“In contrast to Alex Shulman’s letter to the industry, I have very rarely experienced situations in which the samples are too small for the models (once or twice, mostly things with corsets) but have lost count of the number of times I have had to send a tailor to a celebrity’s house to take in a sample I have lent them…Sample sizes got tiny about the same time celebrity magazines started to multiply like those weird mushrooms that grow under the trees that dogs like. Up to that point there just were not that many ‘red carpet’ opportunities that it was worth schlepping samples around for…Whilst it is admirable that she [Shulman] has such strong feelings, it puts the fashion houses in a very difficult position as the value of celebrity coverage, particularly to beauty sales, is so high there is little they can do to back away from lending to x-ray thin celebrities.” Interesting excerpts and opinions on the sample size debate from an anonymous insider publicist on the LibertyLondonGirl blog
posted by guest
Jun 18, 2009 4:03PM
I thought she quit her blog months and months ago! I had no idea she returned. Love it. xo. http://isnotfashion.blogspot.com
posted by guest
Jun 19, 2009 6:49AM
Alexandra Shulman has been edinting Brit Vogue for over 15 years and she isn't stupid.. I'm sure she wasn't making baseless comments, unless of course (and this really is quite likely) her comments were twisted/taken out of context by the mainstream press, who are always keep to lampoon the fashion industry because it makes quite an easy target.
Shulman's letter was never intended for publication and it hasn't been reproduced in full anywhere, so who knows exactly what she really said?










posted by guest
Jun 18, 2009 2:55PM
I was just catching up on Fashionista, leaving a comment elsewhere. When the page refreshed, I saw you had excerpted from the thoughtful piece written for my blog by an anonymous publicist friend. Thank you! LLGxx