeah i will always prefer angelina to jennifer so why do we need to keep bringing this shiz up. like everyone else who posted, i think that the interview could have centered moer around fashion and jennifer's style. obviously desperate times call for desperate measures. Vogue is feeling the heat.

posted by guest

Nov 18, 2008 2:11PM

I seriously could not AGREE more with all the comments regarding Vogue heading (quickly) down a slippery slope. Talk about alienating your readers! I am BLOWN AWAY that Vogue printed that quote, and on their cover nonetheless!! What the hell are they thinking doing this....as much as I dislike Jennifer Aniston, I think they should apologize to her as well. If I were her, I would be personally horrified that that quote was next to my picture. National Enquirer, here we come!! What people want is FASHION...not some irrelevant actress! Where are the models? I love reading about them and seeing all their photos...not Jennifer Aniston...ugh I feel like she's such a has-been. Can someone tell me that people are seriously interested in her life or her boring movies? She is sooo OVER....btw...her hair looks like shit...

posted by guest

Nov 18, 2008 2:14PM

Seeing this cover completely validated my decision to abandon any ideas of subscribing to this now sub-par magazine. I hope someone at Vogue is reading all these comments and taking them into consideration, VOGUE needs immediate resurrection.