Carey Mulligan has changed red carpet fashion.

I say this on the day after the Golden Globes not because she wowed me last night–she wasn’t even there. It’s because ever since Mulligan wore that Prada dress to last year’s Oscars, the red carpet has gotten a bit more interesting.

Of course there were risk takers before she the pulled it off: Maggie Gyllenhaal, Kirsten Dunst, Michelle Williams, and Sofia Coppola have looked pulled together and cool over the past decade. But here’s why Carey’s different: She’s not cool. She’s pretty and smart and admirable, but she’s not particularly slick or hip. She’s made not wearing a nude, sparkly dress okay for non-hipsters. She’s even made it necessary.

Last night, there were more than ten dresses which I thought, even if they weren’t perfect, were good. And interesting. Usually, I’d say the number is more like three. Of course January Jones was a standout in Versace. Claire Danes and Emma Stone made the money Calvin Klein is spending on tv commercials seem a bit more sensible. And 14-year-old Hailee Steinfeld was stunning–without appearing childish or inappropriate–in a Prabal Gurung column gown and Ferragamo shoes. I can easily wax on: Julianna Margulies in vintage YSL couture (courtesy of Decades, natch). Heidi Klum in Marc Jacobs. Leighton Meester in Burberry. Robert Downey Jr. in Prada. Jennifer Lawrence in Louis Vuitton. They all looked, well, awesome.

I even admired Michelle Williams‘ 1960s-inspired Valentino dress, despite the fact that it came off as just a bit too referential.

Everyone might not agree with our choices for best dressed, but I have no doubt fashion lovers found something to appreciate last night. So thank you, Ms. Mulligan. (Or maybe we should thank Anna Wintour, who suggested she wear a tea-length dress to the Oscars in the first place.)


Fashionista in your inbox

Subscribe to our free email newsletter and get the best fashion, style, and beauty news and tips.

Comments [9]

you’re not brave enough to point out the best and the worst, January Jones in Versace and Michelle Williams‘ 1960s-inspired Valentino dress were chosen as worst in many website..

You’re right about the last bit, the comments on sites like Gawker roundly condemn the choices of Michelle, Tilda, Emma Stone and Claire Danes. Thing is, this website is run by people who are educated in fashion, and if you were present for the liveblog last night, you’d know their admiration of those looks is completely sincere.

Heidi Klum in Marc Jacobs was one of my favorite Heidi looks ever. She’s usually one for the overtly grand red carpet dress, and this playful gown was perfect for her. I wish that someone had worn one of the beautiful gowns from MJ Fall 2010, though, even though they’re a bit old now. Michelle Williams would’ve done better with this flower motif.
http://www3.images.coolspotters.com/photos/423311/marc-jacobs-fall-2010-gold-multi-daisy-lame-gown-with-sequin-detail-profile.jpg

* she the pulled it off

Hmmm….I think Heidi looked……odd in the MJ. Although, I have to say that it was INSTANTLY recognizable…which is a good thing in a sea of barely recognizable labels that evening.

I just appreciated it cause she’s the sort of lady who should be wearing that collection (which was far from my favorite MJ collection) and it looked carefree, as it should be because she’s just attending, and probably doesn’t stress out about attending these sorts of things anymore. That, and I used to loath the voluminous Galliano ballgowns she dragged around everywhere. This is a much more suitable look, I think.

Hmmm….you have a point. The Galliano gowns were beautiful, no doubt, and a true testament to his talent, but they always looked so fucking labored. Ugh.

Heidi’s look, I noticed, minus the hair, was straight off the runway. She DID look effortless, I’ll say, but something about it also read a bit….limp, I guess for lack of a better word, to me.

Hmmm….I think Heidi looked……odd in the MJ. Although, I have to say that it was INSTANTLY recognizable…which is a good thing in a sea of barely recognizable labels that evening.

Gawker may condemn the style of Danes, Jones, Swinton, and Stone all they want, but I’m of the Justice Potter Stewart line of thinking: “I may not know how to define style, but I know it when I see it!!!”

Leave a comment