News

American Apparel “Shake Down” Continues: Internet Smear Campaign Launches Against Dov Charney’s Accusers

Friday, Mar 25, 2011 / 8:29 PM

Photo: Getty

In the last month, five former American Apparel employees have come forward claiming sexual harassment against the company’s founder Dov Charney. 20-year-old Irene Morales filed suit in early March, seeking $260 million in damages. On Wednesday, the New York Times reported that a second sexual harassment suit was being brought against Charney on behalf of four former American Apparel employees: Kimbra Lo, Alyssa Ferguson, Marissa Wilson and Tesa Lubans-Dehaven. The same lawyer, Eric Baum, is representing all five girls in both suits.

Today we spoke to a source who knows Lo, as well as several of the other women. According the source, Lo worked for the company for seven months and left in May 2010. The source calls these group of women “estranged groupies” who are using this as a “way to get rich quick. They all know Dov, whether platonically, or not. Or in the case of Irene, she was practically stalking him.” When asked why these women might want to do such a thing, the source said. “It’s a way to get rich quick. Kimbra has a history of getting involved with high profile men, and this is her cash-out.”

Another source remarked, “All made threats of some sort not only to Charney but to other American Apparel employees like the photographers, etc. that if they didn’t get more money and attention, they would go public with a fake lawsuit. As of now, they have no evidence. This is a civil matter, not a criminal case, which is what people don’t understand. They won’t get a dime.”

It seems other folks are out to leak their own “smoking gun” photos and bits of gossip. We’ve been bombarded by anonymous tipsters leaking information about Kimbra Lo’s personal life and now extremely NSFW emails alleged to be from Irene Morales to to Dov Charney have appeared on two blogs–kimbralo.blogspot.com and alyssaferguson.blogspot.com. More photos of Lo with Olivier Zahm are featured on these blogs, as well as Lo’s alleged spread for hipster porn mag Jacques. Gawker received similar tips, including additional emails alleged to be from Morales to Charney, one of which is a list of American Apparel birthday items she wants, dangling this as bait: “do it for all those delicious blowjobs I would give you, and how I would lick your little asshole clean!!! And how I would love to do it again when I see you!”

According to the Daily News, Irene Morales’ suit says that Charney “forced her to go down on her knees just inside the front door and perform fellatio upon him,” and “[s]he was then, to all intents and purposes, held prisoner in the apartment for several hours and forced to perform additional sexual acts.” Kimbra Lo, the only claimant from the second suit to speak out as the other three girls signed confidentiality agreement during their employment, went on the Today show this morning and said Charney attacked her after she showed up at his house to discuss photography and modeling opportunities. “I didn’t feel like there was a way for me to leave safely..I was terrified,” she said.

Dov Charney is contesting the charges. His lawyer, Peter Schey, told the Times “The allegations are false. I think this is an effort to shake down American Apparel. These claims should be resolved in confidential arbitration.” In a statement given to the Today show, American Apparel said they have love letters from Lo to Charney after she left American Apparel and that they have “‘smoking gun’ photographs undermining her false accusations of unwelcome harassment.”


Fashionista in your inbox

Subscribe to our free email newsletter and get the best fashion, style, and beauty news and tips.

Most Popular Stories

Comments [52]

Dov Charney deserves all his bad karma!

What’s all the fuss about? From the picture you have posted, Irene Morales looks like a very wholesome young lady simply trying to help Dov out with a new idea for a publicity campaign. And all these years I thought an ATM was a bank outlet where you could get cash. From what you hip young people are posting, I find I am still right.

Rimjobs are skanky to the nth degree!!!

It’s right below ATMs.

What it an ATM? No don’t tell me. No, tell me.

human centipede-that is what you reminded me. i watch horror films, but i will never see that one

My college friend is now one of the top pornstars and she fills me in on the trends.

ATMs eventually lead to DPs, which is most lucrative.

BTW, I like the new add image function, will test it out soon.

Please do not test it during this thread. Oy.

Dov is a pervert, whether he’s guilty of these specific crimes or not.

Innocent until considered kindof creepy, amirite?

Whether or no you think he’s a pervert has nothing to do with the facts and evidence. These ladies are making false accusations or rape and so much more. And then demanding billions of dollars for themselves. Not so they can give it to charity, to the homeless in Haiti or Japan, or other sexual abuse victims. The money is for themselves.

Have you actually seen their blogs or read the New York Post article. You have to have half a brain to believe them.

I agree. All those emails? It’s freaking ridiculous. They’re using his reputation to get a ton of money out of him. A pervert does not a rapist make. Well, not always.

I changed my mind. I’m on no one’s side. This has sleazy written all over both parties. When hipsters go wrong.

Whomever did what, this whole thing is so ugly.

Regardless of who is “right” or “wrong”, or even “guilty”. The saddest part to me is how some still think that because a woman posed nude, or sent nude photos, or even talked about sex that she can’t be raped or sexually harassed. If these girls were 12 no one would accuse them of what some in the media is doing. Do I think this man Dov is guilty because he has a propensity to be a sleaze with his ads? No. But, I also don’t think these girls are automatically lying because of some emails and photos. I believe the truth is somewhere in the middle of this smear campaign and their claims against Dov.

I still think the media needs to do a lot more responsible reporting, and if there is any truth to some of them being underage when this happened, then it’s just sickening and sad. No one woman EVER deserves to be raped or sexually harassed DESPITE her career. When society wraps it’s head around that, then perhaps rape and sexual harassment will be taken far more seriously on a MORAL level than just on this off the cuff, well she’s a whore so she deserved it, or look she posed nude so she MUST be lying. I just can’t believe how this is being handled, and I kinda wish the media online and print would be the voice of reason in this topic. Because citing an alleged victims former jobs, and past is a tactic defense attorney’s use. And it’s sad, because again I don’t care what anyone says or thinks NO WOMAN SHOULD EVER BE RAPPED OR SEXUALLY HARASSED!

And these smear campaigns are just lame. This is the answer to the claim that MAYBE Dov, the CEO of a company that makes clothes that so many young women wear, might be some kind of sexual deviant? These allegations should be taken seriously and if these girls are lying it should be sorted out in court, NOT with smear campaigns.

Don’t count on that. You should look up the recent media coverage of the gang rape of an 11 year old girl. It’s all about how it’s going to ruin the mens’ lives and that she dressed like a hooker. Blame the rape victim is still a favorite game of many, even when it’s a child.

The fact the you are even mentioning these two cases in the same breath is appalling. Are you really comparing the gang-rape of an 11 year old CHILD to the “sexual harassment” of adult women legally capable of consent (and clearly legally capable of posing for porn…)

This is EXACTLY why these two woman are so disgusting… it’s lessening the seriousness and legitimacy of women and children who are ACTUALLY RAPED. It is women like this who encourage people to play “blame the victim” because they are so clearly NOT victims but in fact quite predatory themselves.

Also where and when do these girls… (pardon me WOMEN… lets stop calling them girls.. they are both ADULTS…) claim rape? NEVER. They never say “Dov raped me” … I just think thats interesting. Everyone is turning it into that, but they’ve never claimed he raped them exactly. And if he did, why did they not file a police report?

Why is she sick for mentioning the gang-rape of an 11 year old. What I think is sick is your assumptions. Just because “you” feel that this case doesn’t warrant any legitimacy is an opinion, and thank goodness you’re not the final say in this matter. You don’t have all the facts, but you’re sure sounding like you work for American Apparel.

And how sad that you think sexual harassment is somehow less destructive as rape. Girl, get your mind right and get off this horse you’re riding. Oh and go pick-up that check from Dov Charney. Dude is a pervert, so none of this is far-fetch. I mean who keeps emails from young girls? One of them was 17 when she began this exchange, and in some states that’s underage. Yeah, he’s such a upstanding dude that we just can write-off these claims as pure lies. NOT!

Why is she sick for mentioning the gang-rape of an 11 year old. What I think is sick is your assumptions. Just because “you” feel that this case doesn’t warrant any legitimacy is an opinion, and thank goodness you’re not the final say in this matter. You don’t have all the facts, but you’re sure sounding like you work for American Apparel.

And how sad that you think sexual harassment is somehow less destructive as rape. Girl, get your mind right and get off this horse you’re riding. Oh and go pick-up that check from Dov Charney. Dude is a pervert, so none of this is far-fetch. I mean who keeps emails from young girls? One of them was 17 when she began this exchange, and in some states that’s underage. Yeah, he’s such a upstanding dude that we just can write-off these claims as pure lies. NOT!

In the New York Post, it states that Irene Morales was 20 the last time she worked for American Apparel and she was 20 when she those e-mails. And she was not even employed by the company when she sent those e-mails. She started working when she was 17. She quit three times. Went back three times. Wrote to him and asked for money, clothes , and a computer. And she says she was afraid to lose her job so she was compelled to send over 40 erotic shots of herself? To phone sex him? Really?

We send 18 year olds to die in war. We send 18 yr olds to life in prison for heinous crimes.
You can ruin your credit at 18. Vote for president. Perform in porn. Think about it.

The biggest flaw in your little analogy Mr. Casanova is that those 18 year old’s consented to screw-up their credit, enroll in the military, and do porn, even if it’s wrong, it’s their choice. In some states a 17 year old is not legally able to consent. As you stated she started working for them at 17.

Sexual harrassment and rape aren’t consensual. And I include rape because sexual harrassment CAN lead to rape, and to me they’re in the same vein.

On the Today Show, Irene Morales said that she was raped in 2008.
But she sends him all of those raunchy e-mails and asks for money and clothes from 2008–2010. Then she goes to visit him in LA from NY in 2010.

How does this woman’s behavior even begin to make sense. And she wasn’t even working for Don when she sent most of those e-mails so she wasn’t at risk of losing a job.On the Today Show, Irene Morales said that she was raped in 2008.
But she sends him all of those raunchy e-mails and asks for money and clothes from 2008–2010. Then she goes to visit him in LA from NY in 2010.

How does this woman’s behavior even begin to make sense. And she wasn’t even working for Don when she sent most of those e-mails so she wasn’t at risk of losing a job.

SO what exactly happened to Kimbra Lo?

She wasn’t working for AA at the time… so it wasn’t sexual harassment.
She never claims he raped her… so it wasn’t rape.

Wait so a creepy older guy took creepy naked pictures of her and she felt disgusting afterwards and used when she didn’t get shot as a model for AA.

Boo hoo… I bet you can find TONS of girls with self respect and dignity who had similar advances made and DIDN’T GET NAKED!!! Making a bad choice as an adult, no matter how skewed the power relationship may be, no matter how old the guy is, no matter how rich he is and how poor your are is YOUR FAULT.

I hope her parents are proud.

And I’m gonna give you some rope and assume you are either on Eric Baums payroll or you got a little slutty for Dov and feel nasty now…

Boo hoo

do you know what REALLY sad? that women who are actually raped get discredited by gold diggers like this. this really, really disgusts me. some women are forcefully raped and get grouped with dumb girls like this who feel bad because they got used. being used by a man is not rape. grow up and get over it.

also i don’t think either of these girl have used the word “raped”… just “sexually harassed” or that they felt pressured or something… they aren’t even using the word rape because they weren’t… and if they were raped, if they REALLY cared about putting an end to this, why did they not press charges? it only turns into rape or sexual harassment when Dov stops paying up…

i don’t think these allegations should be taken seriously at all. if they were pressing charges with police take them seriously. when they are just looking for a pay day… smear away! these smear campaigns are just as lame as the allegations…. also they ARE relevant to the allegations made, esp. in the Kimbra Lo case where all the pictures of her naked with a big ol’ grin on her face, touching herself are from the that fateful meeting with Dov where she was “forced” to take these pictures… they do NOT look like someone being forced into anything. haha.

i will puke if any of these girls get a dime.

i think dov is disgusting and i think he probably treated these girls terribly but let’s be honest, they let him treat them terribly (i’ll be your slave says irene… wtf? have you no self respect?) and they are hurting the image of women everywhere.

i hope he sues their asses for libel.

You must be on Dov’s payroll. How can you say that these women are what makes it hard for “real” victims, then in the same breath agree that smear campaigns are OK? You’re being a hypocrite, or you work for American Apparel. I’m going to give you some rope, and say the later.

Not everyone who disagrees with you (and I daresay most people, given all the information, would disagree with you on this issue) is an employee of American Apparel. That’s a total cop out.

i have nothing to do with american apparel. i completely think dov is a creep and an asshole. i think he manipulated these girls. but do i think he committed a crime? NO. do i think these girl are gold diggers giving females a poor name? YES.

i have nothing to do with american apparel. i completely think dov is a creep and an asshole. i think he manipulated these girls. but do i think he committed a crime? NO. do i think these girl are gold diggers giving females a poor name? YES.

AGREED SEVEN and let me say it again, I whole heartedly agree with you. In addition to your comments, a person can have a sexual relationship with someone, send them dirty texts, emails, etc, but that doesn’t mean every future encounter is consensual. In fact, as most of us know, many rapes are committed by someone the victim knows. It just makes it a lot harder for the accused to be convicted because now they can release these emails and texts to prove the accuser’s “a hoe”.

Most of the dirty texts and emails were sent AFTER the allegedly “non-consensual” sexual encounter in the case of Irene Morales.

“a hoe”… maybe i mean her fav song is “hos in every area code”

Anyone else notice that Kimbra Lo and Irene Morales are dressed head to toe in American Apparel clothes for their Today Show Interview.

That’s weird.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/worker_sat_for_shutterbug_dov_E49qGFUMpK4yWS8hDqZWHO

The latest NY Post article provides more insight on the Kimbra Lo case. But of course Fashionista actually broke the news first!

If she were a boxer, her nickname would be Irene “Loose Morals” Morales…

Maybe Dov is sobering up. Hiring someone who is tough and good to correct its woes and here in Los Angeles, his stores are looking fabulous again for college or just out of’s. The displays are sort of hipster/vintage/cool/minimal and the childrens collection is classic and cute.

Sad to have a certain reputation and be subject to bad situations that I sincerely hope are not true.

They hired someone new (CEO, president? one of those big titles) a few months ago who came from Blockbuster (I know, right?) so apparently they’re doing a great job. I’d noticed a bit of a change too.

On the Today Show, Irene Morales said that she was raped in 2008.
But she sends him all of those raunchy e-mails and asks for money and clothes from 2008–2010. Then she goes to visit him in LA from NY in 2010.

How does this woman’s behavior even begin to make sense. And she wasn’t even working for Don when she sent most of those e-mails so she wasn’t at risk of losing a job.

If I was on the board of directors for American Apparel, I would demand Charney’s resignation. The CEO and board insurance alone must be huge expenses to AA now, and Charney’s reputation is most likely deleterious to the health of company sales.

Irrespective of how these cases turn out, running a business like a pubescent wet dream has only stunted American Apparel’s longevity and growth, especially in an economy where consumers are more selective with their dollar and parental largess has tightened up considerably.

The board has stood by him.

If you had read the Gawker and New York Post article, you’ll realize that Irene is also suing all of the board of directors along with Dov for sexual harassment. Read it on the official court papers.

Yes, in this economy. American Apparel hires over 10,000 people just in the LA area alone. And who know how many more across the US and the world. Not to the mention the businesses that are financially interconnected to American Apparel. The company isn’t even worth 300 million. Dumb and dumber are asking for 250 million each.

Do you your research before blurting out ignorant comments.

Yes, in this economy. American Apparel hires over 10,000 people just in the LA area alone. And who know how many more across the US and the world. Not to the mention the businesses that are financially interconnected to American Apparel. The company isn’t even worth 300 million. Dumb and dumber are asking for 250 million each.

Do you your research before blurting out ignorant comments.

I wasn’t arguing from the position of any of the board members, hence my use of conditional first person (e.g. “If I” and “I”). And boards are always sued as part of corporate law suits — which is why incorporated organizations have board and executive insurance to protect company assets from management malfeasance. Also Charney now owns 54% of AA stock, so the likelihood of executive removal is nil as he is majority owner.

Perhaps you should obtain some critical reading skills.

Fooch, they name the Board as being active participants on the harassment. Street Carnage and Gawker have published the PUBLIC court documents. Learn how to read.

@Foochy. REad the court papers. The plaintiffs are ALSO SUING THE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS for being IN on the sexual harassment.

@Foochy. REad the court papers. The plaintiffs are ALSO SUING THE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS for being IN on the sexual harassment.

Not shocking at all

Not shocking at all

remember that this is a civil suit – accusations, not “charges.”