Explain

Explain: Why Are Jeans So Long?

paige premium denim  jeans are seriously the best.jpgAbout one minute into my trip to the new Paige Denim store in the West Village yesterday, I was a little miffed. Not because some guy muttered something about “artfully destroyed jeans” to me as I walked in, but because I went there specifically for the Petites Line, which takes up about 1/16 of the store.

Which brings me to my greater question: Why exactly are jeans so incredibly long? My “petite” jeans I bought yesterday came with a tag that reads, “This collection offers perfect proportions for the petite. Rather than simply cropping the length, this garment has been rescaled and tailored to accomodate [sic] the woman who is 5’4” and under.” Which is interesting, seeing as how the average height for the female American woman is 5’4” (and that statistic doesn’t take into account all the still-growing teenage girls who probably buy more jeans than all the rest of us combined).

It’s not that I’m naive about these things. I stare at and mull over fashion for a living, so I am fully aware that most designs are intended for people that don’t even exist. But you’d think that such an ordinary item wouldn’t be subject to the idea that everybody’s 5’10 and 85 pounds (and I won’t even bother to present the argument that making people-size jeans would help the cost since less fabric should equal less money - my petites are always the same price as their foot-longer counterparts).

So does anyone have the missing piece of information to this mystery? Because it would really help my weekend.

Comments

avatar
1

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 2:23PM

I think everyone could complain about badly fitting jeans and generalising about people's figures. My particular grumble is !why does everyone except H&H think everyone with an arse has thighs like an Olympic cyclist?!"

avatar
2

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 2:25PM

my only explanation would be that it's much easier to hem pants that are too long than it is to lengthen pants that are too short.

3

posted by Natalie Hormilla

Mar 13, 2009 2:31PM

ah yes, guest #2, that's what i used to think, too. but why wouldn't you just offer them in a variety of lengths, much like men's pants? plus, when you hem the jeans (which i have literally had to do my entire life until i started buying from the petites line of paige), you completely lose the proportion, so it's really not the same, especially since that's one of the considerations when buying expensive denim.

avatar
4

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 2:33PM

I've always heard that it's because they expect that jeans will shrink when they're washed... though mine never do. (I'm 5'2" myself, so I understand your annoyance).

Guest #1: I completely agree about the thigh problem!

avatar
5

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 2:38PM

I often find them to not be long enough. I'm 5'9", and most jeans after a washing are only good to wear with flats. I agree women's jeans should come in lengths like men's jeans.

avatar
6

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 2:40PM

I have to hem my petite jeans! How ridiculous is that!!?!?!

avatar
7

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 2:43PM

The reality is that one major cost in constructing a pair of jeans is the upper half, the pockets, the zipper etc... The cost of fabric to leave a jean longer is marginal.
If you want a variety of fits and lengths you should check out Levi's, they have many fits/finishes/lengths that fit many bodies.
I will say that reviews of stores and collections on this site seem to lean towards the negative, is there a reason for that?
I can't imagine everything is so aweful out there

avatar
8

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 2:48PM

I dont get it either, men have it so much easier, I HAVE YET to find the perfect pair of jeans, I'm 5 feet tall, with the thighs of a cyclist, and a small waist. I had to forget about designer jeans, I'm a 26 waist but I need a 28 or 29 just for the room for my thighs, and they are WAY to long, who are designers designing for? Giraffes??!

avatar
9

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 2:58PM

I believe the average fit model is 5'6" and of perfect proportion. For petites they alter off of those proportions.
Of course every company has their own market so each fit model is different.

avatar
10

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 3:01PM

I'm in commenter 5's boat. All of my jeans flood. It seems like if you're maybe about 5'6" and a size 4 or 6 then all jeans are made for you, otherwise, you're just going to have to suffer.

avatar
11

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 3:03PM

Its not that easy for men either. I'm 6'3, thin, with very long legs so finding jeans that fit is a lengthy battle (ha pun). Either my jeans are long enough and too wide or trim but too short. Usually only the very expensive designer labels make jeans that truly fit me because they are used to model body types. I think tall people of either sex have a much tougher time with jeans unless they are spending $400 on them!

avatar
12

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 3:18PM

A lot of places also make pants with the assumption that they are going to be worn with heels, so the standard inseam is 34" instead of, say, 32".

avatar
13

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 3:21PM

Completely agree with all. That said, Natalie, can you do a post on tips for hemming jeans?

I have two pairs that I've been holding onto (and tucking into boots) b/c I'm afraid of the tailor messing up the cuffs.

What are your tips for making hemmed jeans look like their original version?

avatar
14

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 3:37PM

You can't make jeans longer, only shorter.

Petite women should consider themselves lucky to be able to have pants tailored to fit.

Those of us that are taller often have a tough time finding jeans (or any pants for that matter) that we can wear with heels. And you can't bring your short jeans to a tailor and ask him to add 2 inches.

For me, a 34" inseam only works with flats.

avatar
15

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 3:43PM

I'm 5'11" and it's rare for me to find jeans or pants that are long enough. I pretty much always wear heels except with jeans unless they're a 36" inseam; otherwise they look like floods. I agree that making them in a wide range of lengths would be ideal.

avatar
16

posted by Lauren

Mar 13, 2009 4:01PM

I agree that women's jeans need to be sized like men's. Topshop does this, thankfully. I'm 5'8" and my ideal inseam is a 31, which is really short for fairly tall girl. Their 32" is about the best I've seen.

avatar
17

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 4:01PM

Many tailors now will be able to remove the original hem and sew it back on. There are a few different techniques, so ask around, at a locatl boutique or bring them in to your tailor.

avatar
18

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 4:01PM

Many tailors now will be able to remove the original hem and sew it back on. There are a few different techniques, so ask around, at a locat boutique or bring them in to your tailor.

avatar
19

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 4:06PM

When I worked in retail, they told us that regular jeans are made to fit a height of 5'7.
Maybe they want to make jeans long enough that a taller person would accept them as ankle length and a shorter person would be able to hem them without altering the shape too much?

avatar
20

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 4:25PM

At 5'11" I am greatful for longer jeans. I have a very hard time finding pants that are long enough. As many have said, you can always hem them (and yes, there are good tailors who know how to do it so that the original hem is kept intact so that you don't lose any details or the leg shape), but you can't make them longer.

avatar
21

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 4:34PM

So we all essentially agree that women's jeans should be sized like men's are. I think companies will start to move in that direction (I hope!)

avatar
22

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 4:37PM

THANK YOU FOR THIS POST!!! I've been wondering the same damned thing FOREVER!
I think the manufacturers all live in la-la land and just choose to go for a standard size that they believe to be somewhere in between "short" and "tall." I myself am a bit under 5'6" and a size 6 and find most pants to be too long to wear with a flat shoe. So, guest 10, there goes your theory LOL.

23

posted by bluealvarez

Mar 13, 2009 4:45PM

Guest 2 - I have the opposite problem. To me it seems like all designers assume if you have a tiny waist you have tiny thighs and no ass - wrong again!

avatar
24

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 4:50PM

It's so frustrating. I'm 5'6 and proportional, but I sometimes have to buy "short" jeans. It just makes me feel bad for people like my 5'2 sister! Surprisingly my current favorite jeans are from Target. They fit perfectly, length and all.

avatar
25

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 5:29PM

We need a line of jeans for people who are apple-shaped, and a line for people who are pear-shaped. I'm apple shaped and have a big tummy, but small butt and small thighs. By the time I find jeans that fit my stomach, they are waaaaay too big in the butt and thighs, which makes me look like I have no butt.

avatar
26

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 5:31PM

I actually know the answer to this, for once. I think I read it in Vogue.

For companies who outsource production, suppliers require a certain minimum commitment via the amount of denim they buy vs the number of jeans to be made.

Therefore, companies try to pack in as much of the available denim in all the finished products to use it up. Hence, the extra lengths.

The petite lines actually COST the companies money, because they are not able to use up all the denim from the suppliers -- hence, the higher price vs. the amount of actual material.

avatar
27

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 6:29PM

I'm 5'10" and weigh 120 pounds and let me tell you that jeans are not made for me either. Even jeans that claim to be long are high waters. So short people are not the only one's with this issue.

28

posted by Pretty Young Thing

Mar 13, 2009 7:37PM

I'm 6'1" and have a 38" inseam- how's that for hard to find jeans? Almost every pair I own goes to my ankles, which is unfortunate since I prefer heels (better proportions), so I can only really wear heeled boots with jeans. A few brands (Rag & Bone, J Brand Bardots) have longer ones though... it takes a lot of searching. I really don't think buying jeans is easy for anyone.

avatar
29

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 7:44PM

Agreed. But I do think it's something that's being addressed in other contemporary lines. I just read about a few designers who are cutting for 5'4 and under but trying to escape the whole "petites" label. Fernanda Carneiro is one I remember...

avatar
30

posted by ddelux

Mar 13, 2009 8:10PM

I would think a major reason for the length is because denim brands want actual tall, thin women wearing their jeans on the street. This further promotes the ideal image of the kind of woman who they think should wear their brand.

There are many stores that offer different sizing, such as Gap and Old Navy, that offer a "regular" and "ankle" versions. One step further is New York & Co., which offers a "tall," "ankle" AND "short."

avatar
31

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 8:33PM

Blame the fit model.

I was watching clips from Style.com and one buyer joked about her Marc jeans being long because he used Jamie Bochert (who is 5'10") as his fit model.

avatar
32

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 10:38PM

6'1", essentially have no waist, and ive never really had a problem. i mean, no more difficult than finding a flattering dress at worst

avatar
33

posted by guest

Mar 13, 2009 11:58PM

I have been wondering this for years myself.. let me know if you ever figure it out!

avatar
34

posted by guest

Mar 14, 2009 12:09AM

its easier to trim fabric then to add it! trust me before this was a norm, my 5'10 bod had a terrrrrrrible time finding jeans that were long enough.

http://www.nolabelleinthecity.blogspot.com/

avatar
35

posted by guest

Mar 14, 2009 1:32AM

i'm 5', about 100 lbs, and every pair of jeans needs to be hemmed. the last true religions i bought at saks i never wear because they had me try on jimmy choos to wear while they measured, and i kept telling them that i rarely wear heels higher than 4" (although I should), and now the jeans are still too long, after $300+ later... ugh. what a pain, really. I love being tiny, but if I were 5'4", I really think I could at least wear normal clothes that only require minimum hemming.

I love the double 0's that are about 12" too long on me. (American Eagle is a great example of that). Who is a double 0 that is taller than me? if they are, they definitely need to get a burger or something, for sure.

also, i've had a few drinks and feel like rambling, but dress pants are probably the worst for me. I like the idea of going to a waist v. inseam, like men's pants, much more practical.

xo

avatar
36

posted by guest

Mar 14, 2009 2:52AM

I'm pretty sure if you have a big tummy and no thighs and no butt you should consider spending your money on a trainer and not on expensive jeans...

avatar
37

posted by guest

Mar 14, 2009 4:08AM

ohhh snap! (to the last comment)

avatar
38

posted by guest

Mar 14, 2009 7:44AM

I'm 5'0" and only wear Topshop petite jeans because their length is perfect for me!

39

posted by ohmychuck

Mar 14, 2009 10:27AM

yeah i bought $187 Hudson jeans and i had to hem off like 4 inches. the store should offer complimentary resizing.

avatar
40

posted by guest

Mar 14, 2009 10:44AM

So I'm 5 ft 7 in and I'm pretty sure that doesn't make me petite in fact it makes me tall compared to the average women of 5' 4" and inorder to wear jeans with a flat or a lower heel I have to buy petite jeans. It's truly ridiculous! But if there's anyone out there who wants a pair of shorter jeans. 7 for all mankind makes a pair of flipflop jeans perfect for flats. Joes and Citizens also make good petite jeans.

avatar
41

posted by beccaeve

Mar 14, 2009 8:13PM

I'm only 5'7" but I still can't find jeans long enough. You can hem jeans if they're too long. You can't make them longer if they're too short.

avatar
42

posted by guest

Mar 14, 2009 8:42PM

I am about 5'7 as well and would have to wear petite jeans if i want to wear them with flats. i agree with #12 that it seems all manufacturers assume you're going to be wearing heels and actually want most your foot unseen. It's ridiculous. But I see longer inseams all the time online or in catalogs especially

avatar
43

posted by guest

Mar 14, 2009 10:45PM

I am 5'8 and I have flat jeans with a 32" inseam and heel jeans with a 35 1/2" inseam. I dont need to spend 100's on my denim. There are plenty of brands out there that do size their denim like menswear, you just need to step out of your expensive box to find them.
Levi's and The Buckle are two brands that I swear by. I have the same pair of jeans in three different lengths from the Buckle. I always get compliments on them whenever I wear them and they only cost me $70!!

44

posted by nicolemarie4

Mar 14, 2009 11:39PM

I have the same problem!!!!! I hate going jean shopping because jeans are too long and too tight!!!!! I don't want too spend 100's on jeans, I just want a pair that fit well!!!

avatar
45

posted by guest

Mar 15, 2009 1:11AM

As I do completely understand your problem with not being able to find denim that comes perfectly fit without alterations, I as well have had this problem in the past, but on the other end. I am not saying I am some 5'10" supermodel (not by any means), but i have always, until recently, struggled with being able to find jeans that were even long enough to wear with flats. I think every women, no matter what height or size, has difficulties finding that"perfect" pair of denim. It probably will never be an easy task and all of us will keep trying on hundreds before we find one pair that fits decently.

avatar
46

posted by guest

Mar 15, 2009 10:24AM

I work in a store that sells premium denim and the main reason is the fact that these jeans aren't mass produced. They are made in limited qualities so they need to be able to fit ideally anyone. Like someone said already you can't make jeans longer, but you can make them shorter. By having jeans long, they are able to be worn on people of various heights, where if they did make them in different lengths they would have to make twice as many pairs and worry about selling twice as many. Not to mention it would suck for people who really want to buy a certain pair of jeans but they can't because the only pair they have in their size is two inches to short. If they are too long they expect you to get them tailored to the length thats perfect for you.

avatar
47

posted by guest

Mar 15, 2009 10:43AM

Sorry Natalie but I can't sympathise after spending my junior high years looking I like I was waiting for a flood...I beyond love the fact that jeans are made longer these days. Cause belive me it flooding -so not cute!!!!

avatar
48

posted by guest

Mar 15, 2009 11:01AM

usually anytime i want to find a perfect basic, like jeans or white t-shirt, i'll spend a lot of time going to all the stores and trying on the same thing to see what fits best. it's hard with jeans b/c there are so many brands out there. which is why i've spent 6 months looking for the exact pair of super-skinny superfines i got in london a year ago and nobody carries them. one day i'm in urban outfitters and i swear their bcg cigarettes look pretty similar on. plus they're not as long and cost $54!!! and here i was searching madly to spend $300.

avatar
49

posted by guest

Mar 15, 2009 11:55AM

FINALLY
I am so glad some one said this so I wouldn't have to. You would think that if a petite jean is smaller and uses less fabric it would cost less. Plus sized clothing uses more material and costs more, correct?
Not the case, the retailer usually assumes that if they have to buy a petite and carry it along side the regular sizes that it should cost the same if not more because all of the sudden' petite' is i dunno a specialty item. WRONG. Complete opposite, I would consider it to be a standard in womens clothing because most women are in the 5'3-5'7 height range. Retailers need to step up there game, especially in NYC because we shop. We seriously shop, we don't just walk into a place and drop our money down and say 'Give it to me'. We scope things out online or a walk through before we consider any purchase. So to the retailers get real about your marketing, and to the people who are suckered into the sales persons pitch, you need a hard as nails stylist. They don't take crap from anyone, not even the savviest sales people at Barnes can detour the most studious of stylistas.

XOXO D

PS-Not every man has a raging six pack and perfect 12' chest waist ratio. But thats a different rant to come.

avatar
50

posted by guest

Mar 15, 2009 2:19PM

I didn't feel like reading the other comments, so I will saw what I have heard:

A sales guy at Saks told me jeans are made so long because Asian manufacturers require a minimum order for the best prices. A lot of the "fashion denim companies" (his words) didn't sell enough pairs to get a variety of lengths and still command a certain price. Hence they only ordered a single length and eventually it became industry practice.

avatar
51

posted by guest

Mar 15, 2009 7:15PM

Thank you!!! Every time I buy a pair of pants now, I have to hem them. I'm 5'6" so, too tall for petites, but apparently much too short for "average." It irritates me when I see all the options in sizes and inseams that men have.

avatar
52

posted by guest

Mar 15, 2009 7:55PM

I have the opposite problem -- jeans are the only pants long enough for me! I have the hardest time trying to find work pants that I can wear with heels. Oh, and I'm 5'8, so it's not like I'm absurdly tall.

avatar
53

posted by guest

Mar 15, 2009 9:21PM

That so strange when I was reading that post I didn't understood actually I have a hard time finding jeans because they are all not long enough. And I'm not super tall I'm 5"9 and I have to said that work pants are absurdly hard to find that why I wear skirt and dress to work. But seriously wear you shop for jeans because I check a lot of stores and they or pretty short just at Tommy Hilfinger, calvin klein I looked like a took my little sister pants and a won't even talk about the stores like H and M it make me mad.

avatar
54

posted by guest

Mar 16, 2009 12:23AM

Excuse you!

As a 6 foot tall woman, who is not 120 lbs, but a normal size 6, I find this post extremely offensive. I rarely find jeans my size- Manufacturers only assume that because I am so tall, I must have model proportions and not have a butt at all. There are petite sections to countless stores everywhere- Have you ever seen a "tall section" in clothing stores? Sometimes yes, but rarely no.

Please stop complaining, when you have a world of options available to you.

avatar
55

posted by guest

Mar 16, 2009 6:16AM

I am lucky. I live in Hong Kong. The retailers sell their jeans with free alteration. Customers can have their jeans narrowed by 1-2 in. at the waist and shortened as much as you like for the length. Too much shortening upset the proportion, though.

avatar
56

posted by guest

Mar 16, 2009 12:44PM

i agree with everything in this post...buying jeans is just an excruciating task when you're not a tall, thin barbie.

avatar
57

posted by guest

Mar 16, 2009 10:08PM

Chill out, #54. All Natalie's saying is that jeans aren't made to fit an average-height woman and that this doesn't make sense as jean-buyers probably tend to be about this height. It IS weird that average-size people have to buy specialty-size jeans. Nobody's denying that it's probably hard for you, over on the other end of the height spectrum, to find jeans too. However, you lucky super-tall girls make up a pretty small part of the population, so it would make more sense economically that manufacturers wouldn't cater as much to your needs.

avatar
58

posted by guest

Mar 17, 2009 12:10AM

This post was a complete waste of space, as are the majority of comments implying jeans should be cut for dwarfs. Why complain about getting alterations on jeans? (especially since it is typically free) The average woman is closer to 5'6" and the average pant inseam is 34.5". Women tall or short have different length legs. It just makes sense to have extra denim oppose to not enough. Maybe next I will post a story about shoes not having long enough laces. But then again who wears shoes with laces..?

avatar
59

posted by guest

Mar 17, 2009 2:12AM

to #58: the average height in US is just under 5' 4" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_height#Average_height_around_the_world)

also, for myself personally, most things over $200 I buy (like jeans or more expensive things like jackets or dresses), I do expect to take to my tailor to tweak slightly. I used to think that if I spend enough money I shouldn't have to fix it to fit me better because shouldn't it damn well fit already? Then I realized if I spend that much money, what's another $10-$50 to make the clothing feel like a custom fit? I realize I am not exactly a fit model body (only 5'5" with legs on the shorter side) so its worth the little extra cost.

avatar
60

posted by guest

Mar 17, 2009 7:09AM

God these comments are annoying, unless YOU are the fit model, your proberly not going to find a pair of jeans that fit you or everyone perfectly. Unless they are magic jeans, or you are in the film the sister hood of the traveling pants.

avatar
61

posted by guest

Mar 18, 2009 10:36AM

if you're 5'4 and want to have a perfect pair of jeans which means don't need to hem, then may i kindly suggest you to buy cropped denim like Siwy Hannah.

btw, Kate Moss and Sasha Pivovarova are both 5'4 and they swear by Siwy Hannah too.

oh, Kate Bosworth is only 5'2 and i think her fav jeans are by Topshop Petite.

anyway if you don't like above brand, you can always fall back on cropped jeans.

62

posted by sparksflyy

Mar 18, 2009 2:34PM

kate moss is 5'4? that i dont believe!


avatar
63

posted by guest

Mar 19, 2009 1:31PM

too long?
you must be kidding.
as a 16 yr old 6'2 jean shopper, i find it nearly impossible to find jeans that cover my ankles.

avatar
64

posted by guest

Apr 03, 2009 7:11PM

First of all, tall people, stop whining. Clothes are designed for your bodies, because tall is the ideal. If, like me, you are five feet tall, weigh 100 lbs, have a 22' waist and 37' hips (let's not even get into the 32C bras that are almost impossible to find), nothing is made for you. Clothes will never fit you right, even petites, unless you sew them yourself. Shoulders are wide, sleevers too long, dresses that are too snug at the hip and BAGGY at the waist, forget about bathing suits, and pants that fit your ass are huge on your thighs and legs. Stop complaining about pant length. Clothes are made with you in mind because you're better than short people.

avatar
65

posted by guest

Apr 04, 2009 1:51AM

ugh guest #64 quit it. I'm 5'10" and its quite hard finding jeans that doesn't make me look like i shopped in the kids section.

It's all about finding brands that are diverse. I've basically stuck with Lucky Brand Jeans. They have different inseams (30, 32, 34 and even 36 inch inseams). The jeans are pretty good and while it still is kinda expensive they have two big sales a year where I get two jeans for $100

you want great jeans you gotta do the research. I work with denim so I know

avatar
66

posted by karenx

Apr 05, 2009 4:39AM

I wish stores offered professional hemming servies :( I don't know if they do in America, but they don't usually in Sydney

avatar
67

posted by guest

Apr 06, 2009 8:10AM

#62: yes, Kate Moss is 5'4.
see here: http://www.celebheights.com/s/Kate-Moss-1495.html

avatar
68

posted by guest

Apr 06, 2009 2:30PM

I for one am very happy they are making jeans longer. I am 6'2 and 155 lbs which is on the lower end of average for my height. I am, however, not very happy about how the idea behind people of height are somehow overweight as well. I have a pair of 41" long jeans from Lucky and they are a 34" waist. I have a 30" waist. Am I supposed to gain twenty pounds to fit into them? Or am I doomed to forever have to choose between a waist that fits, and pants that are long enough?

So, in summary, mass production fashion designers are completely clueless. Either that or they want as all to have tailoring backgrounds so we can do proper construction for them.

avatar
69

posted by guest

Apr 07, 2009 1:54PM

"First of all, tall people, stop whining. Clothes are designed for your bodies, because tall is the ideal. "

But they are not manufactured for our bodies. Trust me. I'm 6'1" so nothing (darts, waist, pants length, shoulders, etc.) is in the right place for me. Being less-than-rich, I sew.

As for jeans, I swear by Wrangler men's Pro-Rodeo-- they make your ass look great and come in all lengths.

avatar
70

posted by guest

Apr 08, 2009 12:49PM

5'10 (size 4)and have been tall & skinny for my entire life. I used to have to suffer with high-waters year round. Then I discovered designer jeans and realized that there was a whole culture for tall people!

Your tailor should be your best friend not matter what your height/ size.

avatar
71

posted by guest

Apr 08, 2009 3:35PM

There aren't enough jeans for tall people!! As someone who is 5'10", the jeans STILL aren't long enough. They should make 37 inch inseams for us and petite inseams for you. But you're definitely mistaken in thinking jeans are made for my height...they're not!

avatar
72

posted by guest

Apr 08, 2009 8:08PM

Everyone's body is different, no matter your height. You can have two women 5'2 or 6', same weight, but their legs will be of different lengths for instance, or their hips wider, buttocks fuller or not...things that may draw extra fabric up, making pant legs shorter once on the body, for example. Bottom line is that our bodies are as different as fingerprints sometimes(exaggerating-but you get the idea). Better to have more fabric than not enough. #70: I agree with you 100%...everyone benefits from having a tailor not just for jeans but for everything you wear. As for men having it easier, I beg to differ. Many of their slacks are purposely NOT hemmed and extremely long. Men face a lot of the same issues, like where their pant hem/cuff hits their shoe heel and where it "breaks" on the top of their shoe. They also deal with buying bigger size pants to accomodate their athletic thighs and have to get the waist and crotch taken in. Happens ALL the time! So, they TOO have issues. Just accept yourself and make the clothes fit YOU, not the other way around :)

avatar
73

posted by guest

Apr 09, 2009 1:48PM

I love Mavi. They come in 30,32 and 34 no matter what the waist size. I hate when companies assume short people can't be a larger size and tall people a smaller size.

avatar
74

posted by guest

Apr 10, 2009 9:47PM

kate moss is not 5'4" , c'mon people....get it together!

avatar
75

posted by guest

Apr 14, 2009 9:52AM

I'd just like to point out that there are some of us on the other end of the spectrum. I AM one of those people who are 5' 10" (5' 11" actually) and weigh 110 lbs. (that's an exageration but I am on the slim side, and am built like a prepubescent boy) and it is IMPOSSIBLE to find jeans that are long enough, considering I need a 37" inseam for it to touch the ground. I know, I shouldn't complain, but all of you short people can always hem jeans at a tailors. it's kind of hard to make short jeans grow longer.

avatar
76

posted by guest

Apr 14, 2009 4:17PM

I feel your pain, at 5'1 it is almost a prerequisite to get my jeans tailored, and despite how much I love jeans its kind of become a chore, a much hated one at that. When I worked at G-star, they on the other hand provided length 28 jeans, so I didn't get them cut at all! For a steep price tag though, I guess its worth it because I've not bought anything since. Highly recommend G-star for those vertically challenged folk.

77

posted by Signature9

Apr 15, 2009 3:39PM

With so many people left out at both ends of the spectrum, I wonder how big the middle of the market really is.

On the tall end of things, there's a line launching this fall that will have inseams *starting* at 34". Pretty good considering the "tall" sizes in stores usually stop around 33" or 34". For the moment, TallGirl occasionally has styles that don't look like mom jeans. In the UK, there's Long Tall Sally, but 34" and 36" are usually the longest you can find.

http://www.signature9.com

avatar
78

posted by guest

Apr 15, 2009 11:04PM

I love Alloy for tall jeans--yeah, they're for teenagers, but I go for the black skinnies which are nice and flattering.

avatar
79

posted by guest

Apr 16, 2009 5:47PM

i can't ever seem to find jeans that are long enough. you can make jeans shorter but you can't make them longer. have you ever heard of getting jeans tailored? take advantage of being cute and petite, not tall and gangly.

avatar
80

posted by guest

Apr 20, 2009 1:22PM

I am just under 5'7 and had to buy AX short jeans this weekend. And I can still wear heels with them.

avatar
81

posted by guest

Apr 22, 2009 7:21PM

I am 5´7 and jeans almost always work out!!! :) but I do wonder sometimes how shorter or taller women deal with that. European brands like zara, are way too long even for me, I think those are meant for girls that are like at least 5´9. In the other hand I have a butt and I always struggle with that, I end up buying jeans that are a bit big on my waist just so they fit my butt :( everybody body is so different!

avatar
82

posted by guest

Apr 23, 2009 2:59AM

Hi! I work for a company who makes denim jeans for international brands (and no i am not from China!!), the reason why is because it's easier for production people to do just one length of pants instead of so many. anyways, those who are always looking for longer length of jeans , try looking at SASS&BIDE. They come in different lengths (XL, XXL, XXXL which stands for XTRA LONG).

avatar
83

posted by guest

Apr 23, 2009 6:51PM

Laughing out loud at all the nasty back-and-forth over short versus tall people... personally, I'm 5'7", not so very tall I suppose but in the area I live (in the Southwest U.S.) nobody seems to carry jeans for anyone over 5'4". One wash and they're high-waters, or "flip flops only" or sometimes even have to turn into cut-off "housecleaning days" shorts. I love Lucky and Paige denim (NON petite ;) ), they are actually long enough. T-shirts never cover my waistline... I don't want to look like a Britney wannabe every time I do laundry!

AND, I will have to share the first commentator's complaint, I have a small size 25/26 waist BUT a large rear, so nearly every pair of pants I find is saggy in the thighs and loose in the waist OR cannot fit over my butt. However, ya can't fit everyone perfectly... that's what we get for living in a society where we insist upon skin-tight clothing. ;)

avatar
84

posted by guest

Apr 24, 2009 7:01AM

I would recommend Topshop jeans, they're cheaper than designer and you can get them in leg lengths 29, 30, 32, 34, 36 I believe. definitly the best range on the high street.

avatar
85

posted by guest

Apr 26, 2009 3:42PM

The gangly tall gals should go to the Big and Tall store. Most of use cute women are between 5'2" and 5'6". cute!

avatar
86

posted by guest

Apr 28, 2009 11:51AM

post#74: truth is hard to swallow but Kate is indeed 5'4. c'mon all models lie about their heights.

avatar
87

posted by guest

Apr 30, 2009 12:44PM

This is so frustratingly hard to read I had to stop. WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND for you people? Jeans are long because you are supposed to hem them to fit. Hemming is not that big a deal, guys. Christ.

avatar
88

posted by guest

Apr 30, 2009 2:28PM

but guest 87, did you miss the comments about how hemming jeans makes them totally lose their proportion? also, certain styles, like bell bottoms (if you really want to wear those) aren't hem-able at all specifically because they were designed to remain their length. plus, is it really fair to have to have extra time and money built into the design of your jeans just because everyone else does it that way?

finally, it's really frustrating when people comment only to vent the attitude they don't have the guts to give people in real life. please refrain from commenting altogether unless you are honestly joining and furthering the conversation, not just asking a question that was answered over a month ago.

avatar
89

posted by guest

May 01, 2009 12:52PM

I'm 5'9" and its not only hard to find jeans that are long enough, but when you do you can hardly wear them with heals!! It's impossibl...

avatar
90

posted by guest

May 02, 2009 1:30PM

Truth be told, the jeans manufacturers have production minimums to meet and only larger companies cut jeans in mutliple lengths. So they pick an average length assuming the consumer will shorten their jeans.They tend to cut either 32" or 34 " on average and most brands tend to cut the longer length. However they fail to take into consideration that this only works with straight leg fits in which the knee and bottom opening are the same. At 5'1" and an owner of a jeans brand I know this all too well. I can nver buy a flair leg jean only to hem it and the fit is completely changed at 27" inseam Also true, most jeans designers fit on models with averge height of 5'8" in size 26 waist or 28 depending upon the brand and tend to not consider the average persons height( 5' 4" )to the industry standard. I will even go as far to say that some jeans designers only want " model types " to wear thier jeans.

avatar
91

posted by guest

May 05, 2009 11:44PM

uggh first of all how hard is it to get a pair of jeans hemmed?
designers of course are going to make a pair of jeans longer since solving the problem for short people is simple, hemming. if they were short inseams how is a tall person going to wear it?
second its called stacking, you stare and mull over fashion for a living and you never seen jeans stacked? guys do it moreso than ladies but i have seen girls with stacked jeans

avatar
92

posted by guest

May 16, 2009 3:31AM

Some of us have the opposite problem...

In case you're like me and looking for long jeans:

http://tinyurl.com/pq63xk

xxx

avatar
93

posted by guest

Jun 12, 2009 12:03AM

Ya know, I feel ya on the whole, "jeans too long thing" but for once, let us tall gals have SOMETHING our way!

For those of us who can't afford designer everything, we deal with uber short waistlines and sleeves that hit 3" above our wrists on a daily basis. Any idea how hard it is to buy a winter coat or blazer w/ long enough sleeves? Or something that fits correctly in the shoulders and bust but whose waistline doesn't fit around ones ribcage?

Oh and BTW - Big & Tall stores? Laughable! FIND me a decent one! At size 4, I'm not big enough to wear Lane Bryant and EVERY department store has a petite section with smaller proportioned versions of the same dresses available in the rest of the store. When do you ever see longer versions of things in department stores?

avatar
94

posted by guest

Jul 07, 2009 4:31AM

I'm 5/10 and a size 4 and I would like to know what stores you go to,because every time I go jean shopping all the jeans say long and xtra long and I have to let the hem out and they're still to short.I guess you could say I've been waiting for a flood all my life.

avatar
95

posted by guest

Jul 19, 2009 3:58AM

Perhaps they suppose the jeans looks better in a stiletto or some form of heel adding height to the woman and thus requiring more jean. If they are fashion jeans, this is most certainly the case. Would you really want a lot of women dressing them down with a Nike shoe rather than dressing them up in a Manolo Blanhik?

avatar
96

posted by mich

Sep 25, 2009 9:21AM

I used to rely on Gap for my jeans, and now I can't even seem to find a pair there. I'm a size 14, which obviously means I'm 6 ft. I'm almost 5'8, and the jeans are still hanging off my feet! I currently own 2 pairs of jeans I wear on a regular basis, and one of those are falling apart at the seams (literally) I've had them for so long. I understand the higher end boutiques catering to the tall and thin, but I would think that companies like Gap would be kinder to a wide variety of proportions.

avatar
97

posted by mich

Sep 25, 2009 9:33AM

One more thing, HOW are you tall people not finding jeans long enough??? I'm not short, but even the "regular" lengths hang off my feet! American Eagle, Gap, Banana Republic, try those out for long jeans. Of course, by the sound of a lot of these comments, some of you don't shop at commercial stores.

avatar
98

posted by guest

Oct 02, 2009 5:56PM

I think it is pretty clear that tall and short people have difficulty in finding clothes to fit. There really needs to be more dedication to tall and short people. Hemming jeans is a huge pain. I hate hemming. Why is it such a big deal for a manufacturer to just make different lengths to accomadate short and tall? I would certainly spend more money buying jeans if I didn't have to hem them but because I do I just stick to what I have for a long time. Short people shouldn't have to hem just because it is easier for the manufacturer who sells jeans for hundreds of dollars.

Post Your Comment