News

“But just as royalty now has less attention than celebrity, so couture has lost its unique prestige, with the word bandied about by any high-end designer. And whereas fragrances produced from the mystique of haute couture once kept the houses afloat, now it is just as likely that a hip jeans brand like Diesel or a celebrity like Jennifer Lopez will have the perfume hit that has stubbornly eluded Lacroix.” Suzy Menkes, on the devastating news that Christian Lacroix has filed for bankruptcy protection

Comments

avatar
1

posted by guest

May 28, 2009 5:00PM

devastating is right! this breaks my heart.

avatar
2

posted by guest

May 28, 2009 5:13PM

I cannot think of a sadder sign of the times...Anna, please do something!

3

posted by cesarcmma

May 28, 2009 5:21PM

Devasting is the word. :(

and it's hard to think on somebody doing something for the house, he lacked connection with the young costumers, which is (was) a shame because of his incredible craftmanship...one wonders what would have happened if he didn't part ways with LVMH...but they had "different creative visions"...

sad news...

4

posted by Jac

May 28, 2009 6:29PM

" 28, 2009 5:13PM

I cannot think of a sadder sign of the times...Anna, please do something!
"

really? you cant?

avatar
5

posted by guest

May 28, 2009 8:30PM

Cesarcmma, "he lacked connection with the young costumers," I didn't realize young customers are the ones funding a sustainable and meaningful fashion company or even capable of funding a sustainable and meaningful company. I'm guessing the majority of profitable fashion houses are funded not by young consumers and it is women that are purchasing their wears. Maybe part of the problem with fashion nowadays is its obsession with dressing girls and alienating women with the money and means to purchase and to purchase loyally and regularly.

avatar
6

posted by guest

May 28, 2009 10:03PM

I see the reason for it. It is all mediated by the current trends in the fashion industry, which designers thought was working in their favour, but it was the opposite. In the 80's and 90's fashion was a household subject, and people knew the names of models. But due to the selfish ambitions of fashion designers, wanting to make themselves out to be celebrities, prevented models from showing personalities and made them walk out in stoic expressions. Then came the skinny twig creatures from planet uba, who alienated alot of these brand's major customers.Do you really think that young skinny girls of the age of 16 can afford a $14,000 dress? No, its the middle aged business women who drive alot of sales in the fashion world, and like it or not, they are not of the species found on planet uba. They are chunky monkeys from planet jelly belly. When they see young girls, as opposed to models in their late/mid 20's, they feel confused about the brand's image, and go to banana republic to find some chinos.
So dont feel so sad people, the economy is one thing, but if you are a clever business person and not driven by your own subjective biased desires, you can survive a recession. Good brands stay strong in hard times if led by a strong business and marketing department, but if you base your marketing stratgies on your own opinions rather than what your market wants, then you deserve what you get.

And someone get those pink icing covered rasin buns off those girls heads, they will make their weaves dissolve!!!!!!!!

avatar
7

posted by guest

May 28, 2009 10:03PM

terrible news. few true couture designers are left.

re #5: connecting with young customers -> more hype and coverage in magazines like instyle (unfortunately) -> bigger bag/shoe/perfume/denim sales -> much greater profit than selling well designed beautiful clothes

also, it has been mentioned a lot that couture shows are very expensive and the designs are not profitable at all. the point of them is to get some celebrities to wear a couple of the dresses and then sell perfume and bags. it seems that lacroix hasn't been able to do that. and truthfully i have no idea what lacroix perfumes there are.

8

posted by Jean Voltaire

May 28, 2009 10:49PM

I am truly saddened by this news - it is devastating. His collections keep getting better and better and I honestly don't understand why his Maison is not appreciated. I will always have a spot for Lacroix - always.

9

posted by Malibu

May 28, 2009 10:55PM

Not ragging on the brand... I love Lacroix (I did a report on the label for my fashion industry class) but 6 is right! It's social darwinism and this is the time when only the most innovative and creative minds will survive in this business

avatar
10

posted by guest

May 29, 2009 2:14AM

You made my day, number six!

avatar
11

posted by guest

May 29, 2009 8:23AM

I know the name Lacroix (I know he makes haute-couture) but none of his clothes or his own face for that matthers comes to mind. I think that says enough.


@6 You clearly dont get it do you ? The reason why they use young skinny models is because the customers are not. There buying into a dream. They buy the clothes because they think they will look like that. What you dont have is always really appealing. These women with money have the means but they dont have the youth anymore. (Kind of tragic) Anyways there buying into the fantasy. Because aftert all, that is what Fashion is about: its a dream.

Its like you can buy a bra from Victoria's Secret. But 90% of the customers will never look like Doutzen.

www.dreamlovely-anne.blogspot.com

avatar
12

posted by guest

May 29, 2009 8:36AM

He's never turned a profit, so it's not exactly a shock. He just hasn't had the hit bags or perfumes that have sustained other houses. Sad.

avatar
13

posted by guest

May 29, 2009 9:03AM

This is why this is so sad:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=220407043131

avatar
14

posted by guest

May 29, 2009 9:06AM

@ 11: "Anyways there buying into the fantasy."? I believe it's 'Anyway, they're buying into the fantasy."
Your point loses its effectiveness with poor grammar. Sorry, had to call it out.

15

posted by darcykins

May 29, 2009 9:39AM

guest 14: 'Anyways' is just as correct as 'Anyway', although slightly more rustic. Neither are really appropriate in formal speech/writing but this is a blog comment board so I think guest 11 can write it and write it 'any way' they want.

avatar
16

posted by guest

May 29, 2009 10:20AM

@ 14 Yeah Im Dutch so English isnt my first language.

avatar
17

posted by guest

May 29, 2009 11:23AM

sad sad tyms

18

posted by Jean Voltaire

May 29, 2009 3:55PM

Loving Guest #17!

19

posted by austinsamuel

May 30, 2009 8:19AM

#11 "None of his clothes come to mind"

- Who wasn't wearing ombre tights for a while there?!?!?!

avatar
20

posted by guest

Jun 01, 2009 1:21AM

he has 3 perfumes with Avon..

Post Your Comment