News

James Perse Puts His Foot Down

james perse supima long tank.jpgFact: When pieces are borrowed for a photo shoot, they are usually just that - borrowed, unpaid for, and are meant to be returned as soon as the shoot is over (unless someone on set has sticky fingers).

Fact: Many of these items, if returned, come back to their showrooms damaged.

Fact: So, designers are forced to consider the value of having their dress lent to a shoot for, say, ELLE against the loss of the garment itself (plus, just because something is shot doesn’t mean it’s actually going to make it into the pages of the magazine).

So James Perse is now making editors pre-pay for any borrowed items, minus a 10% discount, which they can only refund (minus the 20% restocking fee) once the items are sent safely back, no later than ten days after they’re borrowed.

WWD seems to think this is a bad idea (they posted this under the heading “Good Luck with That”). But here’s another fact: Back in the day when we used to assist on shoots, we saw many, many James Perse items shot on many starlets, later to be credited as part of the basics collection of designers that actually advertise.

So yeah. We don’t think James Perse is losing much on this one.

Comments

avatar
1

posted by guest

Apr 03, 2009 9:56AM

James Perse needs to do this to keep making money because his pieces are so nondescript. In an editorial shoot,a white James Perse v-neck can look the same as a white Hanes t-shirt.
For a t-shirt by, say, Chloe, it's pretty obvious it's Chloe and Chloe will get the credit...not always true for poor James Perse. :(

avatar
2

posted by guest

Apr 03, 2009 9:58AM

Funny because it is companies like these that helped create the culture of freebies and giveaways that we exist in today.

avatar
3

posted by guest

Apr 03, 2009 12:55PM

I totally get it. And Natalie...I saw the same thing. It's always about making the advertisers happy. Back in the day I worked with a high-end lingerie company that made us do the same thing for anything we "borrowed"...makes sense to me...

avatar
4

posted by guest

Apr 03, 2009 5:06PM

he should get credit, but it seems he'd make a lot more progress by giving them away FREE for credit trade. its the difference between using a punishment and using an incentive. what if he said: they are free, and you can keep them if you give credit. If you don't, we'll charge you full price for them to your credit card on file.

Post Your Comment