It’s clear from our Adventures in Copyright series (especially the Marc by Marc near exact replica we posted yesterday) that designers have little protection when it comes to their designs. For American designers to protect their patterns, they must attain “trade dress” protection, which means consumers recognize a knockoff as coming from a particular designer like say, a wrap dress from DVF. This is pretty hard to prove and designers rarely win these cases.
It’s a frustrating position for American designers to have little recourse when their designs are copied down to the most subtle details but a new bill gives designers some hope. Late last night, the New York Times broke the news that New York Senator Charles E. Schumer introduced a bill called the Innovative Design Protection and Piracy Prevention Act which would provide “very limited intellectual property protection to the most original design.” So if Marc Jacobs wanted to sue whomever knocked off his bag, he’d have to prove that that his design is a “unique, distinguishable, non-trivial and non-utilitarian variation over prior designs,” and that the knock off is “substantially identical” to the original.
According to the Times, the bill has the support of both sides of the industry: the CFDA representing the designers, and American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA) representing the manufacturers.
“This type of statute may help the most innovative designers protect against knockoffs,” says attorney Anne Sterba, who represented Valentino in the settlement of a 16-year trademark case.
But designers shouldn’t start dancing in the streets just yet, Sterba cautions. “We need to see how the bill looks in its final version and how the courts interpret it before we celebrate too much,” says Sterba. “This is a great first step for designers though. If this bill passes, the US will join a number of other countries that protect these types of items.”
Our fingers are crossed.



Jason Wu for Target Fallout: 11,000 Items Currently on eBay and Two Re-Sellers Buy Out the Entire Collection in a Miami Target (We've Got Video)
Watch: Anna Wintour Defends Her 'Bitchiness' on 60 Minutes
Karl Lagerfeld Thinks Adele Is 'A Little Too Fat' and More Highlights from His Unfiltered Interview in the Metro
See All of Madonna's Givenchy Super Bowl Halftime Looks
BB Creams Are the Hottest New Product to Hit the Beauty Aisle--Here's What They Can Do For You
Legally that sounds like a very very high bar for the designers to pass.
Legally, this will mean nothing. The language is so vague it will be virtually impossible to prove anything.
Considering the entire history of fashion, the need for a design to be “unique, distinguishable etc” is going to be hard to prove. Foreign jurisdictions (such as the PRC) are flooding international markets with copies of varying quality with total impunity so the effect of any legislation in the U.S. is not likely to be great.
I'm not an overpaid blowhard, but I've gotta ask this:Why fix it if it's not broken?Seriously.
I think that’s a wonderful idea! I hope Marc Jacobs can prove it, and wins!
In the photo for the story, who is the “High Fashion” designer of the bird purse? I have only seen the Marc by Marc Jacobs version.
p90x reviews
p90x workout schedule
p90x fitness
p90x insanity workout
p90x free online
dose p90x work
p90x exercise dvds