K-Stew’s Vogue Cover Leaks: We told you yesterday that Kristen Stewart was Vogue‘s February cover girl and now the good people at The Fashion Spot have scanned it in. She’s wearing Proenza Schouler and looks every bit as angsty and miz as we expected. Thoughts? {The Fashion Spot}

Miss Piggy, French Vogue Editrix: In Jason Segal’s (swoon) new Muppet Movie, set for release in February 2012, Miss Piggy will be an editor at French Vogue. Wait, I thought Emmanuelle Alt was the new editor? {Vogue UK}

Marc Jacobs 16 Fresh Faces to Watch: For Louis Vuitton’s spring jewelry collection campaign, Jacobs chose to feature 16 up-and-comers spanning the globe, from actresses to athletes to scenesters, instead of going with established models. The line up? Mary Charteris, aristrocrat and fashionista from London; Daria Schieferstein, tennis player; Nathalie Love, actress; Charlotte Lebon, French TV presenter and illustrator; Camille Rowe-Pourcheresse, actress and top model from Paris; Mahini Geisweiller, Parisian singer; Lina Esco, Actress; Billie Porter, reporter and party girl from London; Clara 3000, DJ from Paris; Rinko Kikuchi, actress from Tokyo; Alka Balbir, singer; Hailey Gates, actress. {Telegraph}

Model Designs: Irina Lazareanu launched her first full collection from her Japan-only clothing brand Irina L. {Racked}

No, No Nanette: Nanette Lepore maybe had a little too much vino on Stanley Tucci’s new PBS show “Vine Talk” (guests come on and do blind taste-tests of wines–unrelated, how can I get on this show?), and said that the velvet covering the wine bottles reminded her of “soft-core porn” from the ’70s and ’80s and that her next collection was inspired by films from that time. {Page Six}


Fashionista in your inbox

Subscribe to our free email newsletter and get the best fashion, style, and beauty news and tips.

Most Popular Stories

Comments [15]

Kristen does not look miz. I am not a fan but even I have to admit that she looks stunning

stunning? lol. just no.

but you gotta love KStew’s characteristic mash-up of constipation/confusion/fear.
if nothing else, the girl is consistent.

LMAO…..that is true. She is consistently never camera-ready. Even when she’s in front of the camera for hours-on-end for a shoot, she always looks like she just got caught unawares. Consistent? Yes. But that irks the shit out of me about her.

I don’t find that angst-y, apathetic, nervous/constipated look appealing.

Natalie Portman looks amazing in that (what I presume to be LV) cheongsam.

Mila Kunis looks crazy with those extra long feathers dripping from her eyeage.

The rest? No comment.

What is it about her that makes every stylist say, “Oh yeah, we totally need to do eighties hair!”?

What an awful Vogue cover. And awful choice for a cover. She is one of the worst actresses around.

worst actress around? oh dear if you just watch movies like twilight, then i am sorry for you.She is great actress. Have you ever seen the runaways or welcome to the rileys? No. Go see them and then come back to say she’s the worse. That cover is pretty, natural and refreshing for a Vogue US cover. I expected it to be ugly, but it’s surprisingly a good cover.

I’ve sadly watched her twitch, stutter and blink through Adventureland, The Runaways and The Cake Eaters to name a few. She is awful.

It true. He never consistent camera-ready. Although the front of the camera for hours to shoot, he always looks like he just killed the prisoners. Consistent? Yes. But it was disturbing shit out of me with him.

http://www.buddygag.com/blogs/416/164/men-s-work-boots-how-can-you-c

ugh. aside from how blah she looks i really just don’t care what she has to say.

this vogue’s cover is awful. I don’t think Kristen is the right choice for Vogue.

I don’t like Kristen for Vogue. Just…no way IN HELL. But Anna had her look pretty good for once! You have to admit it came out better than you thought it would.

I like that she doesn’t look quite ready, it captures some spontaneity and looks natural, if that’s the look Vogue was going for. It doesn’t look pose-y.