News

Men’s Vogue, Meet Lady Vogue

robert downey jr saves mens vogue.jpgIn October, we reported that Men’s Vogue would be absorbed into normal Vogue.

We figured the boy copy would get thrown in with the girl copy - a supplement a la Fashion Rocks - but they’ve gotten more creative.

Vogue’s Publishing Director Tom Florio explained the final chapter (we hope) in the magazine’s saga. Twice a year, starting in April for the first time in its history, Vogue will publish a reverse cover. That means Gwyneth on one side and Robert Downey Jr. on the other (Note: We don’t actually know who Vogue’s April cover girl is).

It’s kind of a brilliant move because we’ll definitely read it if it’s stuck inside our regular Vogue even though we’ve never bought it before. And instead of shrinking into oblivion, its circulation will more than double. And Vogue should, of course, be thrilled with their extra ad pages.

The only thing we don’t get is this sentence from WWD: “But sources estimate there are about 25 ad pages so far, including Ralph Lauren on the second cover.” Is Ralph the second cover star? Because a Ralph ad can’t be on the cover. Someone explain, please.

Comments

avatar
1

posted by guest

Jan 09, 2009 10:10AM

typically when selling ad space all the pages behind the covers are referred to as cover 1, cover 2 and so on...so, ralph on the second cover merely means that they hold the ad space behind the second cover.

avatar
2

posted by guest

Jan 09, 2009 10:21AM

Oh God u guys...they obviously mean that the ad behind the cover page will be a Ralph Lauren one!

avatar
3

posted by guest

Jan 09, 2009 12:13PM

do you guys do any research or, um, actual reporting? increasingly, this blog is the definition of lazy journalism.

avatar
4

posted by guest

Jan 09, 2009 12:44PM

s-u-c-k guest 3 go away!

avatar
5

posted by guest

Jan 09, 2009 1:25PM

I love guest 3!

6

posted by Malibu

Jan 09, 2009 4:33PM

I don't think theyre going to get any new customers ( im assuming theyre aim is the male demographic) by putting men's vogue on the back. No man is going to carry around Vogue just to read the men's section

7

posted by Malibu

Jan 09, 2009 4:33PM

I don't think theyre going to get any new customers ( im assuming theyre aim is the male demographic) by putting men's vogue on the back. No man is going to carry around Vogue just to read the men's section

avatar
8

posted by guest

Jan 09, 2009 5:44PM

hear hear for guests 1 2 and 3
Britt wears denim shorts and tshirts.

avatar
9

posted by guest

Jan 09, 2009 7:49PM

If you don't like this blog then don't waste your time coming here to complain about it. If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say it all.

avatar
10

posted by guest

Jan 10, 2009 11:47AM

guest 9: if you're saying that your blog is a fashion authority, then you should get basic stuff right and it's OK for readers to call you on it!

BTW, guest 6 (&7!) makes a really good point.

avatar
11

posted by guest

Jan 11, 2009 6:09AM

I completely agree with guest 10. Its just frustratig (and also kinda embarassing for you guys) that you have a blog specialising in fashion, when its begining to become apparent that what makes you guys fashionistas is that you like fashionable clothes and not because you have any real industry knowledge. You could learn a lot from BoF.

avatar
12

posted by guest

Jan 11, 2009 8:53PM

haha yeah
and the people that write here are snobby
agree with guest 11

avatar
13

posted by guest

Jan 12, 2009 2:24PM

what does knowing about ad-selling have to do with fashion industry knowledge? this thread sounds to me like a bunch of whiny ad girls venting their frustrations about not being fashion editors themselves...

Post Your Comment