posted by etoilee8

Dec 11, 2008 1:43PM

It's a tie for me! I think they are both really fantastic. Good for Jen, god knows I'm sick of the press making her out to be such a miserable crybaby. She looks way hot, get 'em girl.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 1:44PM

"Little bunny, Foo Foo
Hopping through the forest
Scooping up the field mice
And bopping them on the head"

So true.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 2:02PM

im dissapointed in jennifer for doing that. I would think she had a little more self respect for herself and wouldnt need this kind of cheap attention at this point in her career.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 2:02PM

anouck's cover looks great. Jen's makes me LOL. and let's please address the elephant in the room-- her boobs look ridonculous (and not in a good way). Also love how it's a patriotic-themed issue but there's no mention of barack anywhere on the cover...but there is an article on the last days of bush's presidency. jennifer aniston + bush...no wonder the world hates us. thanks gq!

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 2:04PM

@5 they mention barack in the top right corner...

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 2:10PM

I didn't even realize that was Jen! It looked like Kristin Cavallari or an indeterminate Simpson sister at first.

posted by TyTy

Dec 11, 2008 2:27PM

Jen's cover is far more charming.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 2:30PM

Je prefere Anouck, bien sur!

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 2:30PM

Wow, Jennifer looks really slutty there. Sorry.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 3:19PM

She needs to go away now.
No matter how much she tries to sexify herself, she comes off looking desperate.
I don't hate her, I'm just very tired of seeing her on EVERY BLOODY COVER!

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 3:31PM

I think J. Aniston would look fine if her hands weren't so extraordinarily awkward. Also, I agree about being tired of seeing her everywhere, nude or not.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 3:41PM

I think J. Aniston would look fine if her hands weren't so extraordinarily awkward. Also, I agree about being tired of seeing her everywhere, nude or not.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 5:18PM

Anouck for sure: her awkward pose is still pretty and high fashion. Jen's is...girl next door meets Peter Rabbit??

posted by cesarcmma

Dec 11, 2008 5:49PM

Anouck s'il vous plaît! she scream high fashion while Jen's face looks very photoshopped.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 6:47PM

why does that look nothing like jen anniston?

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 7:10PM

anouck, bien sur

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 7:11PM

anouck, bien sur

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 7:11PM

anouck, bien sur

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 7:55PM

bend and snap?

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 8:09PM

Hahahah, "bend and snap"

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 8:55PM

Jennifer Anniston is grossly overrated, not to mention a shitty actress.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 10:27PM

Agree with 4 and 10. Jen is so desperate.

posted by guest

Dec 11, 2008 10:51PM

I've never understood the Jen fascination. She's average-looking. Also, those are not her boobs. The woman must be a boob thief, because I just saw her spread in American Vogue, and she was boy-chested. Somewhere, a D-cup cries over her lost assets.

posted by Pretty Young Thing

Dec 11, 2008 11:52PM

Hahaha way to pull out the "Little Bunny Foo Foo" reference #3...I like Anouck's better. It could totally have come out of Paris Vogue or Numero just as much as Playboy. And I thought the same thing about Aniston's chest...seriously where'd that come from?!

posted by guest

Dec 12, 2008 2:25AM

Sorry guys, but I'm definitely going to say Jennifer wins. I could care less about her career, but as far as the photo goes she is far more sexy, lean but not stick thin. She has a killer body that she works for and it pays off.

How can you be "disappointed" in her? The female body is beautiful!!! Especially when it's in that kind of shape, why not show it off?

posted by formerlyknownasguest

Dec 12, 2008 8:55AM

It's strange that Jennifer Aniston is on the cover of GQ naked. What other purpose does this serve then to garner publicity for her and possibly - though highly unlikely due to the internet -increase magazine sales of GQ???? NONE! Therefore my conclusion is that she is desperate for attention and to eagerly shed any remnants of Brad Pitt and her "poor me" image.

Anyway I prefer the playboy cover over the FHM I mean GQ cover...

posted by guest

Dec 12, 2008 5:35PM

you guys do realize that jen is promoting her new movie...if it seems like she "wants attention", it's for the publicity of marley and me.

posted by guest

Dec 12, 2008 11:31PM

I think - besides the bunny hands (WTF?) it comes down to the lighting setup. Jen has a potentially good photo, but the lighting says "good girl next door" which makes it feel more dirty and playboy-ish. Anouck all the way for me.

posted by Mahalia

Dec 13, 2008 4:24AM

Jen just looks like a naked woman trying to sell something. Nothing particularly spunky or in charge about that. He cutesy praying mantis pose is too much for me, though. What a creepy woman.

posted by Mahalia

Dec 13, 2008 4:24AM

Jen just looks like a naked woman trying to sell something. Nothing particularly spunky or in charge about that. He cutesy praying mantis pose is too much for me, though. What a creepy woman.

posted by sarim2

Dec 13, 2008 5:58AM

anouck... looks like it could resemble somewhat a high fashion advert...