posted by Justina

Jan 22, 2009 3:19PM

Finally an Adventures in Copyright that actually makes sense!

Also, she is an idiot.

posted by AmandaMichele

Jan 22, 2009 3:46PM

Why would Vogue promote that silly thing to go with a $700 dress and $550 shoes? I wonder how much the advertisers give to Vogue to inspire that decision.

posted by guest

Jan 22, 2009 3:46PM

Dollars to doughnuts she hasn't even seen the thing. Whoever was hired to design the line should be embarrassed, though.

posted by guest

Jan 22, 2009 6:47PM

Jessica Simpson's entire livelyhood is now based on ripping of designers

have you seen her shoe line, they are actually pretty decent knockoffs

posted by guest

Jan 22, 2009 7:46PM

A: what are the odds Jessica actually 'designs' her line...yeah

B: what are the odds Jessica has the mental capacity to remember Miu Miu spring 06?

posted by guest

Jan 22, 2009 10:52PM

agree with comment 5, all of her stuff is just knock offs of the popular designer stuff. Some of it is actually pretty decent, but I kind of refuse to give her any of my money, on moral principle of course.

posted by guest

Jan 23, 2009 12:42AM

wow guest 7:46 you are harsh. i know she has a very public personality but that was a very low insult. yes her shoe and bag line do resemble other designers work, but did i believe i saw an adventures in copyright on our beloved topshop

posted by guest

Jan 23, 2009 12:42AM

wow guest 7:46 you are harsh. i know she has a very public personality but that was a very low insult. yes her shoe and bag line do resemble other designers work, but did i believe i saw an adventures in copyright on our beloved topshop

posted by guest

Jan 23, 2009 12:42AM

wow guest 7:46 you are harsh. i know she has a very public personality but that was a very low insult. yes her shoe and bag line do resemble other designers work, but did i believe i saw an adventures in copyright on our beloved topshop

posted by guest

Jan 23, 2009 12:43AM

oh my sorry did not mean to post that many times

posted by guest

Jan 23, 2009 2:09AM

Usually, when someone makes something similar to what is on the runway, there is some variation. I see basically the same thing. That's quite unfortunate.

posted by bastylefilegirl

Jan 23, 2009 11:09AM

2006 and it's 2009 and since the copyright laws on designs are nonexistant I don't see what the huge deal is...I mean it is clearly a knockoff but 3 years later I don't see what the huge fuss is. If this was done in 2006 I could see the issue!

posted by bastylefilegirl

Jan 23, 2009 11:12AM

let me clarify I'm not saying it's right, but it's not going to hurt Miu Miu financially due to the fact that it's an old design.

posted by guest

Jan 23, 2009 11:48AM

bastylefilegirl - I'd be a bit upset if I were toting around my 2006 Miu Miu and someone asked if it was by Jessica Simpson.

And is it really that hard to create a bag that isn't practically identical (aside from the colour and, I would assume, the quality)?

posted by guest

Jan 24, 2009 5:15AM

It would not surprise me if it was a knockoff, but got to say the Prada looks totally inspired itself by an old vintage bag I got in a flea market ;) my bag is black and must be late 60s or so.

posted by guest

Jan 24, 2009 3:53PM

I don't think anyone would notice you were carrying around a 2006 miu miu bag, or a miu miu bag...

posted by adora

Jan 30, 2009 8:35PM

Horrifying.