Skip to main content

How Anne Fulenwider Went from an English Lit Major to 'Marie Claire' Editor-in-Chief

And how different her management style is from past bosses, Graydon Carter and Joanna Coles.
Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Zendaya, 'Marie Claire' Editor-in-Chief Anne Fulenwider, Hailey Baldwin and Kylie Jenner at the 'Fresh Faces' party celebrating the magazine's May issue in Los Angeles. Photo: Matt Winkelmeyer/Pret-a-Reporter/Getty Images

Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Zendaya, 'Marie Claire' Editor-in-Chief Anne Fulenwider, Hailey Baldwin and Kylie Jenner at the 'Fresh Faces' party celebrating the magazine's May issue in Los Angeles. Photo: Matt Winkelmeyer/Pret-a-Reporter/Getty Images

In our long-running series, "How I'm Making It," we talk to people making a living in the fashion industry about how they broke in and found success.

Ever since she was the editor of her high school newspaper, Marie Claire Editor-in-Chief Anne Fulenwider knew her calling. "This is really the only thing I know how to do," she told Fashionista as we sat in her sunlit office on the 34th floor of the Hearst Tower, which is decorated so beautifully that it would not look out of place in the pages of fellow Hearst publication Elle Décor

While she naturally has an instinct for finding that really good story, Fulenwider studied English Literature — not journalism — at Harvard University. "I tried out for the newspaper," she said. "It was really not my scene, so I ended up at the literary magazine there. But I have always loved storytelling and interpreting culture through words and pictures, so I think English Literature was also the only thing I wanted to do." After graduating, she started with an internship at David Lauren's startup Swing magazine, geared towards the 20-somethings of that time, which fast-tracked her journalism career.

Next, at the The Paris Review, Fulenwider served as both senior editor and research assistant to the famed George Plimpton when he wrote his 1998 book about Truman Capote. Then she spent 10 years at Vanity Fair as senior articles editor. "Every job was more interesting than the next," she said. Today, Fulenwider is at Marie Claire for the second time: She initially worked under now-Cosmopolitan Editor-in-Chief Joanna Coles for two years as executive editor, and then left for Brides to serve as editor-in-chief. Fulenwider returned to Marie Claire less than a year later step into the top role, and that's where she's been ever since. 

"I've always been interested in not just storytelling, but in learning about women's stories, so it seems completely inevitable that I would end up here," Fulenwider said about running the fashion, beauty and all-around female empowerment-focused magazine. She definitely has some interesting experiences to share, including what it was like to send the Selena Gomez-covered June issue to print. Read on for highlights from our conversation.

'Marie Claire' Editor-in-Chief Anne Fulenwider. Photo: courtesy

'Marie Claire' Editor-in-Chief Anne Fulenwider. Photo: courtesy

You've worked under two pretty well-known editors: Vanity Fair's Graydon Carter and Cosmopolitan's Joanna Coles. What did you learn from working for such exact and, I'm assuming, demanding bosses?

Actually, neither of them was really that demanding. [laughs] They were really great at what they did. Before that, I worked for George Plimpton, who was also a big New York character. One of the things I learned from each of them is the importance of remaining curious about the world. I've said that before, but I really can't stress it enough — and I love that about New York. I've been in New York for 20 years. It's just the idea that there's another adventure around [the corner]; remain open to them and to any kind of story. George Plimpton was a great storyteller and a great collector of people. Graydon was hilarious and funny and demanded excellence in a way that didn't feel overburdened. I learned so much about getting the best out of people and not stopping until you have a really excellent story or photograph or layout. And Joanna was so different in her leadership style in that she was very approachable and very inclusive. As executive editor [at Marie Claire], I got to see, really, everything.

How would you say your management style is?

If Graydon is over here [gestures to her far right] as authoritarian — or that's not the right word — very top-down, and Joanna was over here [gestures to her left] in terms of democratic and accessible, I'm about in the middle. 

In between your executive editor role and your now editor-in-chief position at Marie Claire, you were EIC of Brides. What was it like going from fashion and lifestyle to very focused on bridal?

Having been the number-two editor at Marie Claire, I saw very closely what it was like to be number one, and I was really interested in that. I had sort of grown up at Condé Nast, so when they called me, I was thrilled. My feeling about it: This is a topic that I understand and it would be a great way to learn how to be an editor-in-chief. So I felt very good about the fact that it was such a narrow focus and that I felt comfortable in it. I certainly didn't know the industry at all, and I spent the nine months that I was there learning that and getting to know the people and the players. But in terms of how to make a good magazine, it was a great first testing ground.

Partially because of the focus?

Basically, you're doing the same topic every single month, so it's really great grounds to innovate, design, work with photographers and learn how to change it up. How to change that topic and make it interesting every month was something that was a really, really good experience for me. I learned so much. I also was there to combine the digital and print teams. They had never operated together. When I got there, was under a completely different editor-in-chief. They had lived in a different building; they'd never met each other. They didn't coordinate content, so one of the reasons I wanted to go there was because it was such a digital [experience]. 

How did you find the difference in working at Condé Nast versus Hearst, especially in the digital age?

Scroll to Continue

Recommended Articles

Working at Vanity Fair for 10 years, I didn't really learn about the Condé Nast culture because Vanity Fair was its own planet and universe, as some of the other brands there are, too. And this was years ago. I was a senior editor, but I didn't interact with corporate, so by the time I got back there at Brides, it was a really interesting time for Condé Nast. They were undergoing a huge merging of digital and print. While I was there, the digital leadership at Condé underwent some changes. It was certainly a time when lots of companies were struggling with how that would work. Hearst was doing it as well. I love it [at Hearst]. It feels very open and transparent. There are plenty of people to collaborate with and to ask questions to; you can feel you can bring any idea to leadership and they're really into it and they want more from you. 

Condé Nast has historically been the more glamorous company and really more about intimidation. [laughs] And Hearst, [with] Harper's Bazaar, Elle and Marie Claire now, they really focused on their fashion brands — and even the changes to Town & Country lately — the different fashion voices here are very diverse and it feels like a company that loves to innovate. It's been a great place to be an editor-in-chief. It's really fun. It's been an adventure. I feel very supported.

Is it fun to be an editor-in-chief?

It is really, really fun to be the editor-in-chief of Marie Claire. As my husband will tell you, I love bossing people around. Brides was a hugely important step in my career and so I learned so much. I'm really glad I did it first... then I got to Marie Claire and the idea of being an editor-in-chief wasn't so new to me. Being the editor of Marie Claire is the best job in the world. There's something about it that's really zeitgeist-y now, although [Marie Claire] always had this women's empowerment and cause-related spine to it. But I feel like the "change the world" attitude is universal, so there's something really fun about being at a brand that's so on-message for its time.

Selena Gomez covers the June issue of 'Marie Claire.' Photo: courtesy

Selena Gomez covers the June issue of 'Marie Claire.' Photo: courtesy

What was it like for you to put the Selena Gomez June issue together and push it out the door?

I feel like on any given day, I'm working on about seven issues at once. The long lead, then there's press for the past one. And it's always a bit chaotic, but in a really fun way. I'm a big fan of bringing everyone in the room and just saying, 'OK, how are we going to do this? What's the concept for Selena Gomez, or what photographer can we get?' We're thrilled to work with Kai Z. Feng [for the June cover]. But it's a group effort. It's not like you ever sit down and say, 'the entire June issue will be this, this and this.' It's a synthesis of departments. 

What is it like for you in terms of securing the cover star? How was it getting Selena? 

We have a phenomenal entertainment director, Tracy Schaffer. She lives in L.A., so she speaks Hollywood-ese, the language, and she has amazing relationships. Selena Gomez's publicist, Brit [Reece] and Tracy used to work together at PMK, so it was very friendly conversation. Doing covers is a full-time job. We had some issues today with the timing of our September cover shoot, and we thought we had someone for November that we just found out we don't have because the movie's shifted. So, I guess the job is really managing chaos.

A big wish list [item] of mine was to improve our presence in L.A., so hiring Tracy was a strategic move on my part and she's been fantastic at getting people that we've never had before for a cover. We did something called the Image Makers for the first time this year in January — that was a big fun event at the Chateau Marmont. And we were just there for our Fresh Faces party for the May issue, with five different cover girls. Some of the conversations about [covers] takes place at those parties. We've been co-sponsoring a party with the Weinsteins after the Golden Globes. We've done a couple of cover deals on the fly at a party over a glass of tequila.

And then there are all these things I do that are not related to the magazine. I love working on the issue and getting it out and talking to our website director about stories we can do in tandem. But almost every day I have some sort of meeting or lunch or pleasant interaction that has nothing to do with the content of the magazine, but has everything to do with extended family of the magazine. 

What are the most interesting not-related-to-an-issue meeting or conversations that you've had lately?

Just meeting [education activist] Malala [Yousafzai] at a luncheon was a great experience. I went to Washington and spent the day with some female senators and congresswomen. It was really interesting walking on the Senate floor and working with the White House has been great. [I met] Alyssa Mastromonaco, who used to work for Obama as deputy chief of staff. We did a profile on her. She loved her experience with us, she became a friend of the magazine and now she's a contributing editor. 

Getting to know Janet Mock has been really interesting. I've just become an advisory board member on Girl Up, which is a United Nations Foundation [organization] about girls' empowerment around the world. It's just been a really horizon opening and perspective broadening job to go see what's going on in the world in all sorts of categories. I like that what we cover is so diverse. I love fashion — a whole interesting part of my career is getting to know the fashion world and I love going to Paris twice a year and Milan. It's a big treat. It's also a lot of work, but it's really fun. And then there's this women's empowerment world, which is getting bigger and bigger and bigger. Thank god. 

This interview has been edited and condensed.

Want more Fashionista? Sign up for our daily newsletter and get us directly in your inbox.