-
-
Staff
- Executive Editor
- Leah Chernikoff
- Features & Beauty Editor
- Cheryl Wischhover
- Fashion News Editor
- Hayley Phelan
- Associate Editor
- Dhani Mau
- Contributors
- Steff Yotka, Alice Pfeiffer, Ashley Jahncke, John Ortved, Chris Benz, Zandile Blay, John Jannuzzi, Sally Lyndley, Elana Fishman, Hayley Phelan, Sarah Ferguson, Mickie Meinhardt, Natalie Matthews, Misty White Sidell, Alaina Hernandez, Amanda Enowitz, Dana Kruspe, Modesta Dziautaite, Elysia Mann, Fawnia Soo Hoo, Nora Crotty, Jennifer Chan, Jihan Forbes, India-Jewel Jackson, Jo Piazza, Justine Harman
Recommendations
-
Most Read
- 1
Jason Wu for Target Fallout: 11,000 Items Currently on eBay and Two Re-Sellers Buy Out the Entire Collection in a Miami Target (We've Got Video) - 2
Watch: Anna Wintour Defends Her 'Bitchiness' on 60 Minutes - 3
Karl Lagerfeld Thinks Adele Is 'A Little Too Fat' and More Highlights from His Unfiltered Interview in the Metro - 4
BB Creams Are the Hottest New Product to Hit the Beauty Aisle--Here's What They Can Do For You - 5
See All of Madonna's Givenchy Super Bowl Halftime Looks
- 1
Topics
Agyness Deyn Alexa Chung Alexander McQueen Alexander Wang Anna Wintour Balenciaga Barneys Carine Roitfeld Chanel Chloe Coco Rocha ELLE Fall 09 Fashion Trivia Fashion Week Gap Gossip Girl Gucci H&M J. Crew Jeremy Kost Karl Lagerfeld Kate Middleton Kate Moss Lady Gaga Louis Vuitton Marc Jacobs Models Net-a-Porter Prada Proenza Schouler Project Runway Rachel Zoe sales Stella McCartney Style.com Target Teen Vogue Television TopShop Urban Outfitters Vivienne Westwood Vogue Vogue UK WWD-
Copyright © 2012 Breaking Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
Registration or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.




jesus christ, it’s a joke. on a fashion blog! y’all need to chill out
jesus christ, it’s a joke. on a fashion blog! y’all need to chill out
as i remarked on an adventures in copyright post, these girls must love pissing their readers off. or they are extremely dense. this might be a joke, but one they knew would anger alot of their readers. putting aside the whole checking the internet at work thing.
honestly, they writers really bring nothing to the site, they are easily replaceable. i come here just for the news. if the owners of this blog had any sense, they would get new writers before the current ones chase everyone off.
(i am asuming that the writers were hired by someone to write on this blog. if thats not the case, ignore the last paragraph.)
as i remarked on an adventures in copyright post, these girls must love pissing their readers off. or they are extremely dense. this might be a joke, but one they knew would anger alot of their readers. putting aside the whole checking the internet at work thing.
honestly, they writers really bring nothing to the site, they are easily replaceable. i come here just for the news. if the owners of this blog had any sense, they would get new writers before the current ones chase everyone off.
(i am asuming that the writers were hired by someone to write on this blog. if thats not the case, ignore the last paragraph.)
as i remarked on an adventures in copyright post, these girls must love pissing their readers off. or they are extremely dense. this might be a joke, but one they knew would anger alot of their readers. putting aside the whole checking the internet at work thing.
honestly, they writers really bring nothing to the site, they are easily replaceable. i come here just for the news. if the owners of this blog had any sense, they would get new writers before the current ones chase everyone off.
(i am asuming that the writers were hired by someone to write on this blog. if thats not the case, ignore the last paragraph.)
as i remarked on an adventures in copyright post, these girls must love pissing their readers off. or they are extremely dense. this might be a joke, but one they knew would anger alot of their readers. putting aside the whole checking the internet at work thing.
honestly, they writers really bring nothing to the site, they are easily replaceable. i come here just for the news. if the owners of this blog had any sense, they would get new writers before the current ones chase everyone off.
(i am asuming that the writers were hired by someone to write on this blog. if thats not the case, ignore the last paragraph.)
#15: if i wanted jokes i would read a comedy bog. and if this was a joke, it sure as hell wasn’t funny or even slightly cute.
#15: if i wanted jokes i would read a comedy bog. and if this was a joke, it sure as hell wasn’t funny or even slightly cute.
#15: if i wanted jokes i would read a comedy bog. and if this was a joke, it sure as hell wasn’t funny or even slightly cute.
#15: if i wanted jokes i would read a comedy bog. and if this was a joke, it sure as hell wasn’t funny or even slightly cute.
#10, according to the log, you are already taking your break at 9:43 am?!
#10, according to the log, you are already taking your break at 9:43 am?!
#10, according to the log, you are already taking your break at 9:43 am?!
#10, according to the log, you are already taking your break at 9:43 am?!
i love you girls but this was probably uncalled for. i think it’s funny, but i can see why some ppl are getting pissed.
and RR i wouldn’t jump to a conclusion that all of us are in the same time zone here
i love you girls but this was probably uncalled for. i think it’s funny, but i can see why some ppl are getting pissed.
and RR i wouldn’t jump to a conclusion that all of us are in the same time zone here
i love you girls but this was probably uncalled for. i think it’s funny, but i can see why some ppl are getting pissed.
and RR i wouldn’t jump to a conclusion that all of us are in the same time zone here
i love you girls but this was probably uncalled for. i think it’s funny, but i can see why some ppl are getting pissed.
and RR i wouldn’t jump to a conclusion that all of us are in the same time zone here
i love you girls but this was probably uncalled for. i think it’s funny, but i can see why some ppl are getting pissed.
and RR i wouldn’t jump to a conclusion that all of us are in the same time zone here
#18 – I don’t really feel the need to explain my work schedule to you, but yes, I take my break then. Some of us start work during the early hours of the morning.
#18 – I don’t really feel the need to explain my work schedule to you, but yes, I take my break then. Some of us start work during the early hours of the morning.
#18 – I don’t really feel the need to explain my work schedule to you, but yes, I take my break then. Some of us start work during the early hours of the morning.
#18 – I don’t really feel the need to explain my work schedule to you, but yes, I take my break then. Some of us start work during the early hours of the morning.
#18 – I don’t really feel the need to explain my work schedule to you, but yes, I take my break then. Some of us start work during the early hours of the morning.
i love how people assume everyone’s checking fashionista at work. maybe some of us are in the living room and we don’t want our younger siblings/family members to think we’re dirty pervs? or at a cafe and we don’t want people to start giving us weird stares because they think we’re looking at porn? just a thought.
i love how people assume everyone’s checking fashionista at work. maybe some of us are in the living room and we don’t want our younger siblings/family members to think we’re dirty pervs? or at a cafe and we don’t want people to start giving us weird stares because they think we’re looking at porn? just a thought.
i love how people assume everyone’s checking fashionista at work. maybe some of us are in the living room and we don’t want our younger siblings/family members to think we’re dirty pervs? or at a cafe and we don’t want people to start giving us weird stares because they think we’re looking at porn? just a thought.
i love how people assume everyone’s checking fashionista at work. maybe some of us are in the living room and we don’t want our younger siblings/family members to think we’re dirty pervs? or at a cafe and we don’t want people to start giving us weird stares because they think we’re looking at porn? just a thought.
i love how people assume everyone’s checking fashionista at work. maybe some of us are in the living room and we don’t want our younger siblings/family members to think we’re dirty pervs? or at a cafe and we don’t want people to start giving us weird stares because they think we’re looking at porn? just a thought.
something to ponder: if you can’t look at fashion editorials at work (depending on where you work, anyway) because it may make you look inappropriate due to its (sometimes) likeness to pornography (assuming you can look at all other types of non-work-related sites at some points during the work day) and you won’t look at it in front of family members or even total strangers in public, then is it fair to say that it sometimes is more porn than fashion? and what does that say about the ages of (many) models? i mean, i’m not sure i’d want someone to catch me looking at karlie kloss in a bra and stiletto’s either and yet i look at this stuff all the time (not to mention that i also support it by actually paying money for it and therefore ensuring its survival and place in the world). but maybe that’s just the banality of evil, as hannah arendt put it.
something to ponder: if you can’t look at fashion editorials at work (depending on where you work, anyway) because it may make you look inappropriate due to its (sometimes) likeness to pornography (assuming you can look at all other types of non-work-related sites at some points during the work day) and you won’t look at it in front of family members or even total strangers in public, then is it fair to say that it sometimes is more porn than fashion? and what does that say about the ages of (many) models? i mean, i’m not sure i’d want someone to catch me looking at karlie kloss in a bra and stiletto’s either and yet i look at this stuff all the time (not to mention that i also support it by actually paying money for it and therefore ensuring its survival and place in the world). but maybe that’s just the banality of evil, as hannah arendt put it.
something to ponder: if you can’t look at fashion editorials at work (depending on where you work, anyway) because it may make you look inappropriate due to its (sometimes) likeness to pornography (assuming you can look at all other types of non-work-related sites at some points during the work day) and you won’t look at it in front of family members or even total strangers in public, then is it fair to say that it sometimes is more porn than fashion? and what does that say about the ages of (many) models? i mean, i’m not sure i’d want someone to catch me looking at karlie kloss in a bra and stiletto’s either and yet i look at this stuff all the time (not to mention that i also support it by actually paying money for it and therefore ensuring its survival and place in the world). but maybe that’s just the banality of evil, as hannah arendt put it.
So what fashion is art you either get it or you don’t. Who cares if there is a bit of pornography. It’s all a part of the overall idea. Learn to live with it.
So what fashion is art you either get it or you don’t. Who cares if there is a bit of pornography. It’s all a part of the overall idea. Learn to live with it.
So what fashion is art you either get it or you don’t. Who cares if there is a bit of pornography. It’s all a part of the overall idea. Learn to live with it.
So what fashion is art you either get it or you don’t. Who cares if there is a bit of pornography. It’s all a part of the overall idea. Learn to live with it.
So what fashion is art you either get it or you don’t. Who cares if there is a bit of pornography. It’s all a part of the overall idea. Learn to live with it.