
Anna Della Russo, Balmain, Mary Kate Olsen, Who Wore it Better
posted by guest
Mar 19, 2009 11:46AM
Sorry 1 and 2, but I don't think, with an outfit like this, you should look strong. you should play up a softness, which MK exudes here. Don't get me wrong, ADR would kill it if this was a runway, but in the real world this dress don't need a strong look under it.
posted by mollymc18
Mar 19, 2009 12:06PM
I think ADR looks too fierce, as if she is trying too hard to match the strong attitude of the dress, and it just ends up looking overworked. I agree with #3, MK wears it much better, especially because she plays up the softness. I do like the choice of nude shoe, though I think a plain pump would have been better suited to the dress.
posted by guest
Mar 19, 2009 12:15PM
um, hello?? this was already written up by the magnificent Phyllis Nefler: http://fromthedeskofphyllis.blogspot.com/2009/03/whose-messin-with-anna.html
please get some new original posts
posted by guest
Mar 19, 2009 12:15PM
its so obv that guests 2-5 aren't familiar with balmania and all its glory. ADR kills this dress while MK looks timid. Get off it losers. Granted, MK does look good, but she stops there. Anna Della Russo looks confindetn, strong, and like shes enjoying the hell out of those pointed shoulders. Bravo! This is proof LA (and LA's natives) place second, if not last, on the hierarchy of chicness to the royals of fashion.
posted by lauraloveslagerfeld
Mar 19, 2009 1:43PM
its all about mk, she looks unreal! and i think poster 6 needs to chill out, there are some true haters on this site! ADR looks gorgeous, but i think it is a very young style of dress, therefore it fits mk better :)
posted by Pretty Young Thing
Mar 19, 2009 1:53PM
Hear hear #7! Haha sooo true. If you saw ADR on the street, you'd be awestruck by the chicness. MK is seriously lacking any fabulousness here and it makes the dress look bad.
posted by guest
Mar 19, 2009 2:07PM
Too bad commenter #6 that that stupid blog you posted can't comprehend the difference between Who's and Whose. The headline should be Who's (as in..who..is) Messing With Anna. Idiot.
But back to the post at hand. I think MK kills it. She rocks it out for a girl with such a petite frame.
posted by guest
Mar 19, 2009 3:28PM
ADR easily. She's strong, confident, and dramatic in her ensemble. That's a woman you'd remember if you saw her walk down the street in that. MK looks dwarfed in such a strong shoulder and uncertain as to whether or not she pulled off the outfit. It looks oddly plain on MK for such a strong piece.
posted by guest
Mar 19, 2009 11:38PM
MK gets my vote. ADR is kind of a...handsome...woman to start off with, so the height of the hem and those Balmain shoulders don't do her any favors. Plus MK styled her dress in a way that doesn't look straight up Balmain...I think she made the piece more her own than ADR did.
posted by guest
Mar 20, 2009 12:32AM
ADR, hands down. I feel like anyone who says MK is doing so because she's younger and prettier..
but I feel like this dress looks really bad on her. her neck is gone and she doesn't have the hips or the length of leg to balance out those amazing structural shoulders. It looks like she got it a size too big... the length on the sleeves and hemline is horrendous.
posted by guest
Mar 20, 2009 2:30PM
MK O, she plays it well with the bangles and nude-ish colored sandal but the look looks too overaged for her. ADR looks like she overplayed it, she looks quite scary with the outfit she put together.
I agree, this outfit needs a long neck- and a late 20s to early 30s somebody.
posted by guest
Mar 22, 2009 5:57PM
this was ALREADY MADE AND POSTED at intheolsenscloset
http://intheolsenscloset.blogspot.com/2009/02/who-wore-it-better-anna-or-mary-kate.html
the original maker of the image. credit










posted by olyaiscool
Mar 19, 2009 11:21AM
anna della russo by a long shot. i adore mk and everything she wears and i think the dress looks great on her, but anna looks stronger in it. and i think anna had a better choice of shoes...