People Are Talking

About That New Rule…

because i like kate moss a lot.jpgOn Tuesday, I’m going to write a post about a store I swung by on the way to work this morning and in it, I’ll probably tell you that after I interviewed the owner he gave me a pair of sunglasses.

I don’t want it to detract from his brilliant shop and almost insane love and knowledge of glasses. I want you to know that I’d love it and write about even if I’d stumbled upon it on my own, but that there are millions of great stores in New York and sometimes it takes a PR pitch to find them. I don’t want to not tell you and create an uproar or end up owing the government $11,000.

The question is, now that the FTC demands I tell you what I’ve been gifted, I’m trying to figure out the most tactful, and least distracting, way of doing so (even though I’ve disclosed freebies in the past, it feels like an entirely new pressure now that the government demands I do so) and that’s where you come in.

What should our policy be? Should we tag the story “Free?” Does mentioning it in a post distract you from the content? Does it make our opinion less valid, or the story less relevant, when we announce that something was free? In this case, in which I’m not even suggesting you buy these glasses (because they’re actually not even for sale), but just sharing valuable information, do I need to tell you anything? What do you, as the reader, want to know?

Fashionista isn’t even a review heavy site, about a tenth of our stories are product oriented and only a small percentage of those discuss free product, but we’ll put an official policy in place before the rule kicks in December 1st. So tell us what you think that policy should be, and we’ll whip something up.

Comments

1

posted by Jean Voltaire

Oct 09, 2009 3:27PM

I expect a picture of each item. Now - go get your camera and show me those damn glasses.

avatar
2

posted by theeleven

Oct 09, 2009 3:30PM

i totally agree- just show us what you got for free and move on. it's totally the standard in this industry, so we all kind of expect that you're getting free stuff and don't trust the opinions any less.

avatar
3

posted by LK

Oct 09, 2009 4:14PM

I agree with everyone else. Tell us you were gifted something then move on.

avatar
4

posted by lauren

Oct 09, 2009 4:27PM

No complaints right? It's like REAL journalism.

avatar
5

posted by guest

Oct 09, 2009 4:40PM

what i wore - the blog does it flawlessly.

avatar
6

posted by nuhh429

Oct 09, 2009 4:54PM

Tell us, and move on. I think most people believe that you won't write about something just because you received it for free. Most readers will trust that you write about things you like and you like them regardless of things you have received.

avatar
7

posted by guest

Oct 09, 2009 5:42PM

maybe put it at the bottom - like "ps - This company gave me a pair of sexy hot sunglasses."

avatar
8

posted by guest

Oct 09, 2009 6:43PM

companies give things away for free all the time - that doesnt guarantee that they will be featured.

it's up to you to showcase it. kind of like an editorial shoot, if a designer/pr firm sends a magazine 10 dresses, it's up to the editors and stylists to say OMG, we love that, we have to use it. Or, Ew, WTF am I gonna do with a tacky fur jacket.

Just dont plug something stupid for the sake of pleasing a friend or publicist.

avatar
9

posted by kat

Oct 09, 2009 7:15PM

Yeah just mention you received something then,if it really is worth gushing over, do so. If it sucks or doesn't work like it's supposed to, tastefully tell us why, or just don't write about it at all.


avatar
10

posted by marsgaret

Oct 09, 2009 10:05PM

It's so interesting to me that so many bloggers are freaking about this. Why is it embarrassing to admit that you are getting free stuff? Because I think that's what at the root of this, not the awkwardness of working it into the review. That part's easy. You can always just be matter-of-fact ("Mr X, who gifted me with a pair of his fantastic sunglasses, says...") or you can mark all freebie-involved posts with a special tag. There are any number of non-intrusive things you can do. Or you could just not accept the sunglasses, there's always that.

avatar
11

posted by guest

Oct 10, 2009 3:28AM

funny, i work in radio (sort of. more sports marketing), as a marketing manager and we're starting to develop our policies on that, too, especially for endorsements. it might get a little awkward when we have to flat-out say that 'so and so dealership gave us a car' instead of just implying that we magically use all products. for endorsement deals, this definitely affects how people in the media will relay their information. not the same as this site (i think in fashion it is definitely different), but still an interesting conundrum right now.

avatar
12

posted by guest

Oct 10, 2009 11:26AM

I'd appreciate hearing about it upfront before you rave about something, not because I wouldn't then trust your review but just to know. So, like someone else said, you could just write "(blank), who gave us these awesome sunglasses..." etc. Not a big deal. We pretty much already assumed you were getting some freebies.

avatar
13

posted by Peanut1188

Oct 10, 2009 1:24PM

How about you just make a "freebie" tag, and label such posts accordingly?

avatar
14

posted by guest

Oct 10, 2009 2:27PM

I don't think a freebie tag is necessary, but a brief mention is. No big deal.

avatar
15

posted by guest

Oct 10, 2009 3:44PM

Why don't you just do a collage photo of all the free stuff and label the respective stores it came from. If this is done every week then you can maintain your old format while still adhearing to the law without distracting readers.

16

posted by shinyredthermos

Oct 11, 2009 1:19AM

Since I trust you guys to tell the truth about your opinions no matter what you are gifted, I like the idea of a tag and maybe a P.S.

And since I also really like pictures and everyone's a voyeur you should probably just post more pictures of your stuff anyway. ha.

It wont distract us. I think we can handle it. Just keep telling it like it is.

avatar
17

posted by erin

Oct 11, 2009 6:43PM

I love the collage idea. I trust that you guys will be raving about the things you love whether or not a freebie was part of the deal. To place a comment or ps on every article where you got something for free is too 'in your face'. We know you get free stuff but I prefer not to be reminded over and over again... once a week or something sounds fab.

18

posted by kkwild

Oct 12, 2009 1:33PM

I agree about the collage. You could do something similar to the posts where you thank your advertisers. That way, if you receive a freebie that is worth talking about, you can do a separate post where you won't have to mention at all that it was free.

avatar
19

posted by Lauren

Oct 12, 2009 3:02PM

Ugh, who told the government it has a say over the internet anyway?
But agreed: show us your swag, let us writhe in envy a little, and move on.

avatar
20

posted by guest

Oct 12, 2009 4:36PM

Being up front doesn't necessarily make your opinions less valid, but it does give us a better handle on evaluating them. The most tactful thing to do would be to just be clear and up front with it, and any attempt to sneak it in or gloss over it would be like a bald man with a combover, which just draws attention to the fact and makes it seem like you are being disingenuous. In any post about a vendor/product where you got something for free, mention it in the story itself, preferably at the beginning or end.

avatar
21

posted by Lalia

Oct 12, 2009 5:14PM

Accepting (gifts) from subject of reviews/articles biases you. You should not accept gifts. If you must, you should indicate that your work is an advertisement. This seems obvious to me, but perhaps bloggers don't want to be seen as real journalists.

avatar
22

posted by guest

Oct 16, 2009 2:33AM

From a legal perspective I don't think the mash-up would suffice. Nor do you have to take a picture of the thing. The law simply requires that you "clearly and conspicuously disclose" the information that it was given to you for free.

It seems to me that mentioning it in the text of the article may not be enough either (if for example the headline reads "Amazing Prada Shoes," someone might not read the entire article). Why not something simple - just put a disclaimer in small print underneath the author's name or at the end of the text? That way you don't have to work in the aside every time. Like, you could use the same style that the dates are written in in the comments section.

Something like: "The [Prada shoes] mentioned in this post were provided without cost to Fashionista."

Oh, and whoever gives you stuff is supposed to be on top of this too, so you aren't the only one who has to worry about it.

From,

Happy to be able to finally write something of use on this website.

PS - Yes, I am a lawyer, and no, this should not be construed as legal advice. If you want legal advice, go ahead and hire someone If you just want more information, there is information, including some short videos, on www.ftc.gov.

Post Your Comment