Fashion Is Fun

Narciso Was as the Oscars

narciso was at the oscars.jpgWhen the last look came out at the Narciso show on Raquel last Wednesday night, everyone kind of oohed and we wondered who would be the first lucky girl to rock his sequined ballerina look (because we knew this one practically came with a sign that would read,”Photograph me, you know you want to”).

And everyone was right - the dress has already had its first real world appearance, at the Oscars exactly four days after its runway debut, on actress Rachel Weisz.

But now the real question remains: Who’ll be the second to wear this dress, and land themselves on Who-Wore-It-Better’s across the country?

Comments

avatar
1

posted by guest

Feb 24, 2009 3:56PM

My, what a perfectly awful dress. Shiny eighties sports-bra meets girdle meets tablecloth.

avatar
2

posted by guest

Feb 24, 2009 4:13PM

well weiss looks ridiculous next to raquel, especially with those sandals going halfway up her leg. stumpy calves anyone? rachel's gorgeous and those shoes legit chop her in half.

avatar
3

posted by guest

Feb 24, 2009 4:26PM

I think it only works with the white tights. Who ever wheres it next i pray to god its not Lindsey Lohan or Mischa Barton. Actually do all designers think that bad pubicity is better than none? Meaning do they mind even if the celebrity looks bad in there clothes?

avatar
4

posted by guest

Feb 24, 2009 5:31PM

she works it as well as Michelle Obama did hers....Narciso should stick to dressing size 4 and under.
fluff chance
http://emperorsoldclothes.blogspot.com

avatar
5

posted by guest

Feb 24, 2009 5:47PM

I don't agree with any of you commenters, and I'm not saying that to be body positive or whatever. The first thing I thought when I saw those pics was that the dress looked so much better on a non-emaciated figure.

But, yes, the shoes suck.

avatar
6

posted by guest

Feb 24, 2009 5:48PM

I don't agree with any of these comments, and I'm not saying that to be body positive or whatever. The first thing I thought when I saw those pics was that the dress looked so much better on a non-emaciated figure.

But, yes, the shoes suck.

Oh, and number 4, I'm sure Weisz is a size 4.

avatar
7

posted by guest

Feb 24, 2009 6:22PM

I think that the actual picture is bad. Was/is there video of her wearing it? I mean, in the picture, it looks like some forever 21-esque concoction (the color order and proportion scream forever 21 ripping off marc by marc) but I'm sure in real life, it looked dope. I think the flash/lighting is kind of washing everything out. Also,with the length and shape of the dress, those shoes weren't the smartest idea...

avatar
8

posted by guest

Feb 24, 2009 10:23PM

hate to burst your bubble #6 but if she's a four then Bush must still be president. Get real.The shoes are not the only thing in that picture that suck.Are you looking at the same photograph that we all are?
Fluff Chance
http://emperorsoldclothes.blogspot.com/

avatar
9

posted by guest

Feb 25, 2009 12:03AM

I don't love the dress, and it definitely doesn't flatter the lovely Ms. Weisz. It's such an awkward length on her.

Post Your Comment