If I was on the jury, I'd definitely vote copyright infringement. The original is not just a leopard print, it is a stylized, oversize leopard print--as is the Target version.
Also, the original has a two-tone background, as does the Target version. The pattern similarity is even more striking on a sleeveless version of the DVF dress with the same neckline, as shown here: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2099/2219936973_19e09d70fa_o.jpg
Cavalli has a leopardskin print, but the pattern is nothing like the stylized, oversize DVF version, which is quite distinctive.
That rumor we spread about Mark Fast doing a line for Topshop? It's true. And it's in last week's Sunday Telegraph magazine which means it was true before we even said anything and we've had it in our lap since... Read More
Meet Blue Logan, if you haven't already. A couple of years ago a friend dragged the soft-spoken Brit to a show at London Fashion Week, Aquascutum he thinks, and he started to draw the models as they walked down the... Read More
Entry: Adventures in Copyright: Target Does DVF
posted by LisaJay
Jan 26, 2008 8:09AM
If I was on the jury, I'd definitely vote copyright infringement. The original is not just a leopard print, it is a stylized, oversize leopard print--as is the Target version.
Also, the original has a two-tone background, as does the Target version. The pattern similarity is even more striking on a sleeveless version of the DVF dress with the same neckline, as shown here: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2099/2219936973_19e09d70fa_o.jpg
Cavalli has a leopardskin print, but the pattern is nothing like the stylized, oversize DVF version, which is quite distinctive.