Quote of the Day

There are too many stories about socialites — or, at any rate, too few such stories that sufficiently demonstrate why we should care about these creatures. What once felt like a jolly skip through Bergdorf now feels like an intravenous feed. To read Vogue in recent years is to wonder about the peculiar fascination for the “villa in Tuscany” story. Ditto staff-member accounts of spa treatments and haircuts. - From Cathy Horyn’s “What’s Wrong with Vogue,” in the New York Times.

Comments

1

posted by hannah

Jan 01, 2009 4:39PM

Good for her for bringing it up--it's true, Vogue needs some renovations and the removal of those BORING socialite articles. Something about it just seems so stale....

2

posted by astralgirl02

Jan 01, 2009 5:09PM

A-men, Cathy... thank you for speaking the truth. Vogue is as stale as supermarket bagels... by positioning the magazine as a shopping guide for bored socialites, they've taken all of the fun out of fashion.

No wonder that the Russian, French, and *gasp* the British counterparts to Vogue are much more fresh, and considered to be the TRUE arbiters of contemporary fashion/style.

Oh well, hopefully Anna will be dusting off her resume soon...

avatar
3

posted by disneyrollergirl

Jan 01, 2009 6:08PM

I think it would be nice to see some newer, more innovative photographers. I'm also SO bored of those jumpy studio (David Sims?) shoots they do EVERY month. Yawn! I actually like their features - the health articles are usually great and all the smaller fashion features are always informative. Even the elaborate country house features are fabulous although I agree, once you've seen one you've seen 'em all. Really not interested in socialites at all.

avatar
4

posted by guest

Jan 01, 2009 6:26PM

Yeah it like we all complain about whatever celeb they put on the front of the cover but the issue is really so much deeper than that. They could keep the cover appealing to the masses AND improve the fashion and make it more exciting.

avatar
5

posted by guest

Jan 01, 2009 6:38PM

OOOR maybe instead of a celebrity on the cover they can try a model for a change. i know the magazine is very old, but i don't think they have to worry about appealing to their first original readers.

avatar
6

posted by guest

Jan 01, 2009 8:59PM

loved the article but did anyone else find it odd that she quotes Magnus Berger a former boyfriend of Julia Restoin Roitfeld with no mention of their relationship?

7

posted by Modupe

Jan 01, 2009 11:15PM

finally someone syas it...
and i totally agree withguest @6:38 pm

avatar
8

posted by guest

Jan 01, 2009 11:29PM

Can someone post the picture of "Nadia Auermann having sex with a swan...referring to the Helmut Newton picture from the early ’90s"? Really, is the photograph that "subversive"?

avatar
9

posted by guest

Jan 02, 2009 1:28AM

Ditto what guest 8 said!

avatar
11

posted by guest

Jan 02, 2009 5:31AM

british vogue isn't all that wonderful either...or elle...theres a few articles on interesting designers/culture that make you willing to read and the editorials are generally good. However there are FAR too many articles on girls who only seem to party and wear the same clothes as all other girls their age. How can these people have anything interesting to say? And the articles are so fawning, it gets quite sickening. The articles on "self improvement" (eg diets, non surgical procedures, surgery) manage to be disturbing and dull. Decembers Fantasy issue with photography by Tim Walker kept me buying UK Vogue, but every month it gets more like reading a weekly.

avatar
12

posted by guest

Jan 02, 2009 7:17AM

Interesting article but clearly Vogue remains number one in terms of readers,advertisers and design houses.
Clearly they are doing something right(particularly if one contrasts it against their competition).

avatar
13

posted by guest

Jan 02, 2009 9:39AM

I think the Newton/Auermann 'swan' photo was fairly 'subversive' for its time and about as subversive as American Vogue ever got (unless someone has any evidence to the contrary).
American Vogue has always seemed to take the 'safer' approach to fashion.To me, fashion isn't about safety. That's why I find Paris Vogue,FQ and V more interesting to read. But then again, I don't know that the other publications have the same responsibility to advertisers that American Vogue seems to have.
I agree with Cathy that the endless stream of socialites and celebs make one issue of Vogue fade into the next. I also find that feature articles are tired rehash from other publications or their own archives.
I did buy the January issue (couldn't bring myself to do December with Jennifer Aniston)and thought it was OK but safe....again.
I can't say that when I'm looking for inspiring fashion, that I think American Vogue.
If Anna Wintour is smart, she'll take Cathy Horyn's article seriously. It boldly states what many Vogue readers are really thinking.

avatar
14

posted by guest

Jan 02, 2009 9:40AM

Wintour is so referencing Leda and the Swan.

avatar
15

posted by guest

Jan 02, 2009 9:55AM

Paging the ghost of Diana Vreeland!

avatar
16

posted by guest

Jan 02, 2009 11:19AM

Guest 13, are you talking about Canada's FQ magazine or is there another FQ?

avatar
17

posted by guest

Jan 02, 2009 12:18PM

Guest 14: yes, that's the point. Newton was deliberately referencing Leda and the Swan.

avatar
18

posted by guest

Jan 02, 2009 2:57PM

Another fashion swan moment: Bjork's swan dress by Marjan Pejoski.

And let's not forget... the Ugly Duckling turned into a beautiful swan!

Three fashion swan examples - that is a trend piece, right?

~Carrie Louise

avatar
19

posted by fashionfix

Jan 02, 2009 4:11PM

vogue has become boring. while there have been some amazing and relevant features (michelle obama, etc.) i'm so OVER the whole socialite fixation.

who cares?!

enough with tinsley, samantha boardman and that lauren chick who married that south american billionaire. it's sad enough that i even know who these people are and i put the blame squarely on american vogue. it's insulting to think that this is what us readers care about. please stop. unless one of these socialites wins a nobel or pulitzer or something.

oh, and another thing. please stop putting the same people/actresses on the cover over and over again. keira knightly needs to be ban from vogue entirely.

i'm glad i fluent in french, so i can read Paris Vogue.

/end rant.

avatar
20

posted by guest

Jan 03, 2009 3:19AM

I adore the Jeffrey Steingarten articles, though. And the, erm, "Moment of Zen" :) bit they do on the last page.

21

posted by guccigirl77

Jan 03, 2009 4:02PM

i used to be obbsessed with vogue..but they r so going down hill and i totally agree

Post Your Comment