Fashion Is Fun

Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009 / 3:59 PM

who wore it better balmain part deux.jpg


Fashionista in your inbox

Subscribe to our free email newsletter and get the best fashion, style, and beauty news and tips.

Comments [76]

obviously jennifer. but why should either of them matter. they are both ridiculous for wearing the shoes! you cant have both.. one ro the other

jennifer is skinnier and Anna is manly, Therefore its Jennifer.

jennifer is skinnier and Anna is manly, Therefore its Jennifer.

I hate fur, but ADR rocks this one.

I hate fur, but ADR rocks this one.

I hate fur, but ADR rocks this one.

Well, aside from Anna’s accessories, they’re wearing the exact same thing.
On top of that, I’m pretty sure their outfit (no, it really doesn’t need to be plural) is pulled directly from the runway, which kind of voids the entire question.
And 14, I think Anna’s appeal probably stems from the fact that she can afford the entire Balmain collection. But who knows–maybe she has a really great personality.

Well, aside from Anna’s accessories, they’re wearing the exact same thing.
On top of that, I’m pretty sure their outfit (no, it really doesn’t need to be plural) is pulled directly from the runway, which kind of voids the entire question.
And 14, I think Anna’s appeal probably stems from the fact that she can afford the entire Balmain collection. But who knows–maybe she has a really great personality.

Well, aside from Anna’s accessories, they’re wearing the exact same thing.
On top of that, I’m pretty sure their outfit (no, it really doesn’t need to be plural) is pulled directly from the runway, which kind of voids the entire question.
And 14, I think Anna’s appeal probably stems from the fact that she can afford the entire Balmain collection. But who knows–maybe she has a really great personality.

ADR by a mile. Balmain is like made for her. J-Con just seems too plain for it, I dunno if that makes sense, but Balmain just doesn’t look right on her.

Lets be serious… ADR is an editor, I doubt she bought most of the of the pieces she’s been wearing.

Lets be serious… ADR is an editor, I doubt she bought most of the of the pieces she’s been wearing.

Lets be serious… ADR is an editor, I doubt she bought most of the of the pieces she’s been wearing.

Actually stylecrusader, if you read Garance Dore’s post where ADR invited her back to her apartment you’ll see ADR owns all her clothes (so many she has a second apartment next door just to store them all..)
http://www.garancedore.fr/en/2009/03/03/aurora-viviana-anna/
It’s more like the celeb on the right (haven’t a clue who she is) who is just borrowing the outfit.

Actually stylecrusader, if you read Garance Dore’s post where ADR invited her back to her apartment you’ll see ADR owns all her clothes (so many she has a second apartment next door just to store them all..)
http://www.garancedore.fr/en/2009/03/03/aurora-viviana-anna/
It’s more like the celeb on the right (haven’t a clue who she is) who is just borrowing the outfit.

Actually stylecrusader, if you read Garance Dore’s post where ADR invited her back to her apartment you’ll see ADR owns all her clothes (so many she has a second apartment next door just to store them all..)
http://www.garancedore.fr/en/2009/03/03/aurora-viviana-anna/
It’s more like the celeb on the right (haven’t a clue who she is) who is just borrowing the outfit.

They both look like fucking idiots.

They both look like fucking idiots.

They both look like fucking idiots.

Jennifer Connelly by a landslide.

Jennifer Connelly by a landslide.

Jennifer Connelly by a landslide.

Jennifer looks likes she’s waltzing out of Auschwitz…. you get the Bridget Jones reference, right?

Jennifer looks likes she’s waltzing out of Auschwitz…. you get the Bridget Jones reference, right?

Jennifer looks likes she’s waltzing out of Auschwitz…. you get the Bridget Jones reference, right?

ADR by a mile. Balmain is like made for her. J-Con just seems too plain for it, I dunno if that makes sense, but Balmain just doesn't look right on her.

Leave a comment